Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer
Impact-faktor: 0.562 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 0.605 SJR: 0.211 SNIP: 0.361 CiteScore™: 0.33

ISSN Druckformat: 1065-5131
ISSN Online: 1563-5074

Volumen 26, 2019 Volumen 25, 2018 Volumen 24, 2017 Volumen 23, 2016 Volumen 22, 2015 Volumen 21, 2014 Volumen 20, 2013 Volumen 19, 2012 Volumen 18, 2011 Volumen 17, 2010 Volumen 16, 2009 Volumen 15, 2008 Volumen 14, 2007 Volumen 13, 2006 Volumen 12, 2005 Volumen 11, 2004 Volumen 10, 2003 Volumen 9, 2002 Volumen 8, 2001 Volumen 7, 2000 Volumen 6, 1999 Volumen 5, 1998 Volumen 4, 1997 Volumen 3, 1996 Volumen 2, 1995 Volumen 1, 1994

Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer

DOI: 10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.2015012277
pages 397-405


Himanshu M. Joshi
Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc., 3333 Highway 6 South, Houston TX 77082
David J. Kukulka
Rigidized Metals Corp., Buffalo, NY 14203
Srikanth Kummari
Shell India Markets Pvt. Ltd., India


Performance evaluation criteria (PEC) for enhanced heat transfer surfaces enable evaluation of the benefits of heat transfer augmentation relative to the increase in pressure drop as well as maximization of a performance objective for a given set of constraints. The objective can be increasing the heat duty or reducing the size of a heat exchanger, minimizing the pumping power, or obtaining the same performance with a reduced temperature differential. Professor Arthur Bergles did pioneering work in this area and developed a methodology to apply PEC to heat exchangers with various constraints: fixed geometry, variable geometry, fixed pumping power, fixed flow rate, and fixed inlet temperatures. This paper demonstrates the application of PEC to a heat exchanger using a smooth carbon steel (mild steel) tube and an enhanced tube of the same material (Vipertex 1EHT tube). Data taken on a double-pipe heat exchanger at two tube-side flow rates were used to quantify the PEC. The evaluation shows that, depending on the applied constraints, different benefits can be obtained using Vipertex tubes−a heat duty increase of up to 19%, an 18−30% reduced flow rate to achieve the same heat duties, or a change in geometry to achieve an 8−9% increase in heat transfer at the same pumping power.