Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Atomization and Sprays
Impact-faktor: 1.262 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Druckformat: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v11.i6.100
14 pages

EXPERIMENTS ON AIR-ASSIST SPRAY AND SPRAY FLAMES

Sang Heun Oh
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea
Dong Il Kim
Research Institute of Mechanical Technology, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea
Min Su Paek
Department of Energy Environment, Korea Heavy Industries, Changwon, Korea

ABSTRAKT

A detailed study of kerosene spray and spray flames is performed to investigate the spray structure using an air-assisted atomizer. A particle dynamic analyzer (PDA) is used to measure Sauter mean diameter (SMD), mean, and root-mean-square (rms) values of axial drop velocity, drop number density, and velocity–size correlations. Three representative flames are studied and measurements are made at three different axial locations from the nozzle, with and without combustion. A thermocouple is used to measure the average local temperature. Direct photographic technique is also employed to visualize the spray and flame boundaries. Detailed comparison of the spray structures in nonburning and burning conditions is presented. The presence of the flame greatly alters the spray structure, including the interaction between the two phases. Results indicate that the overall structure of an air-assisted spray flame is different from that of gaseous diffusion flames and is characteristically similar to internal group combustion mode where liquid and gas phase reactions coexist. In the primary combustion zone, however, the gas-phase reaction is dominant, exhibiting a sheath of combustion. A physical model of the structure in airblast flames is also proposed and discussed.


Articles with similar content:

SINGLE-PHASE AERODYNAMIC FLOW FIELD VALIDATION OF NOVEL AIRBLAST ATOMIZER DESIGNS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.20, 2010, issue 7
Ghasem G. Nasr, Leigh Morgan, Martin L. Burby, Andrew J. Yule
STRUCTURE OF VAPORIZING PRESSURE ATOMIZED SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.3, 1993, issue 3
G. Scott Samuelsen, Vincent McDonell
ASSESSMENT OF ATOMIZATION MODELS FOR DIESEL ENGINE SIMULATIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 9
S. Som, Suresh Aggarwal
STRUCTURE OF A NONEVAPORATING SWIRL INJECTOR SPRAY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.7, 1997, issue 1
Richard Eskridge, Douglas A. Feikema, John J. Hurt
GROUP COMBUSTION BEHAVIOUR OF DROPLETS IN A PREMIXED SPRAY FLAME
ICLASS 94
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Vol.0, 1994, issue
K. Nakabe, Yukio Mizutani, Masashi Katsuki, Fumiteru Akamatsu