图书馆订阅: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集
雾化与喷雾
影响因子: 1.262 5年影响因子: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN 打印: 1044-5110
ISSN 在线: 1936-2684

卷:
卷 29, 2019 卷 28, 2018 卷 27, 2017 卷 26, 2016 卷 25, 2015 卷 24, 2014 卷 23, 2013 卷 22, 2012 卷 21, 2011 卷 20, 2010 卷 19, 2009 卷 18, 2008 卷 17, 2007 卷 16, 2006 卷 15, 2005 卷 14, 2004 卷 13, 2003 卷 12, 2002 卷 11, 2001 卷 10, 2000 卷 9, 1999 卷 8, 1998 卷 7, 1997 卷 6, 1996 卷 5, 1995 卷 4, 1994 卷 3, 1993 卷 2, 1992 卷 1, 1991

雾化与喷雾

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2016015409
pages 61-79

ASSESSMENT OF DROPLET BREAKUP MODELS IN HIGH-SPEED CROSS-FLOW

Anand Bhandarkar
Defence Research and Development Laboratory, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad-500058, India
P. Manna
Defence Research and Development Laboratory, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad-500058, India
Debasis Chakraborty
Defence Research and Development Laboratory, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad-500058, India

ABSTRACT

The breakup process in quiescent atmosphere and high-speed cross-flow is numerically simulated. Three-dimensional RANS equations with the K-ε turbulence model are solved using commercial CFD software. Different droplet breakup models, namely, TAB, ETAB, Ritz-Diwakar, and KH-RT models are studied to assess their predictive capability in characterizing spray in high-speed cross-flow. The validation test cases include liquid injection into quiescent atmosphere, and subsonic and supersonic cross-flow. Computed droplet velocity, droplet size, and spray penetration are compared with the experimental/numerical data available in the literature. For diesel injection in quiescent atmosphere, computed spray penetration matches reasonably well with the experimental data. For subsonic cross-flow, although the penetration height is underpredicted, SMD distribution and particle velocity match reasonably well with the experimental data. The ETAB model captures the SMD values at different locations and velocities better with experimental data in comparison to the TAB model. For the supersonic cross-flow case, penetration height and SMD have a good match with the experimental data. The Stokes drag model performs better than the high-Mach and dynamic drag models. Droplet drag law for supersonic flow needs to be revised to have better predictive capability of spray characteristics in high-speed flow.