图书馆订阅: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集
生物医学工程评论综述™
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN 打印: 0278-940X
ISSN 在线: 1943-619X

生物医学工程评论综述™

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2019026534
pages 153-158

Proof of Concept for a Universal Identification System for Medical Devices

Courtney Mason
School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Benjamin Erlick
Mayo Clinic Arizona, School of Medicine Scottsdale, Arizona
Jeffrey T. La Belle
School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

ABSTRACT

Medical devices need a unified way of accessing information that uniquely identifies them. This can provide traceability to specifications, lot numbers, recalls, and the like. Such a system would have applications for devices both in and out of the body. Common barcodes, such as a UPC code, can only be read in plain sight, when nothing comes between the scanner and the code. UPC coding is not suitable for all medical devices because some are implanted in the body or are otherwise inaccessible without invasive techniques. This article demonstrates a proof of concept for XRF coding on devices. Material codes were made and read externally by an XRF reader. The reading showed trace amounts of the chemicals that compose the medical device in the background signal. The energy levels of the chemicals were assigned values to build a readable code correlated with information about the medical device it is attached to. Attachment can be made during material synthesis, part or product manufacture, or even after final assembly. The technique demonstrated here is a promising concept for the future of medical device detection.

REFERENCES

  1. Nicewarner-Pena SR. , Submicrometer metallic barcodes. Science. 2001 Oct 5;294(5540):137–41.

  2. Eastman PS, Ruan W, Doctolero M, Nuttall R, de Feo G, Park JS, Cooke P, Gray JW, Li S, Chen FF. , Qdot nanobarcodes for multiplexed gene expression analysis. Nano Lett. 2006 May;6(5):1059–64.

  3. Sattayasamitsathit S, Burdick J, Bash R, Kanatharana P, Thavarungkul P, Wang J. , Alloy nanowires bar codes based on nondestructive X-ray fluorescence readout. Anal Chem. 2007 Oct;79(19):7571–5.

  4. Rouillon M, Kristensen LJ, Gore DB. , Handheld X-ray fluorescence spectrometers: radiation exposure risks of matrix-specific measurement scenarios. Appl Spectrosc. 2015 Jul 1;69(7):815–22.

  5. Radiology (ACR) RS of NA (RSNA) and AC of. Patient safety–radiation dose in X-ray and CT exams [Internet]. [cited 2018 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.radiologyinfo. org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray.

  6. Van Grieken R, Markowitz A. , Handbook of X‐ray spectrometry: methods and techniques. Milton Park (United Kingdom): Taylor & Francis; 2001. 1016 p.

  7. Dik J, Janssens K, Van Der Snickt G, van der Loeff L, Rickers K, Cotte M., Visualization of a lost painting by Vincent van Gogh using synchrotron radiation based X-ray fluorescence elemental mapping. Anal Chem. 2008 Aug;80(16):6436–42.

  8. Grabianowski E. , How VINs work [Internet]. How stuff works. 2006 [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: https:// auto.howstuffworks.com/buying-selling/vin.htm.

  9. Metals–melting temperatures [Internet]. [cited 2018 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.engineeringtoolbox. com/melting-temperature-metals-d_860.html.

  10. Goldstein J, Newbury DE, Joy DC, Lyman CE, Echlin P, Lifshin E, Sawyer L, Michael JR. , Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2003.