Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer
Factor de Impacto: 1.406 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 1.075 SJR: 0.287 SNIP: 0.653 CiteScore™: 1.2

ISSN Imprimir: 1065-5131
ISSN En Línea: 1563-5074

Volumes:
Volumen 27, 2020 Volumen 26, 2019 Volumen 25, 2018 Volumen 24, 2017 Volumen 23, 2016 Volumen 22, 2015 Volumen 21, 2014 Volumen 20, 2013 Volumen 19, 2012 Volumen 18, 2011 Volumen 17, 2010 Volumen 16, 2009 Volumen 15, 2008 Volumen 14, 2007 Volumen 13, 2006 Volumen 12, 2005 Volumen 11, 2004 Volumen 10, 2003 Volumen 9, 2002 Volumen 8, 2001 Volumen 7, 2000 Volumen 6, 1999 Volumen 5, 1998 Volumen 4, 1997 Volumen 3, 1996 Volumen 2, 1995 Volumen 1, 1994

Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer

DOI: 10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.v11.i1.50
pages 61-74

Numerical Analyses of Effects of Tube Shape on Performance of a Finned Tube Heat Exchanger

Jingchun Min
2Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, No. 1, Qinghua Yuan, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
Ralph L. Webb
Department of Mechanical Engineering The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Specialist in enhanced heat transfer and heat exchanger design

SINOPSIS

This article discusses the effects of tube geometry on the performance of a multi-row finned tube heat exchanger having herringbone wavy fins. The air-side heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of the heat exchanger were predicted numerically and the tube-side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop were calculated using commonly adopted equations for turbulent flow in a smooth tube. The numerical calculations were performed in three dimensions for three frontal air velocities of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 m/s, yielding hydraulic diameter Reynolds numbers from 297 to 999. Investigated were five tube geometries, including a round tube, three elliptical oval tubes, and a flat oval tube. The round tube has a 15.875 mm (5/8") outside diameter and serves as the baseline tube. The four oval tubes were made by reforming the baseline round tube and have the same perimeter as that of the round tube. The aspect ratios of the three elliptical tubes are 2.00, 3.00, and 4.29, respectively, and the aspect ratio of the flat oval tube is 3.00. As the tube aspect ratio is increased, the air-side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop decrease, but the water-side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop increase. At 2.0 m/s frontal velocity, the 3.00 aspect ratio elliptical tube yields a 6.9% lower air-side heat transfer coefficient and a 45.9% lower air pressure drop than the round tube. As compared to the 3.00 aspect ratio elliptical tube, the same aspect ratio flat tube has a 0.6% higher air-side heat transfer coefficient and a 2.5% higher air pressure drop.


Articles with similar content:

Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Rectangular Fin and Elliptic Tube Heat Exchangers under Dry and Dehumidifying Conditions
Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, Vol.11, 2004, issue 1
Shin-Li Chen, Jiin-Yuh Jang
CONDENSATION PRESSURE DROP CHARACTERISTICS OF R410A INSIDE HORIZONTAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL ENHANCED TUBES
International Heat Transfer Conference 16, Vol.7, 2018, issue
Yan He, Zhi-chuan Sun, Wei Chen, Wei Li, Ruiheng Guo
Some Aspects of Plate Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers: With and Without Louvers
Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, Vol.6, 1999, issue 5
Chang-Tsair Chang, Yu-Juei Chang, Chi-Juan Lee, Chi-Chuan Wang
CONDENSATION HEAT TRANSFER AND PRESSURE DROP OF R-410A IN THREE 7.0MM OUTER DIAMETER MICROFIN TUBES HAVING DIFFERENT INSIDE GEOMETRIES
Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, Vol.20, 2013, issue 3
H. W. Byun, J. K. Lee, Nae-Hyun Kim
Effect of Hydraulic Diameter on Condensation of R-134A in Flat, Extruded Aluminum Tubes
Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, Vol.8, 2001, issue 2
Ralph L. Webb, Kemal Ermis