Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.332 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN Druckformat: 1050-6934
ISSN Online: 1940-4379

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2016017569
pages 253-260

Electrostimulation for Refractory Epilepsy: A Review

Chandrika Shenoy
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Hani Aodah Alzahrani
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Adrian R. M. Upton
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N3Z5, Canada
Markad V. Kamath
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5 Canada

ABSTRAKT

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that has been diagnosed in approximately 1% of the world's population. In North America alone, more than 3 million individuals suffer from epilepsy. Antiepileptic drugs are not fully effective in some patients, and most drugs have adverse side effects. Recently, several stimulation techniques (responsive neural, vagal nerve, transcranial magnetic, and deep brain) have been used as adjunct therapies to treat medically refractive seizures. Since its Food and Drug Administration approval in 2013, responsive neural stimulation (RNS), a closed-loop electrical stimulation system, has emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative to treat patients with epilepsy (PWE). RNS consists of a cranially implantable neurostimulator that sends electrical pulses using depth electrodes to epileptic foci/focus after the device senses irregular electrical activity, thus avoiding the onset of a seizure. In a long-term study that lasted 7 yr and involved more than 245 patients using RNS, results showed that16% of patients were seizure free, 60% had 50% or greater seizure reduction, and 84% had some improvement. Quality of life improved in 44% of the patients by the end of the second year. There is a need for more, larger, well-designed, randomized, controlled trials to validate and optimize efficacy and safety of invasive intracranial neurostimulation treatments in PWE. This article highlights the effects of treating patients with medically refractive seizures using RNS.


Articles with similar content:

Deep Brain Stimulation as a Treatment for Refractory Epilepsy: Review of the Current State-of-the-Art
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.27, 2017, issue 1
Adrian R. M. Upton, Markad V. Kamath, Malika P. Ganguli
Rehabilitation for Patients With Brain Tumors
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.15, 2003, issue 2
Minh Tran
Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: Approach to Rehabilitation
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.25, 2013, issue 3-4
Christina May Moran de Brito, Rebeca Boltes Cecatto, Leonardo Sanches Municelli, Linamara Rizzo Battistella
Outcomes of Implant-Arthrodesis as Limb Salvage for Failed Total Knee Arthroplasties with Significant Bone Loss: Case Series
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.28, 2018, issue 4
Paula Stritch, Hosam E. Matar, Nicholas Emms
Chinese Herbal Medicine for Menopausal Symptoms
Forum on Immunopathological Diseases and Therapeutics, Vol.3, 2012, issue 1
Hong-Yong Deng, Lian-Wei Xu, Man Jia, Sven Schroeder, Roland Salchow, Xue-Jun Cui