Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Atomization and Sprays
Impact-faktor: 1.737 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Druckformat: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 30, 2020 Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2019030744
pages 331-349

TIME-AVERAGED SPRAY ANALYSIS IN THE NEAR-FIELD REGION USING BROADBAND AND NARROWBAND X-RAY MEASUREMENTS

Danyu Li
Center for Multiphase Flow Research and Education, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, USA
Julie K. Bothell
Center for Multiphase Flow Research and Education, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, USA
Timothy B. Morgan
Center for Multiphase Flow Research and Education, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, USA
Nathanaël Machicoane
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2600, USA
Alberto Aliseda
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2600, USA
Alan L. Kastengren
X-Ray Science Division, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, USA
Theodore (Ted) Heindel
Iowa State University

ABSTRAKT

The characterization of a spray in the near-field region is challenging because of its high optical density in this region. X-ray based techniques, with weak scatter and strong penetration properties, can provide better characterization than optical assessment techniques in this region. In this work, the effects of various operating parameters on the optical depth (defined as the accumulated liquid thickness in the beam path times the X-ray attenuation coefficient) and spray profile of an atomizing spray in the near-field region are evaluated based on time-averaged X-ray analysis techniques. Controlling parameters in the spray structure include swirl ratio, liquid phase Reynolds number, and gas phase Reynolds number. Data from the broadband X-ray radiographs obtained using a tube source at Iowa State University and from focused beam measurements at the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory are compared. The X-ray tube source at Iowa State University was operated at two different energy levels, which reveals that the X-ray tube source energy influenced the magnitude of the optical depth but did not change the shape of the distribution. For the no swirl condition, gas flow rate and liquid flow rate had opposite effects on the spray profile, where the spray widens as the gas flow rate increases and narrows as the liquid flow rate increases. As the swirl ratio increases from 0 to 1, the spray widens and then narrows. The critical swirl ratio at which the spray reaches its widest spread differs at different flow conditions.

REFERENZEN

  1. Ali, K. and Bilal, S., Surface Tensions and Thermodynamic Parameters of Surface Formation of Aqueous Salt Solutions: III. Aqueous Solution of KCl, KBr, and KI, Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, vol. 337,nos. 1-3,pp. 194-199,2009.

  2. Boas, F.E. and Fleischmann, D., CT Artifacts: Causes and Reduction Techniques, Imaging Med, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 229-240,2012.

  3. Bothell, J.K., Li, D., Morgan, T.B., Heindel, T. J., Aliseda, A., Machicoane, N., and Kastengren, A.L., Characterizing the Near-Field Region of a Spray Using White Beam and Focus Beam X-Ray Measurements, ICLASS 2018, 14th Triennial Int. Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Chicago, IL, 2018.

  4. Bothell, J.K., Machicoane, N., Li, D., Morgan, T.B., Aliseda, A., Kastengren, A.L., and Heindel, T.J., Experimental Techniques for the Near-Field Spray Region, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 2019 (in review).

  5. Faeth, G.M., Structure and Atomization Properties of Dense Turbulent Sprays, Symposium (International) on Combustion, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1345-1352,1991.

  6. Halls, B.R., Heindel, T.J., Kastengren, A.L., and Meyer, T.R., Evaluation of X-Ray Sources for Quantitative Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging of Liquid Mass Distribution in Atomizing Sprays, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 59, pp. 113-120,2014a.

  7. Halls, B.R., Heindel, T.J., Meyer, T.R., and Kastengren, A.L., X-Ray Spray Diagnostics: Comparing Sources and Techniques, 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 2012-1055, Nashville, TN, 2012.

  8. Halls, B.R., Morgan, T.B., Heindel, T.J., Meyer, T.R., and Kastengren, A.L., High-Speed Radiographic Spray Imaging with a Broadband Tube Source, AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition 2014, National Harbor, MD, 2014b.

  9. Heindel, T.J., A Review of X-Ray Flow Visualization with Applications to Multiphase Flows, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 133, no. 7, p. 074001,2011.

  10. Heindel, T.J., X-Ray Imaging Techniques to Quantify Spray Characteristics in the near Field, Atomization Sprays, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1029-1059,2018.

  11. Heindel, T. J., Gray, J.N., and Jensen, T.C., An X-Ray System for Visualizing Fluid Flows, Flow Measure. Instrument., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 67-78,2008.

  12. Hopfinger, E.J. andLasheras, J.C., Explosive Breakup of a Liquid Jet by a Swirling Coaxial Gas Jet, Phys. Fluids, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1696-1698,1996.

  13. Hsieh, J., Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, 2003.

  14. Huck, P.D., Machicoane, N., Osuna-Orozco, R., and Aliseda, A., Experimental Characterization of a Canonical Two-Fluid Coaxial Atomizer, ICLASS 2018, 14th Triennial Int. Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Chicago, IL, 2018.

  15. Kastengren, A.L. and Powell, C.F., Synchrotron X-Ray Techniques for Fluid Dynamics, Experiments Fluids, vol. 55, no. 3, p. 1686,2014a.

  16. Kastengren, A.L., Powell, C.F., Arms, D., Dufresne, E.M., Gibson, H., and Wang, J., The 7BM Beamline at the APS: A Facility for Time-Resolved Fluid Dynamics Measurements, J. Synchrotron Rad., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 654-657,2012.

  17. Kastengren, A.L., Powell, C.F., Wang, Y., Im, K.S., and Wang, J., X-Ray Radiography Measurements of Diesel Spray Structure at Engine-Like Ambient Density, Atomization Sprays, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1031-1044, 2009.

  18. Kastengren, A.L., Tilocco, F.Z., Duke, D., Powell, C.F., Zhang, X., and Moon, S., Time-Resolved X-Ray Radiography of Sprays from Engine Combustion Network Spray a Diesel Injector, Atomization Sprays, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 251-272,2014b.

  19. Kingston, T.A., Morgan, T.B., Geick, T.A., Robinson, T.R., and Heindel, T.J., A Cone-Beam Compensated Back-Projection Algorithm for X-Ray Particle Tracking Velocimetry, Flow Measure. Instrument., vol. 39, pp. 64-75,2014.

  20. Li, D., Bothell, J.K., Morgan, T.B., Heindel, T.J., Aliseda, A., Machicoane, N., and Kastengren, A.L., Quantitative Analysis of an Airblast Atomizer in the near-Field Region Using Broadband and Narrowband X-Ray Measurements, ICLASS 2018, 14th Triennial Int. Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Chicago, IL, 2018.

  21. Machicoane, N., Bothell, J.K., Li, D., Morgan, T.B., Heindel, T.J., Kastengren, A.L., and Aliseda, A., Synchrotron Radiography Characterization of the Liquid Core Dynamics in a Canonical Two-Fluid Coaxial Atomizer, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 115, pp. 1-8,2019.

  22. MacPhee, A.G., Tate, M.W., Powell, C.F., Yue, Y., Renzi, M.J., Ercan, A., Narayanan, S., Fontes, E., Walther, J., Schaller, J., and Gruner, S.M., X-Ray Imaging of Shock Waves Generated by High-Pressure Fuel Sprays, Science, vol. 295, no. 5558, pp. 1261-1263,2002.

  23. Matusik, K.E., Sforzo, B.A., Seong, H.J., Duke, D.J., Kastengren, A.L., Ilavsky, J., and Powell, C.F., X-Ray Measurements of Fuel Spray Specific Surface Area and Sauter Mean Diameter for Cavitating and Non-Cavitating Diesel Sprays, ICLASS 2018, 14th Triennial Int. Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Chicago, IL, 2018.

  24. Mishra, D.P., Planar-Laser-Influenced Fluorescence Method, in Experimental Combustion: An Introduction, Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, pp. 300-306,2014.

  25. Pedrotti, F.L., Pedrotti, L.S., and Pedrotti, L.M., Introduction to Optics, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.

  26. Powell, C.F., Yue, Y., Poola, R., and Wang, J., Time-Resolved Measurements of Supersonic Fuel Sprays Using Synchrotron X-Rays, J. Synchrotron Rad., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 356-360,2000.

  27. Pukelsheim F., The Three Sigma Rule, American Statistician, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 88-91,1994.

  28. Radke, C.D., Heindel, T. J., and Meyer, T.R., Effect of Injector Exit Geometry on Atomization of a Liquid-Liquid Double Swirl Coaxial Injector Using Non-Invasive Laser, Optical, and X-Ray Techniques, 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf, Cleveland, OH, 2014.

  29. Som, S., and Aggarwal, S.K., Effects of Primary Breakup Modelling on Spray and Combustion Characteristics of Compression Ignition Engines, Combust. Flame, vol. 157,no. 6,pp. 1179-1193,2010.

  30. University of Washington, A Canonical Two-Fluid Coaxial Atomizer, Multiphase & Cardiovascular Flow Lab, accessed 2016, from http://depts.washington.edu/fluidlab/nozzle.shtml, 2011.

  31. Yue, Y., Powell, C.F., Poola, R., Wang, J., and Schaller, J.K., Quantitative Measurements of Diesel Fuel Spray Characteristics in the Near-Nozzle Region Using X-Ray Absorption, Atomization Sprays, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 471-490,2001.


Articles with similar content:

UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR LIQUID PENETRATION OF EVAPORATING SPRAYS AT DIESEL-LIKE CONDITIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.25, 2015, issue 5
Caroline L. Genzale, Lyle M. Pickett, Julien Manin
CORRELATION OF INTACT-LIQUID-CORE LENGTH FOR COAXIAL INJECTORS
ICLASS 94
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Vol.0, 1994, issue
Fan Bill Cheung, R. D. Woodward, R. L. Burch, Kenneth K. Kuo
COMBUSTION BEHAVIOR OF BORON CARBIDE FUEL IN SOLID FUEL RAMJETS
International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion, Vol.2, 1993, issue 1-6
David W. Netzer, Benveniste Natan, Tae-Ho Lee, James A. Nabity
EFFERVESCENT ATOMIZER OPERATION AND SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.3, 1993, issue 2
J. D. Whitlow, Arthur H. Lefebvre
TURBULENCE FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN A SPECIAL ATOMIZER
ICLASS 94
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Vol.0, 1994, issue
Norman Chigier, Uri Shavit