Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.332 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN Druckformat: 1050-6934
ISSN Online: 1940-4379

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v18.i2.40
pages 151-165

Clinical, Surface Damage and Oxidative Performance of Poly II Tibial Inserts After Long-Term Implantation

Francisco Medel
Drexel University
Steven M. Kurtz
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA; Exponent Inc., Philadelphia, PA
Gregg R. Klein
Hartzband Center for Hip and Knee Replacement, L.L.C., 10 Forest Avenue, Paramus, NJ 07652, USA
Harlan Levine
Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ
Peter Sharkey
Rothman Institute, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA
Matthew Austin
Rothman Institute, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA
Matthew Kraay
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
Clare M. Rimnac
Musculoskeletal Mechanics and Materials Laboratories, Departments of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Orthopaedics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH


Carbon fiber−reinforced ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (Poly II) was clinically introduced in the 1970s, but catastrophic short-term outcomes were reported in case studies. Clinical use of Poly II persisted into the 1980s until it was eventually abandoned. To date, no studies have documented its long-term clinical and material performance. Forty Poly II tibial inserts of the Total Condylar, Insall-Burstein I, and Miller-Galante I designs were retrieved at revision surgery. Twenty-six historical unreinforced polyethylene knee retrievals of similar designs (Miller-Galante I and II, and Insall-Burstein II) served as the control group. The average in vivo durations of both retrieval groups were similar (11.1 and 11.6 years, respectively), although Poly II had a wider implantation range (3.7−32.8 years) than historical polyethylene (4.4−17.0 years). Surface damage on all the retrievals, as well as oxidation and mechanical strength when possible, were characterized. Poly II tibial inserts had long-term clinical survivability and material performance comparable to unreinforced polyethylene bearings. Poly II retrievals exhibited less surface damage at all the regions than historical components, and they were less sensitive to pitting and delamination, but more susceptible to abrasion and embedded debris. Both Poly II and historical retrievals were found to oxidize in vivo and exhibited similar mechanical strength. This study provides improved understanding of well-consolidated Poly II long-term retrievals and also motivation to revisit carbon fiber−reinforced polymeric bearings for joint replacement in the twenty-first century.

Articles with similar content:

Fixed Versos Mobile Bearing Knee Arthroplasty: A Review of Kinematics and Results
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.21, 2011, issue 3
A. P. Apostolopoulos, E. Chronopoulos, G. Papachristou, loannis V. Michos, Stergios N. Lallos, Nikolaos E. Efstathopoulos, Andreas F. Mavrogenis

Retrieval Analysis of a Polycarbonate-Urethane Acetabular Cup: A Case Report
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.18, 2008, issue 1
Steven M. Kurtz

Effect of Modularity on the Fatigue Performance of Tibial Tray Designs in TKA Prostheses
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.26, 2016, issue 1
Rupesh Ghyar, Ahilan Anantha Krishnan, Bhallamudi Ravi

Frictional Torque and Wear of Retrieved Hip Prostheses: A Comparison Between Alumina/PE and Co-Cr/PE Prostheses
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.12, 2002, issue 1
Yoshio Shirasaki, Isao Hirose, Atsushi Kusaba, Yoshikatsu Kuroki, Jorg Scholz, Saiji Kondo, Tetsuta Tateishi, Yuichi Ito

A Study on Polyethylene Stresses in Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) using Explicit Finite Element Analysis
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.23, 2013, issue 4
Anindya Deb, Malhar N. Kumar, Gunti Ranga Srinivas