Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.26 SNIP: 0.375 CiteScore™: 1.4

ISSN Imprimir: 0278-940X
ISSN En Línea: 1943-619X

Volumes:
Volumen 48, 2020 Volumen 47, 2019 Volumen 46, 2018 Volumen 45, 2017 Volumen 44, 2016 Volumen 43, 2015 Volumen 42, 2014 Volumen 41, 2013 Volumen 40, 2012 Volumen 39, 2011 Volumen 38, 2010 Volumen 37, 2009 Volumen 36, 2008 Volumen 35, 2007 Volumen 34, 2006 Volumen 33, 2005 Volumen 32, 2004 Volumen 31, 2003 Volumen 30, 2002 Volumen 29, 2001 Volumen 28, 2000 Volumen 27, 1999 Volumen 26, 1998 Volumen 25, 1997 Volumen 24, 1996 Volumen 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i2.20
pages 99-119

Motion Compensation Strategies in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Ruud B. van Heeswijk
Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland
Gabriele Bonanno
Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland
Simone Coppo
Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland
Andrew Coristine
Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland
Tobias Kober
Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare Sector IM&WS S, Lausanne, Switzerland
Matthias Stuber
Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland

SINOPSIS

Image quality in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considerably affected by motion. Therefore, motion is one of the most common sources of artifacts in contemporary cardiovascular MRI. Such artifacts in turn may easily lead to misinterpretations in the images and a subsequent loss in diagnostic quality. Hence, there is considerable research interest in strategies that help to overcome these limitations at minimal cost in time, spatial resolution, temporal resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio. This review summarizes and discusses the three principal sources of motion: the beating heart, the breathing lungs, and bulk patient movement. This is followed by a comprehensive overview of commonly used compensation strategies for these different types of motion. Finally, a summary and an outlook are provided.


Articles with similar content:

Considerations for Gradient Echo Echo Planar Imaging of Skeletal Muscle
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.46, 2018, issue 3
Andrew D. Davis
Monitoring Brain Oxygenation in Head-Injury Patients
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.37, 2009, issue 1-2
Justin Paul Phillips
Facilitating Earlier Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease through Point-of-Care Biosensors: A Review
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.46, 2018, issue 1
David Probst, Mackenzie M. Honikel, Jeffrey T. La Belle, Chi-En Lin
Computed Tomography Image Matching in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.44, 2016, issue 6
Surya P. Bhatt, Sandeep Bodduluri, Joseph M. Reinhardt
METHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING SHEAR INDUCED THROMBUS GROWTH
TSFP DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.9, 2015, issue
Josie Carberry, Kris Ryan, Isaac Pinar, Jane Arthur, Elizabeth Gardiner, Rob Andrews