Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal
SJR: 0.123

ISSN Druckformat: 2151-805X
ISSN Online: 2151-8068

Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal

DOI: 10.1615/EthicsBiologyEngMed.2015015333
pages 37-41

Minding Brain Science in Medicine: On the Need for Neuroethical Engagement for Guidance of Neuroscience in Clinical Contexts

James Giordano
Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry, and the Neuroethics Studies Program, Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.
John R. Shook
Department of Philosophy, and Graduate School of Education, University at Buffalo, Buffalo New York, USA

ABSTRAKT

The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (PCSBI) released the second volume of its Gray Matters report in March 2015 to address neuroethical, legal, and social issues arising in and from efforts of the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative. In concert with recommendations made in the Gray Matters volumes, we herein offer what we believe to be four crucial−and actionable−goals for neuroethics: First, neuroethics should be dedicated to evaluating the validity and value of current and proposed approaches to assessing and altering the structure and functions of the brain. Second, neuroethical tools and methods must be developed to interpret, and enable sound use of neuroscientific information, techniques, and technologies in biomedical research and clinical practice. Third, neuroethics should use newly emerging neuroscientific findings to inform common conceptions and definitions of the normal structure and functions of the brain, and how the brain should be treated to recover or improve its functional capacities. Fourth, neuroethics should be prominently featured in the education and training of researchers and clinicians, so as to enable more pragmatic and ethically prudent capability in laboratory and clinical settings, as well as policy- and public-oriented fields, organizations, and agencies.


Articles with similar content:

Abstract of "New Tools to Address Responsible Conduct of Nanobiotechnological Research"
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.18, 2008, issue 1
Daniel A. Vallero
eHealth Ethics: The Online Medical Marketplace and Emerging Ethical Issues
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.2, 2011, issue 3
Bryan Liang, Timothy K. Mackey, Kimberly M. Lovett
ONLINE AND DESIGN-BASED LEARNING IN SOPHOMORE ENGINEERING MECHANICS
International Journal on Innovations in Online Education, Vol.2, 2018, issue 3
Akif Kaynak, John M. Long, Mariana Paulino, Siva Chandrasekaran
Muscle-Based Gene Therapy and Tissue Engineering
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.11, 2001, issue 1-3
Nobuo Adachi, Dalip Pelinkovic, Johnny Huard, Joon Yung Lee
Decision Technologies in Medical Research and Practice: Practical Considerations, Ethical Implications, and the Need for Dialectic Evaluation
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.4, 2013, issue 2
Herbert Plischke, Nikola B. Kohls, James Giordano, Philipp Novotny, Peyton Paulick, P. Justin Rossi