Library Subscription: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN Print: 0278-940X
ISSN Online: 1943-619X

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v39.i1.20
pages 5-28

Brain-Machine Interfaces: Electrophysiological Challenges and Limitations

Bradley C. Lega
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania
Mijail D. Serruya
Department of Neurology, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Kareem Zaghloul
Surgical Neurology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda

ABSTRACT

Brain-machine interfaces (BMI) seek to directly communicate with the human nervous system in order to diagnose and treat intrinsic neurological disorders. While the first generation of these devices has realized significant clinical successes, they often rely on gross electrical stimulation using empirically derived parameters through open-loop mechanisms of action that are not yet fully understood. Their limitations reflect the inherent challenge in developing the next generation of these devices. This review identifies lessons learned from the first generation of BMI devices (chiefly deep brain stimulation), identifying key problems for which the solutions will aid the development of the next generation of technologies. Our analysis examines four hypotheses for the mechanism by which brain stimulation alters surrounding neurophysiologic activity. We then focus on motor prosthetics, describing various approaches to overcoming the problems of decoding neural signals. We next turn to visual prosthetics, an area for which the challenges of signal coding to match neural architecture has been partially overcome. Finally, we close with a review of cortical stimulation, examining basic principles that will be incorporated into the design of future devices. Throughout the review, we relate the issues of each specific topic to the common thread of BMI research: translating new knowledge of network neuroscience into improved devices for neuromodulation.


Articles with similar content:

Chronic Pain: We Should Not Underestimate the Contribution of Neural Plasticity
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.26, 2014, issue 1-2
David A. Rice, Gwyn N. Lewis
Microstimulation: Principles, Techniques, and Approaches to Somatosensory Neuroprosthesis
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.43, 2015, issue 1
Mulugeta Semework
The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.44, 2016, issue 1-2
Mijail D. Serruya, D. Kacy Cullen, Dayo O. Adewole, H. Isaac Chen, Justin C. Burrell, James P. Harris, Dmitriy Petrov, John A. Wolf
Methods for Assessing Adequacy of Anesthesia
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.30, 2002, issue 1-3
Mark van Gils, Arvi Yli-Hankala, Ilkka Korhonen
Procedures for Evaluating the Adequacy of Anesthesia
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.45, 2017, issue 1-6
Mark van Gils, Arvi Yli-Hankala, Ilkka Korhonen