Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Atomization and Sprays
Impact-faktor: 1.737 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Druckformat: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 30, 2020 Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v12.i4.30
pages 403-417

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF POSTIMPINGEMENT DIESEL SPRAY, PART I: PENETRATION AND VOLUME

Kyungnam Ko
Department of Mechanical System Engineering, School of Engineering, Gunma University, Kiryu, Japan
Masataka Arai
Division of Mechanical Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Gunma University, 1-5-1 Tenjin-cho, Kiryu, Gunma, 376-8515, Japan; Tokyo Denki University

ABSTRAKT

The characteristics of the impingement spray were experimentally investigated by comparison with those of the free spray. Diesel fuel spray injected info a high-pressure chamber in a cold state was observed by a drum camera that allowed high-speed photography. Spray penetration and volume of the impingement spray analyzed from the photographs are compared with those of the free spray. Also, the effects of injection rate and ambient pressure on the penetration and the volume of the postimpingement spray are discussed. As to the results, it was found that the injection rate and wall distance became Important factors of the diesel spray behavior with impingement. As the impingement distance was shorter, the volume of impingement spray approximately increased. Also, the volume of spray impinged before breakup was greater than that of the free spray.


Articles with similar content:

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF POSTIMPINGEMENT DIESEL SPRAY, PART II: EMPIRICAL EQUATION OF PENETRATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.12, 2002, issue 4
Masataka Arai, Kyungnam Ko
EFFECT OF INJECTION PARAMETERS ON SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS OF GAS-TO-LIQUID (GTL), BIODIESEL, AND DIESEL FUEL FOR A MULTI-HOLE INJECTOR IN A DIESEL ENGINE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.25, 2015, issue 12
Chang Sik Lee, Donggon Lee, Hyun Gu Roh, Kibong Choi
A STUDY OF THE FLOW AND ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS OF IMPINGED DIESEL SPRAY ON A CHAMBER WALL
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.17, 2007, issue 7
Chang Sik Lee, Sungwook Park, Hyun Kyu Suh
ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS OF JET-TO-JET AND SPRAY-TO-SPRAY IMPINGEMENT SYSTEMS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.9, 1999, issue 4
Masataka Arai, Masahiro Saito
DIESEL SPRAY IMPINGING ON A FLAT WALL. PART II: VOLUME AND AVERAGE AIR-FUEL RATIO OF AN IMPINGEMENT DIESEL SPRAY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.12, 2002, issue 5&6
Masataka Arai, Kyungnam Ko