Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Atomization and Sprays
Impact-faktor: 1.262 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Druckformat: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v12.i123.30
pages 49-67

BREAKUP AND ATOMIZATION OF A KEROSENE JET IN CROSSFLOWAT ELEVATED PRESSURE

Julian Becker
DLR—German Aerospace Center, Institute of Propulsion Technology, Cologne, Germany
Christoph Hassa
German Aerospace Center−DLR, Institute of Propulsion Technology, Linder Hohe, 51147 Cologne, Germany

ABSTRAKT

The breakup, penetration, and atomization of a plain jet of kerosene jet A-1 fuel in a nonswirling crossflow of air 'were investigated experimentally at test conditions relevant to lean, premised, pre-vaporized (LPP) combustion for gas turbines. Measurement techniques employed include time-resolved shadowgraphs, Mie-scattering laser lightsheets, and phase Doppler anemometry (PDA). The nozzle diameter was 0.45 mm and its L/D ratio was 1.56. Air velocities lay between 50 and 100 m/s, the air pressure range extended from 1.5 to 15 bar, and the air temperature was around 290 К. Fuel flow rates were chosen so that the fuel-to-air momentum flux ratio q(= rliqU2liq/rairU2air assumed mainly values between 2 and 18. Two different mechanisms of jet breakup could be discerned, and correlations for the jet penetration and lateral dispersion close to the nozzle were derived. Furthermore, the penetration of the spray plume and its representative droplet diameters were determined. Finally, a simple, approximate model to predict liquid fuel penetration is presented.


Articles with similar content:

CHARACTERIZATION OF PROTOTYPE HIGH-PRESSURE SWIRL INJECTOR NOZZLES, PART I: PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.10, 2000, issue 2
Sangmin Choi, Changsoo Jang, Choongsik Bae
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PHENOMENON OF OIL BREAKUP IN AN ENGINE CRANKCASE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.20, 2010, issue 9
Morgan R. Heikal, Steven M. Begg, G. de Sercey, Y. Mamiya, Nicolas Miche, R. Gilchrist, Y. Noda, Y. Tsuruoka
ANALYSIS OF HOLLOW-CONE SPRAY INJECTED IN AN UNCONFINED, ISOTHERMAL, COANNULAR SWIRLING JET ENVIRONMENT
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.27, 2017, issue 1
Kuppuraj Rajamanickam, Dilip Sanadi, Saptarshi Basu
ATOMIZATION OF CROSS-INJECTING SPRAYS INTO CONVECTIVE AIR STREAM
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.5, 1995, issue 4&5
Kenneth D. Kihm, S. Y. Son, G. M. Lyn
AN EXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF THE SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS OF AN INTERMITTENT AIR-ASSISTED FUEL INJECTOR
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.10, 2000, issue 2
Sangmin Choi, Changsoo Jang, Sung-Soo Kim