图书馆订阅: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集
器官移植长期效应期刊
SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN 打印: 1050-6934
ISSN 在线: 1940-4379

器官移植长期效应期刊

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v19.i4.40
pages 271-278

Design Optimization of Skeletal Hip Implant Cross- Sections Using Finite-Element Analysis

Pearline Beulah
Biomedical Engineering Division, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) University, Vellore, India
Sudesh Sivarasu
University of Cape Town
Lazar Mathew
Centre for Biomedical Research, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) University, Vellore, India

ABSTRACT

The major causes for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty are aseptic loosening, dislocation, wear, design factors, stress shielding on the bone, and mechanical and biological factors. A material with toughness and high wear properties is essential for a good hip implant because these implants fail due to design. Stress shielding is found to be the major cause for the failure of hip implants, and can lead to the implant needing to be replaced or revised, which is painful for the patient and costly for the health care industry. The hip stem designs developed by various manufacturers are solid stems with indentations; stems with collars; collarless, tapered stems; and teardrop-shaped, polished stems without indentations. They are found to have a greater rigidity, and therefore they transfer less load proximally, which results in high proximal stress shielding of the proximal femur. A stem of low stiffness alone would not suffice in achieving a reduced or optimal stress shielding. The existing design proposals to minimize the effect of stress shielding are focused on the use of lightweight materials, composite materials, circular and longitudinal hole patterns, and different hollow-bore depths. A skeletal hip implant with varying cross-sections was designed and finite-element analysis was performed. The skeletal hip implant with a hexagonal cross-section was optimized based on the mass of the implant and the load-bearing capacity. This lightweight, novel design ameliorates implant fixation, minimizes stress shielding, enhances the longevity of the implant, and offers better mobility to the patient.


Articles with similar content:

Fixed Versos Mobile Bearing Knee Arthroplasty: A Review of Kinematics and Results
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.21, 2011, issue 3
A. P. Apostolopoulos, E. Chronopoulos, G. Papachristou, loannis V. Michos, Stergios N. Lallos, Nikolaos E. Efstathopoulos, Andreas F. Mavrogenis
Use of Ferrule Rings as Stress Dissipators in Temporomandibular Joint Intramedullary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis Study
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.28, 2018, issue 4
Martin Pendola, Thorsten Kirsch, Jake Cresta, Alesha Castillo
Composite Resin in Medicine and Dentistry
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.15, 2005, issue 6
Jennifer Sullivan, Paul B. Osborne, Pamela S. Stein, James E. Haubenreich
Osseointegration of Cobalt-Chrome Alloy Implants
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.21, 2011, issue 4
George C. Babis, Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos, Andreas F. Mavrogenis
Stress Analysis of an Artificial Temporal Mandibular Joint
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.28, 2000, issue 3&4
Amit Roychowdhury, S. Pal