Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN Imprimir: 0278-940X
ISSN En Línea: 1943-619X

Volumes:
Volumen 47, 2019 Volumen 46, 2018 Volumen 45, 2017 Volumen 44, 2016 Volumen 43, 2015 Volumen 42, 2014 Volumen 41, 2013 Volumen 40, 2012 Volumen 39, 2011 Volumen 38, 2010 Volumen 37, 2009 Volumen 36, 2008 Volumen 35, 2007 Volumen 34, 2006 Volumen 33, 2005 Volumen 32, 2004 Volumen 31, 2003 Volumen 30, 2002 Volumen 29, 2001 Volumen 28, 2000 Volumen 27, 1999 Volumen 26, 1998 Volumen 25, 1997 Volumen 24, 1996 Volumen 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2019026454
pages 59-99

Rationale and Options for Choosing an Optimal Closure Technique for Primary Midsagittal Osteochondrotomy of the Sternum. Part 3: Technical Decision Making Based on the Practice of Patient- Appropriate Medicine

Harjeet Singh Gandhi
Hamilton Health Sciences, Suite 515, 644 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 1A1

SINOPSIS

The topographic anatomy of the sternum is similar in a healthy population. However, in a clinical subset of patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, high body mass index, chronic renal disease, or age-related osteoporosis, there are significant changes in the normal physiology that may influence overall patient outcome following trans-sternal intrathoracic surgery. These changes can create technical difficulties in reconstructing the bisected sternum and adversely affect the biomechanics of the thoracic wall, forcing difficult surgical choices with regard to implant options and increasing the cost of an otherwise routine cardiac surgery. A thorough preoperative surgical and technical planning is essential to avert perioperative complications such as failure of wound healing, non-union of the sternum, and life-threatening mediastinitis. Patient expectations need to be explored and the patients should be well informed so that they can make knowledgeable choices regarding their illness and surgical interventions. They should also be given a probable prognosis to provide psychological support. Within the realm of clinical methodology, the concept of patient-appropriate medicine is introduced to direct attending team to become aware of overall health of its patient. The inclusion of a clinical biomechanical engineer as a surgical team member is recommended to perform patient-specific finite element analysis to select an optimal implant to fix the sternum. To help assess the overall benefit–risk profile objectively, an absolute therapeutic index has been proposed.


Articles with similar content:

Post-Polio Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Clinical Management
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.7, 1995, issue 2
Lauro S. Halstead, Anne Carrington Gawne
Pathophysiology and Clinical Management on Post-Polio Syndrome
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.29, 2017, issue 1-4
Lauro S. Halstead, Anne Carrington Gawne
Looking Ahead: What Long-Term Outcomes Can We Expect from Spinal Devices for Degenerative Disc Disease
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.18, 2008, issue 4
Thomas J. Errico
Management of Bowel Dysfunction in Neurological Rehabilitation - A Review
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.19, 2007, issue 4
Raji Thomas, Barbara Chandler
Rehabilitation of Hip Fractures: a Review
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.10, 1998, issue 1
Eli Isakov, Reuben Eldar