Library Subscription: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
SJR: 0.121 SNIP: 0.228 CiteScore™: 0.17

ISSN Print: 0896-2960
ISSN Online: 2162-6553

Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.2017021233
pages 263-270

Normal Passive Range of Motion for Supine Cervical Extension in a Symptom-Free Population

James A. Dauber
School of Physical Therapy, Marshall University, Huntington, WV
Melissa A. Kahlig
Atrium Medical Center, Middletown, OH
Karlen M. Vinci
Marshall University, School of Physical Therapy, Huntington, WV
Cameron R. Yoho
Healthsouth Rehab Hospital, Huntington, WV

ABSTRACT

Background: The normal range of motion (ROM) for extension of the cervical spine in the supine position, which is sometimes used in manual therapy, has not been established. Objective: To establish normal ROM for cervical extension in the supine position, across the adult lifespan. Materials and Methods: Fifty adults (25 male, 25 female) were measured for cervical extension ROM in sitting and in supine. Ten subjects (5 male, 5 female) were measured in each 10 year age range from 20 to 69 years. Results: The overall mean for supine extension ROM was 82.55° (range, 46.00°–114.00°). A mean reduction in ROM of 18.93° was noted across lifespan, and a mean increase of ROM of 7.86° was noted in supine compared to sitting. No significant differences were noted based on gender or body mass index. Conclusion: Assessment in sitting may not adequately inform the clinician regarding true extension ROM, and may lead to false-positive findings on examination. Clinicians should expect to see reduced ROM in older patients but should not expect to see significant differences based on gender.


Articles with similar content:

Review of Lower Extremity Function Following SEMLS in Children with Cerebral Palsy
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.31, 2019, issue 2
Ashok Johari, Sailaxmi Ganesan, Triveni Shetty, Rajani Mullerpatan
10-Year Evaluation of the Cementless Low-Contact- Stress Rotating-Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.19, 2009, issue 4
Vassilios Nikolaou, Demetrios S. Korres, Olga D. Savvidou, Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos, Stergios N. Lallos, Nikolaos E. Efstathopoulos, Andreas F. Mavrogenis
Segmental Kinematics and Adjacent Level Degeneration Following Disc Replacement versus Fusion: RCT with Three Years of Follow-Up
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.17, 2007, issue 3
B. Ishak, D. Pape, W. I. Steudel, Ah. Nabhan, Abdullah Nabhan
Limb Salvage Surgery Using the Intramedullary Diaphyseal Segmental Defect Fixation System
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.18, 2008, issue 1
Vasileios I. Sakellariou
Nerve Transfer or Musculotendinous Transfer for Elbow Flexion: What Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.24, 2012, issue 3-4
Wendy K.Y. Ng, Manraj Nirmal Kaur, Sophocles H. Voineskos, Achilleas Thoma