Abo Bibliothek: Guest
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification

Erscheint 6 Ausgaben pro Jahr

ISSN Druckformat: 2152-5080

ISSN Online: 2152-5099

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.7 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.9 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.5 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.0007 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.5 SJR: 0.584 SNIP: 0.676 CiteScore™:: 3 H-Index: 25

Indexed in

SCENARIO DISCOVERY WORKFLOW FOR ROBUST PETROLEUM RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Volumen 6, Ausgabe 6, 2016, pp. 533-559
DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2016018932
Get accessGet access

ABSTRAKT

Subsurface uncertainty creates large economic risks for the development of hydrocarbon reservoirs, driving the need for a decision-making procedure that is robust with respect to this uncertainty. In current practice, decisions are often made based on a single geologic scenario, and uncertainty is modeled in terms of parametric variations around best-estimate values within that scenario. In such a procedure, the impact of other possible geological scenarios upon the performance of a development plan is not explicitly evaluated. To improve decision making, reservoir models with different geological concepts (e.g., different environments of deposition) should be built to capture the full range of uncertainty. However, it is difficult to analyze the results from many models and provide summary information pertinent to business needs. In this paper, a scenario discovery-based outcome analysis workflow is described to systematically explore the result of many (50 to 10,000 or more) reservoir simulation runs. The workflow includes defining performance metrics to reflect business needs, exploring and defining outcome scenarios, searching for relationships between geological parameters and outcomes, and selecting and investigating individual representative cases. Supported by various data mining and data visualization techniques, this workflow may help decision-makers to better understand the potential business impacts of the uncertainty and develop insights concerning geological parameters that control these impacts. We present two examples of this workflow based on a subset of the SAIGUP [Manzocchi et al., Petrol. Geosci., 141(1):3−15, 2008] dataset containing 2268 reservoir simulation models, from a full factorial combination of four sedimentology parameters and three structural parameters. In the first example, we examine the shape of production profiles, demonstrating the identification of geological origins for different shapes of production curves using only a small fraction of the full factorial simulation set. In the second example, we analyze the factors influencing water breakthrough time. For both examples, we identify representative reservoir models to ground decision-making in concrete instances.

REFERENZIERT VON
  1. Maqui A. F., Zhai X.., Suarez Negreira A.., Matringe S. F., Lozada M. A., A Comprehensive Workflow for Near Real Time Waterflood Management and Production Optimization Using Reduced-Physics and Data-Driven Technologies, Day 2 Thu, May 18, 2017, 2017. Crossref

  2. Wang Shihao , Pan Zhengfu , Zhang Juncheng , Yang Zhenzhou , Wang Yonghong , Wu Yu-Shu , Li Xiaopeng , Lukyanov Alexander , On the Klinkenberg Effect of Multicomponent Gases, Day 2 Tue, October 10, 2017, 2017. Crossref

  3. Jiang Rui, Durlofsky Louis J., Implementation and detailed assessment of a GNAT reduced-order model for subsurface flow simulation, Journal of Computational Physics, 379, 2019. Crossref

  4. Arnold Dan, Demyanov Vasily, Rojas Temistocles, Christie Mike, Uncertainty Quantification in Reservoir Prediction: Part 1—Model Realism in History Matching Using Geological Prior Definitions, Mathematical Geosciences, 51, 2, 2019. Crossref

  5. Demyanov Vasily, Arnold Dan, Rojas Temistocles, Christie Mike, Uncertainty Quantification in Reservoir Prediction: Part 2—Handling Uncertainty in the Geological Scenario, Mathematical Geosciences, 51, 2, 2019. Crossref

  6. Santos Susana M.G., Gaspar Ana T.F.S., Schiozer Denis J., Managing reservoir uncertainty in petroleum field development: Defining a flexible production strategy from a set of rigid candidate strategies, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 171, 2018. Crossref

  7. Schiozer Denis José, de Souza dos Santos Antonio Alberto, de Graça Santos Susana Margarida, von Hohendorff Filho João Carlos, Model-based decision analysis applied to petroleum field development and management, Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, 74, 2019. Crossref

  8. Mohd Razak Syamil, Jafarpour Behnam, Convolutional neural networks (CNN) for feature-based model calibration under uncertain geologic scenarios, Computational Geosciences, 24, 4, 2020. Crossref

  9. Razak Syamil Mohd, Jafarpour Behnam, Conditioning generative adversarial networks on nonlinear data for subsurface flow model calibration and uncertainty quantification, Computational Geosciences, 26, 1, 2022. Crossref

  10. Meira Luis A.A., Coelho Guilherme P., da Silva Celmar G., Abreu João L.A., Santos Antonio A.S., Schiozer Denis J., Improving representativeness in a scenario reduction process to aid decision making in petroleum fields, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 184, 2020. Crossref

  11. Santos Susana M.G., Gaspar Ana T.F.S., Schiozer Denis J., Information, robustness, and flexibility to manage uncertainties in petroleum field development, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 196, 2021. Crossref

Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen Preise und Aborichtlinien Begell House Kontakt Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain