Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN Imprimir: 0278-940X
ISSN En Línea: 1943-619X

Volumes:
Volumen 47, 2019 Volumen 46, 2018 Volumen 45, 2017 Volumen 44, 2016 Volumen 43, 2015 Volumen 42, 2014 Volumen 41, 2013 Volumen 40, 2012 Volumen 39, 2011 Volumen 38, 2010 Volumen 37, 2009 Volumen 36, 2008 Volumen 35, 2007 Volumen 34, 2006 Volumen 33, 2005 Volumen 32, 2004 Volumen 31, 2003 Volumen 30, 2002 Volumen 29, 2001 Volumen 28, 2000 Volumen 27, 1999 Volumen 26, 1998 Volumen 25, 1997 Volumen 24, 1996 Volumen 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v26.i1-2.10
pages 1-116

Power-Frequency Fields and Cancer

John E. Moulder
Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, Wl 53226

SINOPSIS

There is a widespread public perception that exposure to "EMF" is linked to cancer. This concern stems largely from a few epidemiological studies that appear to show an association between cancer and residence near power lines. However, the epidemiological evidence for such a link falls far short of that needed to conclude that a causal relationship exists, and examination of the biophysics leads to the conclusion that biological effects are implausible at the field strengths encountered in environmental settings. In a case such as this, where the epidemiological evidence for a link between an agent and a disease is weak to nonexistent and the effect is biophysically and/or biochemically implausible, laboratory evidence becomes critical for risk evaluation. The mechanisms of carcinogenesis are sufficiently well established that laboratory studies can be used to assess whether an agent has carcinogenic potential. There are approximately 100 published reports that have looked for evidence that power-frequency fields have genotoxic or epigenetic activity. These studies have found no replicated evidence that power-frequency fields have the potential to either cause or contribute to cancer. Of the few studies that have shown some evidence for carcinogenic activity, most have used exposure conditions with little relevance to real world exposure, none have been replicated, and many have failed direct attempts at replication. In conjunction with the epidemiology and biophysics, this leads to the conclusion that a causal association between power-frequency fields and cancer is not only unproven, but rather unlikely.


Articles with similar content:

Health Risks of Electromagnetic Fields. Part I: Evaluation and Assessment of Electric and Magnetic Fields
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.31, 2003, issue 3
Lynn M. Brodsky, William Leiss, Riadh W. Y. Habash, Daniel Krewski, Michael Repacholi
Prosthetic Mammoplasty Sensitivity Syndrome: A Case for Causation
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.21, 2011, issue 3
S. V. M. Maharaj, S. A. Audino
Health Risks of Electromagnetic Fields. Part II: Evaluation and Assessment of Radio Frequency Radiation
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.31, 2003, issue 3
Lynn M. Brodsky, William Leiss, Riadh W. Y. Habash, Daniel Krewski, Michael Repacholi
Cardiovascular Pathologies Associated with Excessive Energy Drink Consumption: A Review
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.28, 2018, issue 2
Azhar Hussain, Prajna Barke, Suvra Biswas, Aravindakshan K. Jiji, Shams S. M. Tabrez
Effect of Prenatal Exposure to Pesticides on Children's Health
Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, Vol.35, 2016, issue 4
Lucyna Kapka-Skrzypczak, Marcin Kruszewski, Magdalena Matysiak, Barbara Jodlowska-Jedrych