图书馆订阅: Guest
国际能源材料和化学驱动期刊

每年出版 6 

ISSN 打印: 2150-766X

ISSN 在线: 2150-7678

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 0.7 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 0.7 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.1 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00016 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.18 SJR: 0.313 SNIP: 0.6 CiteScore™:: 1.6 H-Index: 16

Indexed in

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE THERMAL BEHAVIOR OF A PROPELLANT INCREMENT DURING TRANSPORT AND STORAGE

卷 20, 册 3, 2021, pp. 1-16
DOI: 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2021036929
Get accessGet access

摘要

This study characterizes the thermal behavior of a propellant increment of a mortar exposed to a variety of thermal environments and packaging configurations that are common during the storage, transport, and inspection of munitions. A mortar is a projectile that is fired by dropping it into a tube and striking a percussion primer on a firing pin at the bottom of the tube. A propellant increment is the portion of a propelling charge that can be removed from the mortar assembly to adjust the velocity of the mortar as it exits the mortar tube after being fired. The performance of the propellant is driven by the resulting pressure profile within the weapon system once it is ignited, which is driven by the burn rate. The burn rate is based on the chemical properties of the propellant as well as the temperature distribution and average bulk temperature of the propellant within the increment. The performance of the propellant is observed through the distance the mortar travels after being fired and the flight stability of the munition, which in extreme cases can cause erratic flight. This study is divided into two parts, with an overall goal of developing a predictive capability to estimate the temperature response of a propellant increment over several scenarios. First, a prototype numerical model is developed using known material properties that match an expected response. Second, experimental data is collected in a format and frequency that supports validation of the numerical model. The experimental data collection focuses on monitoring temperature response at discrete points within the volume of an increment over several heating and cooling scenarios in a controlled laboratory oven. The laboratory oven enables the control of external factors, and the numerical model accounts for variations of thermal solar loading, packaging configuration, and orientation.
Ideally, a method would allow for the estimation of the bulk temperature of an increment, but results indicate that while there are regions of the volume of propellant that approximate the bulk temperature within 10%, these regions are not constant across scenarios, and without a priori knowledge, the location of these regions in each scenario cannot be estimated accurately. Additionally, perforating the shell of the increment creates a safety hazard and potential performance degradation, and the surface of the increment does not provide a reliable estimate of the bulk temperature of the propellant in most scenarios studied. More in-depth analysis, most likely with a priori knowledge of the historical temperature distribution within the propellant itself, is needed to provide a more reliable estimate of the temperature distribution and bulk temperature of the increment.

参考文献
  1. ANSYS Fluent, Commercial Release 2019 R3, ANSYS Inc., 2019.

  2. Atwood, A.I., Boggs, T.L., Curran, P.O., Parr, T.P., Hanson-Parr, D.M., Price, C.F., and Wiknich, J., Burning Rate of Solid Propellant Ingredients, Part 1: Pressure and Initial Temperature Effects, J. Propul. Power, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 740-747,1999.

  3. Beckstead, M.W., Puduppakkam, K., Thakre, P., and Yang, V., Modeling of Combustion and Ignition of Solid-Propellant Ingredients, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 33, pp. 497-551, 2007.

  4. Bidwell, S., Brassey's Artillery of the World, S. Bidwell, Ed., London: Brassey's Publishers Ltd., 1977.

  5. Blecker, K. and Hadim, H., Characterization of the Thermal Response of Munitions in Storage Exposed to Real and Arbitrary Weather Conditions, Propel. Explos. Pyrotech., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 238-244,2016.

  6. Blecker, K. and Hadim, H., A Numerical Model to Analyze the Thermal Behavior of a Propellant Increment, Volume 8A: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering, Proc. of ASME 2015 Int. Mechan. Eng. Congress and Exposition, Houston, TX, vol. 57496, p. V08AT10A022, 2016b. DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2015-50356.

  7. Cameron, W.D., The G. F. P. in the Next War, J. U.S. Artillery, vol. 54,no. 1,pp. 170-173,1921.

  8. de Villiers, D., Improved Mortar Setup Technique, Land Warfare Conf., Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2008.

  9. Deevi, S., Kishore, K., and Pai Verneker, V.R., Role of Aluminum-Magnesium Alloys in Humid Aging of Composite Solid Propellants, J. Propul. Power, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 411-420,1989.

  10. Department of the Army, Mortars, Department of the Army, Washington, DC, Technical Order 11W2-5-13-21, Rep. No. FM 23-90,2002.

  11. Greatrix, D.R., Influence of Initial Propellant Temperature on Solid Rocket Internal Ballistics, J. Propul. Power, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 869-875,2014.

  12. Hasegawa, H., Fukunaga, M., Kitagawa, K., and Shimada, T., Burning Rate Anomaly of Composite Propellant Grains, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves, vol. 49, pp. 583-592,2013.

  13. Hunter, B., Pacella, H., and Blecker, K., Numerical Characterization and Validation of the Thermal Response of an Empty ISO Container Exposed to Real Weather Conditions, Heat Transf. Res., vol. 49, no. 13, pp. 1275-1297,2018.

  14. Kumar, M. and Kuo, K.K., Effect of Deformation on Flame Spreading and Combustion in Propellant Cracks, AIAAJ., vol. 19,no. 12,pp. 1580-1589,1981.

  15. Kundu, P.K. and Cohen, I.M., Fluid Mechanics, 4th ed., P.S. Ayyaswamy and H.H. Hu, Eds., New York: Elsevier, 2008.

  16. Marshakov, V.N., Puchkov, V.M., and Finyakov, S.V., Temperature Sensitivity of the Burning Velocity of Nitroglycerin-BasedPropellants, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B., vol. 4, pp. 950-953,2010.

  17. Minitab Commercial Release 16.2.4, Minitab Inc., 2013.

  18. Oefelein, J.C. and Yang, V., Comprehensive Review of Liquid-Propellant Combustion Instabilities in F-1 Engines, J. Propul. Power, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 657-677,1993.

  19. Ravi, P., Badgujar, D.M., Gore, G.M., Tewari, S.P., and Silder, A.K., Review on Melt Cast Explosives, Propel. Explos. Pyrotech, vol. 36, pp. 393-403,2011.

  20. Stine, G.Y., An Investigation into Propellant Stability, Anal. Chem., vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 475A-478A, 1991.

  21. Waesche, R.H.W. and Wenograd, J., Calculation of Solid-Propellant Burning Rates from Condensed-Phase Decomposition Kinetics, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves, vol. 36, no. 1,pp. 125-134,2000.

Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集 订购及政策 Begell House 联系我们 Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain