Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering
Impact-faktor: 1.016 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 1.194 SJR: 0.554 SNIP: 0.82 CiteScore™: 2

ISSN Druckformat: 1543-1649
ISSN Online: 1940-4352

International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2020035077
pages 385-407

DERIVATION OF COMPATIBILITY CONDITIONS AND NONCONSTANT MATERIAL FUNCTION FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS OF SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS

Chetan S. Jarali
Dynamics and Adaptive Structures Group, Structural Technological Division, CSIR National Aerospace Laboratories, Bengaluru-560017, Karnataka, India
Ravishankar N. Chikkangoudar
PhD Research Centre, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi-590008, Karnataka, India; Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.L.E. Dr. M.S. Sheshgiri College of Engineering and Technology, Belagavi-590008, Karnataka, India
Subhas F. Patil
Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.L.E. Dr. M.S. Sheshgiri College of Engineering and Technology, Belagavi-590008, Karnataka, India
S. Raja
Dynamics and Adaptive Structures Group, Structural Technologies Division, CSIR National Aerospace Laboratories, Bengaluru-560017, Karnataka, India
Y. Charles Lu
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Jacob Fish
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, 500 West 120th St, New York, NY 10027, USA

ABSTRAKT

The present work investigates the thermodynamic inconsistencies in the definition of the compatibility conditions on stress for constant and nonconstant material functions in one-dimensional modeling of shape memory alloys based on the first principles. In this work, simplifications are provided validating inconsistencies in the earlier proposed non-constant material functions used to satisfy compatibility conditions. It is presented that the inconsistencies originate due to an incorrect definition of the compatibility conditions on stress. In the first step, it is shown that, due to inconsistent definitions of the compatibility conditions, the material functions cannot be derived from the first principles. Consequently, it is presented that the material functions result in an incorrect form of the differential constitutive equation. Furthermore, it is also analyzed that these incorrect definitions on the compatibility conditions result in an inconsistent form of nonconstant material functions as well as the differential equation, which are proposed in earlier models. As a result, in the present work the consistent definition of the compatibility conditions for one-dimensional shape memory alloy models is derived. Next, the new and correct definition for the compatibility conditions is proposed, which is used to derive a new and consistent form of nonconstant material function. Finally, a consistent form of non-constant material function and differential equation are derived from first principles, which satisfy the new definition of compatibility conditions on stress.

REFERENZEN

  1. Auricchio, F. and Lubliner, J., A Uniaxial Model for Shape Memory Alloys, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 34, no. 27, pp. 3601-3618, 1997.

  2. Auricchio, F. and Sacco, E., A One-Dimensional Model for Superelastic Shape-Memory Alloys with Different Elastic Properties between Austenite and Martensite, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1101-1114, 1997.

  3. Auricchio, F. and Sacco, E., Thermo-Mechanical Modelling of a Superelastic Shape-Memory Wire under Cyclic Stretching-Bending Loadings, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 38, pp. 6123-6145, 2001.

  4. Auricchio, F., Marfia, S., and Sacco, E., Modelling of SMA Materials: Training and Two Way Memory Effects, Comput. Struct., vol. 81, pp. 2301-2317, 2003.

  5. Bekker, A. and Brinson, L.C., Temperature-Induced Phase Transformation in a Shape Memory Alloy: Phase Diagram based Kinetics Approach, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 949-988, 1997.

  6. Bekker, A. and Brinson, L.C., Phase Diagram based Description of the Hysteresis Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys, Acta Matter., vol. 46, pp. 3649-3665, 1998.

  7. Boyd, J.G. and Lagoudas, D.C., Thermomechanical Response of Shape Memory Composites, J. Intell. Mater. Struct., vol. 5, pp. 333-346, 1994.

  8. Boyd, J.G. and Lagoudas, D., A Thermodynamic Constitutive Model for the Shape Memory Materials. Part I. The Monolithic Shape Memory Alloy, Int. J. Plast, vol. 12, pp. 805-841, 1996.

  9. Brinson, L.C., One-Dimensional Constitutive Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys: Thermomechanical Derivation with Non-Constant Material Functions and Redefined Martensite Internal Variables, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 4, pp. 229-242, 1993.

  10. Brinson, L.C. and Huang, M.S., Simplifications and Comparisons of Shape Memory Alloy Constitutive Models, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 7, pp. 108-114, 1996.

  11. Brinson, L.C. and Panico, M., Comments to the Paper "Differential and Integrated form Consistency in 1-D Phenomenological Models for Shape Memory Alloy Constitutive Behavior," by V.R. Buravalla and A. Khandelwal [Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 44, pp. 4369-4381,2007], Int. J. Solids. Struct., vol. 46, pp. 217-220, 2009.

  12. Buravalla, V.R. and Khandelwal, A., Differential and Integrated Form Consistency in 1D Phenomenological Models for Shape Memory Alloy Constitutive Behavior, Int. J. Solids. Struct., vol. 44, pp. 4369-4381, 2007.

  13. Buravalla, V.R. and Khandelwal, A., Evolution Kinetics in Shape Memory Alloys under Arbitrary Loading: Experiments and Modelling, Mech. Mater., vol. 43, pp. 807-823,2011.

  14. Chemisky, Y., Duval, A., Patoor, E., and Ben Zineb, T., Constitutive Model for Shape Memory Alloys Including Phase Transformation, Martensitic Reorientation and Twins Accommodation, Mech. Mater, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 361-376, 2011.

  15. Chikkangoudar, N.R., Jarali, C.S., Raja, S., and Patil, S.F., Consistent Derivation of Non-Constant Material Function for One-Dimensional Shape Memory Alloy Phenomenological Model, Mater. Today, vol. 27, pp. 539-545, 2020.

  16. Gao, X. and Brinson, L.C., A Simplified Multivariant SMA Model based on Invariant Plane Nature of Martensitic Transformation, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 13, pp. 795-810, 2002.

  17. Gao, X., Qiao, R., and Brinson, L.C., Phase Diagram Kinetics for Shape Memory Alloys: A Robust Finite Element Implementation, Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 16, pp. 2102-2115, 2007.

  18. Islam, A.B.M. and Karadogan, E., Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of One-Dimensional Tanaka and Liang-Rogers Shape Memory Alloy Constitutive Models, Materials, vol. 12, p. 01687, 2019.

  19. Jarali, C.S., Chikkangoudar, N.R., Patil, S.F., Raja, S., Lu, Y.C., and Fish, J., Thermodynamically Consistent Approach for One-Dimensional Phenomenological Modeling of Shape Memory Alloys, Int. J. Multiscale Comput. Eng., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 429-446,2019.

  20. Kelly, A., Stebner, A.P., and Bhattacharya, K., A Micromechanics-Inspired Constitutive Model for Shape-Memory Alloys that Accounts for Initiation and Saturation of Phase Transformation, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 97, pp. 197-224, 2016.

  21. Khandelwal, A. and Buravalla, V.R., A Correction to the Brinson's Evolution Kinetics for Shape Memory Alloys, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 9, pp. 43-46, 2008.

  22. Khandan, R., Mahzoon, M., Fazelzadeh, S.A., and Ali, H., A Consistent Approach for Deriving a 1D Constitutive Equation for Shape Memory Alloys, Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 18, p. 097002, 2009.

  23. Kimiecik, M., Jones, J.W., and Daly, S., The Effect of Microstructure on Stress-Induced Martensitic Transformation under Cyclic Loading in the SMA Nickel-Titanium, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 89, pp. 16-30, 2016.

  24. Lagoudas, D.C., Entchev, P.B., Popov, P., Patoor, E., Brinson, L.C., and Gao, X., Shape Memory Alloys, Part II: Modeling of Polycrystals, Mech. Mater., vol. 38, pp. 430-462,2006.

  25. Leclercq, S. and Lexcellent, C., A General Macroscopic Description of the Thermomechanical Behaviour of Shape Memory Alloys, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 953-980,1996.

  26. Liang, C. and Rogers, C.A., One-Dimensional Thermomechanical Constitutive Relations for Shape Memory Materials, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 207-234,1990.

  27. Liang, C. and Rogers, C.A., A Multi-Dimensional Constitutive Model for Shape Memory Alloys, J. Eng. Math., vol. 26, pp. 429-443, 1992.

  28. Li, Y., Cui, L.S., Xu, H.B., and Yang, D.Z., Constrained Phase-Transformation of a TiNi Shape-Memory Alloy, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, vol. 34A, pp. 219-223, 2003.

  29. Lobo, P.S., Almeida, J., and Guerreiro, L., Shape Memory Alloys Behaviour: A Review, Proc. Eng., vol. 114, pp. 776-783,2015.

  30. Niyonzima, I., Jiao, Y., and Fish, J., Modeling and Simulation of Nonlinear Electro-Thermo-Mechanical Continua with Application to Shape Memory Polymeric Medical Devices, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 350, pp. 511-534, 2019.

  31. Oslen, J.S., Van der Eijk, C., and Zhang, Z.L., Numerical Analysis of a New SMA-Based Seismic Damper System and Material Characterization of Two Commercial NiTi-Alloys, Smart Struct. Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 137-152, 2008.

  32. Panico, M. and Brinson, L.C., A Three-Dimensional Phenomenological Model for Martensite Reorientation in Shape Memory Alloys, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 55, pp. 2491-2511, 2007.

  33. Qiao, L. and Radovitzky, R., Computational Modeling of Size-Dependent Superelasticity of Shape Memory Alloys, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 93, pp. 93-117, 2016.

  34. Raniecki, B. and Lexcellent, Ch., Thermodynamics of Isotropic Pseudoelasticity in Shape Memory Alloys, Eur. J. Mech, A/Solids, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 185-205, 1998.

  35. Sun, Q.P. and Hwang, K.C., Micromechanics Modelling for the Constitutive Behaviours of Polycrystalline Shape Memory Alloys-I. Derivation of General Relations, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 41, no. I, pp. 1-17, 1993a.

  36. Sun, Q.P. and Hwang, K.C., Micromechanics Modelling for the Constitutive Behaviours of Polycrystalline Shape Memory Alloys-II. Study of the Individual Phenomena, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 41, no. I, pp. 19-33, 1993b.

  37. Tanaka, K., A Thermomechanical Sketch of Shape Memory Effect: One-Dimensional Tensile Behaviour, Res. Mech, vol. 18, pp. 251-263, 1986.

  38. Tanaka, K., Nishimura, H., Tobushi, F., Oberaigner, E.R., and Fischer, F.D., Therrnomechanical Behavior of a Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloy: Transformation Conditions and Hystereses, J. Phys. IV, vol. 5, pp. C8-463-C8-468, 1995.

  39. Yu, C., Kang, G., and Kan, Q., A Micromechanical Constitutive Model for Anisotropic Cyclic Deformation of Super-Elastic NiTi Shape Memory Alloy Single Crystals, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 18, pp. 97-136,2015.


Articles with similar content:

THERMODYNAMICALLY CONSISTENT APPROACH FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELING OF SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, Vol.17, 2019, issue 4
Y. Charles Lu, Chetan S. Jarali, S. Raja, Ravishankar N. Chikkangoudar, Jacob Fish, Subhas F. Patil
GEOMETRIC ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF INCOMPATIBLE DEFORMATIONS. PART II. STRAIN AND STRESS MEASURES
Nanoscience and Technology: An International Journal, Vol.10, 2019, issue 2
S. A. Lychev, K. G. Koifman
Factorizing about the Imaginary Axis Matrices Which Do Not Satisfy the Coercitivity
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.28, 1996, issue 5-6
Vladimir B. Larin
Identification of the Hydraulic Properties of Heterogeneous Rocks from Laboratory Flow-Pump Experiments
Journal of Porous Media, Vol.10, 2007, issue 1
Daniel Lesnic, Lionel Elliott, Radu Mustata, Derek B. Ingham, Simon D. Harris, M. Ben Clennell
Complexity of Bayesian Procedure of Inductive Inference. Discrete Case
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.38, 2006, issue 11
Boris A. Beletskiy, Alexandra A. Vagis, Nikita A. Gupal, Sergey V. Vasilyev