Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
SJR: 0.468 SNIP: 0.905 CiteScore™: 1.65

ISSN Imprimir: 1072-8325
ISSN En Línea: 1940-431X

Volumes:
Volumen 26, 2020 Volumen 25, 2019 Volumen 24, 2018 Volumen 23, 2017 Volumen 22, 2016 Volumen 21, 2015 Volumen 20, 2014 Volumen 19, 2013 Volumen 18, 2012 Volumen 17, 2011 Volumen 16, 2010 Volumen 15, 2009 Volumen 14, 2008 Volumen 13, 2007 Volumen 12, 2006 Volumen 11, 2005 Volumen 10, 2004 Volumen 9, 2003 Volumen 8, 2002 Volumen 7, 2001 Volumen 6, 2000 Volumen 5, 1999 Volumen 4, 1998 Volumen 3, 1997 Volumen 2, 1995 Volumen 1, 1994

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v5.i4.60
pages 365-405

ENGINEERING GENDER−GENDERING ENGINEERING: A CULTURAL MODEL FOR BELONGING

Karen L. Tonso
Wayne State University, College of Education #317, Detroid, MI 48202

SINOPSIS

This study describes women's places in an engineering campus culture, discussing (a) how students talked about kinds of student engineers, (b) how cultural identity terms encoded categories for belonging, (c) how teamwork and in-class interactions between and among student engineers cohered to cultural practices, and (d) how the campus-wide system reinforced cultural pasts. In spite of the vast majority of student engineers and faculty espousing progressive ideals for women's full inclusion and for treating women with respect, women's places at Public Engineering School were severely restricted. Women belonged only in the social arenas of Greek societies, not as engineers. Women's experiences on student teams varied in direct relation to the extent to which their male teammates engaged high-status (academic-science-affiliated) cultural identities. The cultural model of campus life marked an intersection of academic science with a culture of romance, but virulent sexist practices flowed with and through the prestige of academic science practices. By producing hierarchical forms of womanhood and manhood appropriate to the campus system, Public Engineering School's engineering education system produced women's subordination.


Articles with similar content:

INTERNATIONAL FEMALE GRADUATE STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING AT A U.S. UNIVERSITY: SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST?
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.3, 1997, issue 4
Renata Frank de Verthelyi
KEEPING THE GIRLS VISIBLE IN K−12 SCIENCE EDUCATION REFORM EFFORTS: A FEMINIST CASE STUDY ON PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.18, 2012, issue 2
Nicole M. Beeman-Cadwallader, Gayle A. Buck, Amy E. Trauth-Nare
"DO THEY EVEN HAVE THAT ANYMORE": THE IMPACT OF REDESIGNING A MINORITY ENGINEERING PROGRAM
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.18, 2012, issue 3
Teri J. Murphy, Randa Shehab, Cindy E. Foor
DIVERSIFYING BIOMEDICAL TRAINING: A SYNERGISTIC INTERVENTION
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.16, 2010, issue 3
Hal Broxmeyer, David S. Wilkes, Sherry Queener, Michael Sturek, Simon J. Rhodes, Ann Roman, Randy R. Brutkiewicz, Janice Blum, Gina Sanchez Gibau, Julie Foertsch
EXPLORING LATINA FIRST-GENERATION COLLEGE STUDENTS’ MULTIPLE IDENTITIES, SELF-EFFICACY, AND INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRATION TO INFORM ACHIEVEMENT IN ENGINEERING
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.24, 2018, issue 3
Allison Godwin, Dina Verdin