Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Journal of Porous Media
Factor de Impacto: 1.49 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 1.159 SJR: 0.504 SNIP: 0.671 CiteScore™: 1.58

ISSN Imprimir: 1091-028X
ISSN En Línea: 1934-0508

Volumes:
Volumen 22, 2019 Volumen 21, 2018 Volumen 20, 2017 Volumen 19, 2016 Volumen 18, 2015 Volumen 17, 2014 Volumen 16, 2013 Volumen 15, 2012 Volumen 14, 2011 Volumen 13, 2010 Volumen 12, 2009 Volumen 11, 2008 Volumen 10, 2007 Volumen 9, 2006 Volumen 8, 2005 Volumen 7, 2004 Volumen 6, 2003 Volumen 5, 2002 Volumen 4, 2001 Volumen 3, 2000 Volumen 2, 1999 Volumen 1, 1998

Journal of Porous Media

DOI: 10.1615/JPorMedia.v19.i5.30
pages 405-422

IMPROVEMENT OF PERMEABILITY MODELS USING LARGE MERCURY INJECTION CAPILLARY PRESSURE DATASET FOR MIDDLE EAST CARBONATE RESERVOIRS

Hasan A. Nooruddin
Saudi Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
M. Enamul Hossain
Department of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia; Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Hasan Al-Yousef
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Taha Okasha
Saudi Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

SINOPSIS

In this study, eight permeability models are calibrated to a large mercury injection capillary pressure dataset obtained from the Middle East region. The permeability models are: Purcell, Thomeer, Winland, Swanson, Pittman, Huet, Dastidar, in addition to the Buiting-Clerke permeability models. The coefficients of the models have been determined using three different regression techniques: ordinary nonlinear least-squares regression, weighted nonlinear regression, and multiple regressions of nonlinear models after linearization. Using the original and adjusted coefficients, permeability values were estimated and compared to the actual data. Comprehensive statistical and graphical comparison is made between the different regression techniques. The study indicates that, in general, permeability models with published constants produce high errors. Major improvements in results, however, have been accomplished when using the generalized permeability models with their calibrated coefficients. The modified Winland and Swanson models show the best prediction performance. In addition, the modified Purcell model shows a significant improvement with the updated parameters. This study enhances the estimation of absolute permeability and hence better reservoir description.


Articles with similar content:

IMPLEMENTING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTING CAPILLARY PRESSURE IN RESERVOIR ROCKS
Special Topics & Reviews in Porous Media: An International Journal, Vol.4, 2013, issue 4
Farshid Torabi, Ali Abedini
The Performance of Miscible Enhanced Oil Recovery Displacements in Geostatistically Generated Permeable Media Using Horizontal Wells
Journal of Porous Media, Vol.4, 2001, issue 2
Ridha B. Gharbi, Ali A. Garrouch
TRANSIENT PRODUCTION DECLINE BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS FOR A MULTI-FRACTURED HORIZONTAL WELL WITH DISCRETE FRACTURE NETWORKS IN SHALE GAS RESERVOIRS
Journal of Porous Media, Vol.22, 2019, issue 3
Mingqiang Wei, Yonggang Duan, Mingzhe Dong, Morteza Dejam, Quantang Fang
DEPENDENCE OF SINGLE-PHASE AND MULTIPHASE PERMEABILITY ON CAPILLARY PRESSURE: A UNIFIED APPROACH
Journal of Porous Media, Vol.14, 2011, issue 12
Ned Djilali, B. Markicevic
A NEW CORRELATION TO ESTIMATE PERMEABILITY IN CARBONATE ROCKS USING MERCURY INJECTION CAPILLARY PRESSURE DATA
Special Topics & Reviews in Porous Media: An International Journal, Vol.4, 2013, issue 1
Emad Roayaei, Sadegh Fathollahi, Mohammad Ahmadi, Amin Ghafory