Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Atomization and Sprays
Factor de Impacto: 1.737 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Imprimir: 1044-5110
ISSN En Línea: 1936-2684

Volumen 30, 2020 Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2020030618
pages 841-859


Sumit Joshi
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
T. N. C. Anand
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India


Studying the deformation and breakup behavior of molten metal droplets is crucial in the context of their atomization to form metal powders. During secondary breakup, droplets deform and then break up. The initial deformation plays an important role in the breakup phenomenon, as it is the first stage that the droplet goes through during its breakup. In this work, secondary breakup experiments were performed at low Weber numbers where the bag breakup mode is predominant, and deformation characteristics of the droplet were measured. Since studies on molten metals are scarce, the test liquids included high-surface-tension liquids (molten tin and gallium), as well as water and ethanol, to obtain a wide range of surface tension values (0.71-0.022 N/m). The objectives were to investigate deformation and breakup behavior of molten metals compared to waterlike liquids, to examine the range of Weber numbers corresponding to the bag breakup mode, and to check the applicability of the standard Taylor analogy breakup (TAB) model to molten metal atomization. The experimental results show that the deformation and breakup characteristics of molten metal droplets are different from classical waterlike liquids; the extent of deformation and the deformation rate are low for molten metals. To take this into account, a correlation relating the maximum cross-stream length to the initial droplet diameter is proposed. A semianalytical model which predicts the deformation of the droplet is also presented. The results from this model agree well with our experimental results and the literature. The model also performs better than the TAB model for most of the conditions studied.


  1. Alchagirov, B.B. and Mozgovoi, A.G., The Surface Tension of Molten Gallium at High Temperatures, High Temp., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 791-792,2005.

  2. Assael, M.J., Kalyva, A.E., Antoniadis, K.D., Michael Banish, R., Egry, I., Wu, J., Kaschnitz, E., and Wakeham, W.A., Reference Data for the Density and Viscosity of Liquid Copper and Liquid Tin, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1-8,2010.

  3. Assael, M.J., Armyra, I.J., Brillo, J., Stankus, S.V., Wu, J., and Wakeham, W.A., Reference Data for the Density and Viscosity of Liquid Cadmium, Cobalt, Gallium, Indium, Mercury, Silicon, Thallium, and Zinc, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1-16,2012.

  4. Cao, X.K., Sun, Z.G., Li, W.F., Liu, H.F., and Yu, Z.H., A New Breakup Regime of Liquid Drops Identified in a Continuous and Uniform Air Jet Flow, Phys. Fluids, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1-7,2007.

  5. Chou, W.H. and Faeth, G., Temporal Properties of Secondary Drop Breakup in the Bag Breakup Regime, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 889-912,1998.

  6. Clark, M.M., Drop Breakup in a Turbulent Flow-I. Conceptual and Modeling Considerations, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 671-679,1988.

  7. Dai, Z. and Faeth, G.M., Temporal Properties of Secondary Drop Breakup in the Multimode Breakup Regime, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 217-236,2001.

  8. Flock, A.K., Guildenbecher, D.R., Chen, J., Sojka, P.E., and Bauer, H.J., Experimental Statistics of Droplet Trajectory and Air Flow during Aerodynamic Fragmentation of Liquid Drops, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 47, pp. 37-49,2012.

  9. Gancarz, T., Moser, Z., Gasior, W., Pstrus, J., and Henein, H., A Comparison of Surface Tension, Viscosity, and Density of Sn and Sn-Ag Alloys Using Different Measurement Techniques, Int. J. Thermophys., vol. 32, pp. 1210-1233,2011.

  10. Goghari, A.A., Producing Small Droplets of Aqueous Solutions and Molten Metals Using a Pneumatic Droplet Generator, PhD, University of Toronto, 2010.

  11. Grandchamp, X., Fujiso, Y., Wu, B., and Van Hirtum, A., Steady Laminar Axisymmetrical Nozzle Flow at Moderate Reynolds Numbers: Modeling and Experiment, ASME J. Fluids Eng., vol. 134, pp. 1-13, 2012.

  12. Guildenbecher, D.R., Lopez-Rivera, C., and Sojka, P.E., Secondary Atomization, Exp. Fluids, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 371-402,2009.

  13. Hanson, A.R., Domich, E.G., and Adams, H.S., Shock Tube Investigation of the Breakup of Drops by Air Blasts, Phys. Fluids, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 1070,1963.

  14. Hsiang, L.P. and Faeth, G., Near-Limit Drop Deformation and Secondary Breakup, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 635-652,1992.

  15. Hsiang, L.P. and Faeth, G.M., Drop Deformation and Breakup due to Shock Wave and Steady Disturbances, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 545-560,1995.

  16. Hwang, S.S., Liu, Z., and Reitz, R.D., Breakup Mechanisms and Drag Coefficients of High-Speed Vapor-izing Liquid Drops, Atomization Sprays, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 353-376,1996.

  17. Ibrahim, E.A., Yang, H.Q., and Przekwas, A.J., Modeling of Spray Droplets Deformation and Breakup, J. Propuls. Power, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 651-654,1993.

  18. Joshi, S. and Anand, T.N.C., Studies on Secondary Atomization of Molten Gallium Droplets at Nearly Critical Weber Numbers, ILASS-Asia 2016, Chennai, India, 2016.

  19. Joshi, S., Ranade, S., and Anand, T.N.C., Breakup of a Surfactant-Laden Drop in a Continuous Air Jet Stream, ILASS-Europe 2019, Paris, France, p. 10,2019.

  20. Kim, S., Hwang, J.W., and Lee, C.S., Experiments and Modeling on Droplet Motion and Atomization of Diesel and Bio-Diesel Fuels in a Cross-Flowed Air Stream, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 667-679,2010.

  21. Krzeczkowski, S.A., Measurement of Liquid Droplet Mechanism, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 6, no. 1958, pp. 227-239,1980.

  22. Kulkarni, V. and Sojka, P.E., Bag Breakup of Low Viscosity Drops in the Presence of a Continuous Air Jet, Phys. Fluids, vol. 26, no. 7, p. 072103,2014.

  23. Lee, C.H. and Reitz, R.D., An Experimental Study of the Effect of Gas Density on the Distortion and Breakup Mechanism of Drops in High Speed Gas Stream, Int. J Multiphase Flow, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 229-244,2000.

  24. Lee, M.W., Park, J.J., Farid, M.M., and Yoon, S.S., Comparison and Correction of the Drop Breakup Models for Stochastic Dilute Spray Flow, Appl. Math. Model., vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 4512-4520,2012.

  25. Liu, A.B., Mather, D., and Reitz, R.D., Modeling the Effects of Drop Drag and Breakup on Fuel Sprays, SAE Tech. Paper, 1993.

  26. Liu, Z. and Reitz, R., An Analysis of the Distortion and Breakup Mechanisms of High Speed Liquid Drops, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 631-650,1997.

  27. Mates, S.P. and Settles, G.S., A Study of Liquid Metal Atomization Using Close-Coupled Nozzles, Part 1: Gas Dynamic Behavior, Atomization Sprays, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19-40,2005a.

  28. Mates, S.P. and Settles, G.S., A Study of Liquid Metal Atomization Using Close-Coupled Nozzles, Part 2: Atomization Behavior, Atomization Sprays, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41-60,2005b.

  29. Nicholls, J.A. and Ranger, A.A., Aerodynamic Shattering of Liquid Drops, AIAA J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 285-290,1969.

  30. Opfer, L., Roisman, I.V., and Tropea, C., Aerodynamic Fragmentation of Drops: Dynamics of the Liquid Bag, ICLASS 2012, Heidelberg, Germany, 2012.

  31. Opfer, L., Roisman, I.V., Venzmer, J., Klostermann, M., and Tropea, C., Droplet-Air Collision Dynamics: Evolution of the Film Thickness, Phys. Rev. E - Stat., Nonlin., Soft Matter Phys., vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2014.

  32. O'Rourke, P. and Amsden, A., The TAB Method for Numerical Calculation of Spray Droplet Breakup, SAE Tech. Paper 872089,1987.

  33. Park, J.H., Yoon, Y., and Hwang, S.S., Improved TAB Model for Prediction of Spray Droplet Deformation and Breakup, Atomization Sprays, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 387-401,2002.

  34. Pereira, J.D., Wind Tunnels Aerodynamics, Models and Experiments, New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2011.

  35. Pilch, M. andErdman, C.A.,Use of Breakup Time Data and Velocity History Data to Predict the Maximum Size of Stable Fragments for Acceleration-Induced Breakup of a Liquid Drop, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 741-757,1987.

  36. Reitz, R.D. and Lee, C.S., Effect of Liquid Properties on the Breakup Mechanism of High-Speed Liquid Drops, Atomization Sprays, vol. 11, no. 1,pp. 1-19,2001.

  37. Rohatgi, A., WebPlotDigitizer, 2018.

  38. Sarkar, S., Sivaprasad, P.V., and Bakshi, S., Numerical Modeling and Prediction of Particle Size Distribution during Gas Atomization of Molten Tin, Atomization Sprays, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 23-51,2016.

  39. Sarkar, S., Prashanth, W.S., Anand, T.N.C., Sivaprasad, P. V., and Bakshi, S., Study of Primary Breakup of Molten Tin during Powder Production in Free-Fall Configuration, Atomization Sprays, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 269-284,2017.

  40. Sichani, A.B. and Emami, M.D., A Droplet Deformation and Breakup Model based on Virtual Work Prin-ciple, Phys. Fluids, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 032103,2015.

  41. Strotos, G., Malgarinos, I., Nikolopoulos, N., and Gavaises, M., Predicting Droplet Deformation and Breakup for Moderate Weber Numbers, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 85, pp. 96-109,2016.

  42. Strotos, G., Malgarinos, I., Nikolopoulos, N., Gavaises, M., Nikas, K.S., and Moustris, K., Determination of the Aerodynamic Droplet Breakup Boundaries based on a Total Force Approach, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 69, pp. 164-173,2018.

  43. Theofanous, T.G., Li, G.J., and Dinh, T.N., Aerobreakup in Rarefied Supersonic Gas Flows, J. Fluids Eng., vol. 126, no. 4, p. 516,2004.

  44. Villermaux, E. and Bossa, B., Single-Drop Fragmentation Determines Size Distribution of Raindrops, Nat. Phys., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 697-702,2009.

  45. Wang, C., Chang, S., Wu, H., and Xu, J., Modeling of Drop Breakup in the Bag Breakup Regime, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol. 104, no. 15, p. 154107,2014.

  46. Whitelaw, D.S., Whitelaw, J.H., and Arcoumanis, C., Breakup of Droplets of Newtonian and Non- Newtonian Fluids, Atomization Sprays, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 245-256,1996.

  47. Zhao, H., Liu, H.F., Li, W.F., and Xu, J.L., Morphological Classification of Low Viscosity Drop Bag Breakup in a Continuous Air Jet Stream, Phys. Fluids, vol. 22, no. 11, p. 114103,2010.

  48. Zhao, H., Liu, H.F., Xu, J.L., Li, W.F., and Lin, K.F., Temporal Properties of Secondary Drop Breakup in the Bag-Stamen Breakup Regime, Phys. Fluids, vol. 25, no. 5, p. 054102,2013.

Articles with similar content:

Atomization and Sprays, Vol.26, 2016, issue 1
Shamit Bakshi, P. V. Sivaprasad, Supriya Sarkar
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.24, 2014, issue 8
Anthony Altieri, Steven Cryer, Lipi Acharya
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.27, 2017, issue 3
Shamit Bakshi, T. N. C. Anand, P. V. Sivaprasad, Supriya Sarkar, W. S. Prashanth
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.22, 2012, issue 7
Sadegh Dabiri, Faryar Jabbari, Mina Rohani, Derek Dunn-Rankin
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.30, 2020, issue 4
Ghobad Amini