Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
Factor de Impacto: 4.911 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 3.179 SJR: 1.008 SNIP: 0.983 CiteScore™: 5.2

ISSN Imprimir: 2152-5080
ISSN En Línea: 2152-5099

Acceso abierto

International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification

DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2015012623
pages 569-583

ROBUSTNESS OF WILKS' CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Jan Peter Hessling
SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Measurement Technology, Box 857, SE-50115 Boras, Sweden
Jeffrey Uhlmann
University of Missouri−Columbia, Department of Computer Science, 201 EBW, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA

SINOPSIS

The striking generality and simplicity of Wilks' method has made it popular for quantifying modeling uncertainty. A conservative estimate of the confidence interval is obtained from a very limited set of randomly drawn model sample values, with probability set by the assigned so-called stability. In contrast, the reproducibility of the estimated limits, or robustness, is beyond our control as it is strongly dependent on the probability distribution of model results. The inherent combination of random sampling and faithful estimation in Wilks' approach is here shown to often result in poor robustness. The estimated confidence interval is consequently not a well-defined measure of modeling uncertainty. To remedy this deficiency, adjustments of Wilks' approach as well as alternative novel, effective but less known approaches based on deterministic sampling are suggested. For illustration, the robustness of Wilks' estimate for uniform and normal model distributions are compared.


Articles with similar content:

ADAPTIVE SAMPLING WITH TOPOLOGICAL SCORES
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.3, 2013, issue 2
Dan Maljovec, Valerio Pascucci, Bei Wang, Ana Kupresanin, Gardar Johannesson, Peer-Timo Bremer
EMBEDDED MODEL ERROR REPRESENTATION FOR BAYESIAN MODEL CALIBRATION
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.9, 2019, issue 4
Habib N. Najm, Xun Huan, Khachik Sargsyan
FORWARD AND INVERSE UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION USING MULTILEVEL MONTE CARLO ALGORITHMS FOR AN ELLIPTIC NONLOCAL EQUATION
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.6, 2016, issue 6
Ajay Jasra, Yan Zhou, Kody J.H. Law
AN EFFICIENT NUMERICAL METHOD FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN CARDIOLOGY MODELS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.9, 2019, issue 3
Zhiwen Zhang, Xindan Gao, Wenjun Ying
A GRADIENT-BASED SAMPLING APPROACH FOR DIMENSION REDUCTION OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH STOCHASTIC COEFFICIENTS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.5, 2015, issue 1
Miroslav Stoyanov, Clayton G. Webster