Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN Imprimir: 0278-940X
ISSN En Línea: 1943-619X

Volumes:
Volumen 47, 2019 Volumen 46, 2018 Volumen 45, 2017 Volumen 44, 2016 Volumen 43, 2015 Volumen 42, 2014 Volumen 41, 2013 Volumen 40, 2012 Volumen 39, 2011 Volumen 38, 2010 Volumen 37, 2009 Volumen 36, 2008 Volumen 35, 2007 Volumen 34, 2006 Volumen 33, 2005 Volumen 32, 2004 Volumen 31, 2003 Volumen 30, 2002 Volumen 29, 2001 Volumen 28, 2000 Volumen 27, 1999 Volumen 26, 1998 Volumen 25, 1997 Volumen 24, 1996 Volumen 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v45.i1-6.100
pages 121-146

Procedures for Evaluating the Adequacy of Anesthesia

Mark van Gils
VTT Information Technology, Tampere, Finland
Ilkka Korhonen
VTT Information Technology, Tampere, Finland
Arvi Yli-Hankala
Department of Anaesthesiology. Medical School, University of Tampere, and Department of Anaesthesia, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

SINOPSIS

Assessing adequacy of anesthesia requires evaluation of its components: hypnosis, analgesia, and neuromuscular transmission. In order to do this, many methods have been developed that process signals representing different modalities. Assessment of hypnosis requires cortical measures of the central nervous system (CNS); methods that assess analgesia concentrate on subcortical and spinal levels of the CNS; and neuromuscular transmission is a peripheral phenomenon. This article presents an overview of the current state of methods available for measuring each of these components. We conclude that, whereas important gains have been made in the area of assessment of hypnosis, mainly owing to the advancement of methods using EEG and auditory evoked potentials, and whereas neuromuscular transmission can be objectively monitored using motor nerve stimulation, assessment of analgesia still contains many challenges.


Articles with similar content:

Methods for Assessing Adequacy of Anesthesia
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.30, 2002, issue 1-3
Mark van Gils, Arvi Yli-Hankala, Ilkka Korhonen
Adjunctive Cosmetic Procedures During Rhinoplasty and Sinus Surgery
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.13, 2003, issue 3
Daniel G. Becker
IMPROVING THE RELIABILITY OF RHINOMANOMETRY DIAGNOSTICS BY CONSIDERING STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEASURED SIGNALS
Telecommunications and Radio Engineering, Vol.73, 2014, issue 7
O. G. Avrunin
Measurement of Impairments and Functional Limitations in Older Adults: Conceptual Considerations and Practical Applications
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.14, 2002, issue 2
Cheryl Riegger-Krugh, A. A. Manko, Toni M. Cutson, Susan Scherer, Margaret Schenkman
Prediction of Outcomes Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.26, 2014, issue 1-2
Richard Seemann