Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Journal of Porous Media
Impact-faktor: 1.49 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 1.159 SJR: 0.504 SNIP: 0.671 CiteScore™: 1.58

ISSN Druckformat: 1091-028X
ISSN Online: 1934-0508

Volumes:
Volumen 22, 2019 Volumen 21, 2018 Volumen 20, 2017 Volumen 19, 2016 Volumen 18, 2015 Volumen 17, 2014 Volumen 16, 2013 Volumen 15, 2012 Volumen 14, 2011 Volumen 13, 2010 Volumen 12, 2009 Volumen 11, 2008 Volumen 10, 2007 Volumen 9, 2006 Volumen 8, 2005 Volumen 7, 2004 Volumen 6, 2003 Volumen 5, 2002 Volumen 4, 2001 Volumen 3, 2000 Volumen 2, 1999 Volumen 1, 1998

Journal of Porous Media

DOI: 10.1615/JPorMedia.2019029049
pages 363-385

EVALUATING MODEL REDUCTION METHODS FOR HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN POROUS MATERIALS: PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION AND PROPER GENERALIZED DECOMPOSITION

Julien Berger
Thermal Systems Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Graduate Program, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Rua Imaculada ConceiÃgÃco, 1155, CEP: 80215-901, Curitiba - Paraná, Brazil
S. Guernouti
Cerema, Dter Ouest, Nantes, France
M. Woloszyn
Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LOCIE, F-73000 Chambéry, France

ABSTRAKT

This paper explores deeper the features of model reduction methods proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and proper generalized decomposition (PGD) applied to heat and moisture transfer in porous materials. The first method is an a posteriori one and therefore requires a previous computation of the solution using the large original model to build the reduced basis. The second one is a priori and does not need any previous computation. The reduced order model is built straightforward. Both methods aim at approaching a high-dimensional model with a low-dimensional one. Their efficiencies, in terms of accuracy, complexity reduction, and CPU time gains, are first discussed on a one-dimensional case of nonlinear coupled heat and mass transfer. The reduced order models compute accurate solutions of the problem when compared to the large original model. They also offer interesting complexity reduction: around 97% for the POD and 88% for the PGD on the case study. In further sections, the robustness of the reduced order models are tested for different boundary conditions and materials. The POD method has lack of accuracy to compute the solution when these parameters differ from the ones used for the learning step. It is also shown that PGD resolution is particularly efficient to reduce the complexity of parametric problems.


Articles with similar content:

HIGHER ORDER MULTIPOINT MESHLESS FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR TWO-SCALE ANALYSIS OF HETEROGENEOUS MATERIALS
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, Vol.17, 2019, issue 3
Irena Jaworska
A Comparison Between an Embedded FE2 Approach and a TFA-Like Model
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, Vol.2, 2004, issue 4
Pascale Kanoute, Frederic Feyel, Nicolas Carrere
A NUMERICAL METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF RADIATIVE HEAT TRANSFER PROBLEMS IN IRREGULAR DOMAINS WITH FRESNEL INTERFACES: AXISYMMETRIC PROBLEMS
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.16, 2004, issue
V. M. Mamedov, V. S. Yuferev, Sergey Rukolaine
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE-BASED MIXED MULTISCALE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND APPLICATIONS IN STOCHASTIC TWO-PHASE FLOWS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.4, 2014, issue 6
Guang Lin, Yalchin Efendiev, Lijian Jiang, Jia Wei
THE INTEGRAL TRANSFORM METHOD IN COMPUTATIONAL HEAT AND FLUID FLOW
International Heat Transfer Conference 10, Vol.1, 1994, issue
Renato M. Cotta