Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Atomization and Sprays
Factor de Impacto: 1.737 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Imprimir: 1044-5110
ISSN En Línea: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 30, 2020 Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2020032596
pages 763-782

IMPACT OF OPERATING CONDITIONS ON THE SPRAY IN A HIGH-SHEAR NOZZLE/SWIRLER INJECTOR INVESTIGATED USING HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATIONS

Xiaoyi Li
United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, Connecticut, 06108, USA

SINOPSIS

Understanding of the spray processes occurring in practical aeroengine fuel injection systems has been extremely limited, due to not only the multiphysics multiscale nature of the problem but also the complex injector geometries and the challenges in experimental measurements, especially under the high temperature-pressure combustor environment. Recent advances in numerical methods and increases in computational power have enabled the first-principles high-fidelity simulation of such processes to achieve a comprehensive physics-based understanding. In the past, we have conducted a detailed simulation of a high-shear nozzle/swirler injector at ambient conditions and validated the results against experimental measurements. Numerical algorithms to handle liquid evaporation at elevated temperature have been developed. In this work, we extend the same computational approach to study the impact of operating conditions on the spray physics in such a complex device. The previously validated ambient condition case was used as the baseline for comparison with other cases with higher temperature, pressure, and liquid fuel flow rate. The high-fuel-loading cases are compared with low-fuel-loading ones to help with understanding the impact of filming on injector performance. The spray details regarding jet trajectory, atomization degree, film thickness, and jet-to-film volume flux ratio were analyzed under ambient as well as elevated conditions. It was observed that a high temperature/pressure condition significantly modifies the near-field liquid spray inside the swirler. The condition-induced changes also depend on the dominant liquid atomization mechanisms (jet-in-swirling-flow atomization or film-edge breakup).

REFERENCIAS

  1. Almgren, A.S., Bell, J.B., Colella, P., and Marthaler, T., A Cartesian Grid Projection Method for the Incom-pressible Euler Equations in Complex Geometries, SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1289-1309, 1997.

  2. Almgren, A.S., Bell, J.B., Colella, P., Howell, L.H., and Welcome, M., A Conservative Adaptive Projection Method for the Variable Density Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 142, pp. 1-46, 1998.

  3. Arienti, M., Wang, L., Corn, M., Li, X., Soteriou, M.C., Shedd, T.A., and Herrmann, M., Modeling Wall Film Formation and Breakup Using an Integrated Interface-Tracking/Discrete-Phase Approach, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 1059-1068, 2011.

  4. Arienti, M., Li, X., Soteriou, M.C., Eckett, C.A., Sussman, M., and Jensen, R.J., Coupled Level-Set/Volume-of-Fluid Method for Simulation of Injector Atomization, J. Propul. Power, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 147-157,2013.

  5. Bai, C.X. and Gosman, A.D., Development of Methodology for Spray Impingement Simulation, SAE Paper no. 950283, 1995.

  6. Becker, J. and Hassa, C., Breakup and Atomization of a Kerosene Jet in Crossflow at Elevated Pressure, Atomization Sprays, vol. 11, pp. 49-67, 2002.

  7. Cohen, J.M. and Rosfjord, T.J., Influences on the Sprays Formed by High-Shear Fuel Nozzle Swirler Assemblies, J. Propul. Power, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 16-27, 1993.

  8. Desjardins, O. and Pitsch, H., Detailed Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Atomization of Liquid Jets, Atomization Sprays, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 311-336,2010.

  9. Herrmann, M., Detailed Numerical Simulations of the Primary Atomization of a Turbulent Liquid Jet in Crossflow, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 132, no. 6, p. 061506,2010a.

  10. Herrmann, M., A Parallel Eulerian Interface Tracking/Lagrangian Point Particle Multi-Scale Coupling Procedure, J. Comput. Phys, vol. 229, no. 3, pp. 745-759, 2010b.

  11. Incropera, F.P., Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.

  12. Kastengren, A.L., Powell, C.F., Wang, Y., Im, K.-S., and Wang, J., X-Ray Radiography Measurements of Diesel Spray Structure at Engine-Like Ambient Density, Atomization Sprays, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1031-1044,2009.

  13. Li, X. and Soteriou, M.C., High-Fidelity Simulation of Fuel Atomization in a Realistic Swirling Flow Injector, Atomization Sprays, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1049-1078,2013.

  14. Li, X. and Soteriou, M.C., High-Fidelity Simulation of High Density-Ratio Liquid Jet Atomization in Crossflow with Experimental Validation, ILASS Americas 26th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Portland, OR, 2014.

  15. Li, X. and Soteriou, M.C., High-Fidelity Simulation of Liquid Fuel Atomization with Interface Evaporation, ILASS Americas 27th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Raleigh, NC, 2015.

  16. Li, X. and Soteriou, M.C., High Fidelity Simulation and Analysis of Liquid Jet Atomization in a Gaseous Crossflow at Intermediate Weber Numbers, Phys. Fluids, vol. 28, p. 082101, 2016.

  17. Li, X. and Soteriou, M.C., Detailed Numerical Simulation of Liquid Jet Atomization in Crossflow of Increasing Density, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 104, pp. 214-232, 2018.

  18. Li, X., Arienti, M., Soteriou, M.C., and Sussman, M.M., Towards an Efficient, High-Fidelity Methodology for Liquid Jet Atomization Computations, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, p. 092407, 2010.

  19. Li, X., Soteriou, M., Arienti, M., and Sussman, M., High-Fidelity Simulation of Atomization and Evaporation in a Liquid Jet in Cross-Flow, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, p. 2011-99,2012.

  20. Li, X., Soteriou, M.C., Kim, W., and Cohen, J.M., High Fidelity Simulation of the Spray Generated by a Realistic Swirling Flow Injector, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 136, p. 071503, 2013.

  21. Li, X., Gao, H., and Soteriou, M.C., Investigation of the Impact of High Liquid Viscosity on Jet Atomization in Crossflow via High-Fidelity Simulations, Phys. Fluids, vol. 29, p. 082103,2017.

  22. Madabhushi, R.K., A Model for Numerical Simulation of Breakup of a Liquid Jet in Crossflow, Atomization Sprays, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 413-424, 2003.

  23. Mazallon, J., Dai, Z., and Faeth, G.M., Primary Breakup of Nonturbulent Round Liquid Jets in Gas Cross-flows, Atomization Sprays, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 291-311, 1999.

  24. O'Rourke, P. J. and Amsden, A.A., The TAB Method for Numerical Calculation of Spray Droplet Breakup, SAE Technical Paper no. 872089, 1987.

  25. O'Rourke, P.J. and Bracco, F.V., Modeling Drop Interactions in Thick Sprays and a Comparison with Experiments, Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 101-116, 1980.

  26. Park, J.H., Yoon, Y., and Hwang, S.S., Improved TAB Model for Prediction of Spray Droplet Deformation and Breakup, Atomization Sprays, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 387-401, 2002.

  27. Reitz, R.D., Modeling Atomization Processes in High-Pressure Vaporizing Sprays, Atomization Sprays Technol., vol. 3, pp. 309-337, 1987.

  28. Reitz, R.D. and Bracco, F.V., Mechanism of Atomization of a Liquid Jet, Phys. Fluids, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1730-1742, 1982.

  29. Sallam, K.A., Aalburg, C., andFaeth, G.M., Breakup of Round Nonturbulent Liquid Jets in Gaseous Cross-flow, AIAA J, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2529-2540, 2004.

  30. Schetz, J.A. and Paddye, A., Penetration of a Liquid Jet in Subsonic Airstreams, AIAA J., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1385-1390, 1997.

  31. Shedd, T.A., Corn, M.L., Cohen, J.M., Arienti, M., and Soteriou, M.C., Liquid Film Formation by an Impinging Jet in a High-Velocity Air Stream, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, p. 092407, 2010.

  32. Shinjo, J. andUmemura, A., Simulation of Liquid Jet Primary Breakup: Dynamics ofLigament and Droplet Formation, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 513-532, 2010.

  33. Sussman, M., A Second Order Coupled Level Set and Volume-of-Fluid Method for Computing Growth and Collapse of Vapor Bubbles, J. Comput. Phys, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 110-136, 2003.

  34. Sussman, M. and Dommermuth, D., The Numerical Simulation of Ship Waves Using Cartesian Grid Methods, Proc. of the Twenty-Fifth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, St. Johns, New Foundland and Labrador, Canada, 2004.

  35. Sussman, M., Almgren, A.S., Bell, J.B., Colella, P., Howell, L.H., and Welcome, M.L., An Adaptive Level Set Approach for Incompressible Two-Phase Flows, J. Comput. Phys, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 81-124,1999.

  36. Sussman, M., Smith, K.M., Hussaini, M.Y., Ohta, M., and Zhi-Wei, R., A Sharp Interface Method for Incompressible Two-Phase Flows, J. Comput. Phys, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 469-505, 2007a.

  37. Sussman, M., Smith, K.M., Hussaini, M.Y., Ohta, M., and Zhi-Wei, R., A Sharp Interface Method for Incompressible Two-Phase Flows, J. Comput. Phys, vol. 221, pp. 469-505, 2007b.

  38. Wu, P.K., Kirkendall, K.A., Fuller, R.P., and Nejad, A.S., Breakup Processes of Liquid Jets in Subsonic Crossflows, J. Propul. Power, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 64-73, 1997.

  39. Wu, P.K., Tseng, L.K., and Faeth, G.M., Primary Breakup in Gas/Liquid Mixing Layers for Turbulent Liquids, Atomization Sprays, vol. 2, pp. 295-317, 1992.

  40. Yaws, C.L., Chemical Properties Handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999.

  41. Yue, Y., Powell, C.F., Poola, R., Wang, J.-C., and Schaller, J.K., Quantitative Measurements of Diesel Fuel Spray Characteristics in the Near-Nozzle Region using X-Ray Absoption, Atomization Sprays, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 471-490, 2001.


Articles with similar content:

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS IN A PRESSURE-SWIRL NOZZLE
International Heat Transfer Conference 16, Vol.18, 2018, issue
Tao Zhang, Rui Jiang, Bo Dong, Weizhong Li
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO INVESTIGATING LIQUEFIED LPG SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.20, 2010, issue 6
Kwan-Soo Lee, Ki-Hyung Lee, Ki-Bum Kim, Yung-Jin Kim
HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATION OF FUEL ATOMIZATION IN A REALISTIC SWIRLING FLOW INJECTOR
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.23, 2013, issue 11
Marios Soteriou, Xiaoyi Li
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON NEAR-FIELD BREAKUP CHARACTERISTICS OF HYBRID-MIXED TWIN-FLUID ATOMIZER
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.28, 2018, issue 10
T. Y. Li, Shiyan Li, X. Y. Yang, Yi Gao, C. Fu
EFFECT OF FUEL PROPERTIES ON SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS OF ALTERNATIVE JET FUELS USING GLOBAL SIZING VELOCIMETRY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.24, 2014, issue 7
Kumaran Kannaiyan, Reza Sadr