Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research
ESCI SJR: 0.206 SNIP: 0.446 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Imprimir: 2152-5102
ISSN En Línea: 2152-5110

Volumen 47, 2020 Volumen 46, 2019 Volumen 45, 2018 Volumen 44, 2017 Volumen 43, 2016 Volumen 42, 2015 Volumen 41, 2014 Volumen 40, 2013 Volumen 39, 2012 Volumen 38, 2011 Volumen 37, 2010 Volumen 36, 2009 Volumen 35, 2008 Volumen 34, 2007 Volumen 33, 2006 Volumen 32, 2005 Volumen 31, 2004 Volumen 30, 2003 Volumen 29, 2002 Volumen 28, 2001 Volumen 27, 2000 Volumen 26, 1999 Volumen 25, 1998 Volumen 24, 1997 Volumen 23, 1996 Volumen 22, 1995

International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research

DOI: 10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.v24.i1-3.30
pages 24-33

2 MW Diesel Fuel Oil & Water Spray Characteristics − a Comparison

Colin J. Bates
Cardiff School of Engineering Cardiff University, PO Box 685 Cardiff CF24 3TA, UK
A. J. Jolly
Cardiff School of Engineering, Wales, U.K.


Spray atomization characteristics are presented for an industrial diesel fuel oil and a 2 MW, 60° pressure-swirl atomizer, operating over a pressure range from 7 to 15 bar. These characteristics are compared with results achieved using the same nozzle with water as the atomized fluid. The results achieved for the fuel oil have been based upon a phase Doppler anemometry (PDA) investigation during which three scattered light collection angles (68°, 150° and 110°) were employed, with 110° scattering perpendicular polarized laser light was used, whereas parallel polarization was employed for the other two scattering angles. Significant variations in both the individual droplet histograms and the Sauter mean diameters have been observed.
For this presentation the comparison will be based on the use of the same two-dimensional PDA transmission optical geometry and a 4 W argon-ion laser. The scattering angle of 68° represents the Brewster angle for the fuel oil. This presentation therefore provides a detailed comparison between the results achieved using the Brewster angle (72°) for water and demonstrates the influence of liquid viscosity, surface tension and density upon the spray field characteristics.
The structure of the fuel spray was such that the measurements could only be achieved over the region close to the nozzle, so the comparison is restricted accordingly. The measured variation of Sauter mean diameter (D32) is also compared with the results achieved from the empirical correlations of Radcliffe [5] and Jasuja [6] for both fluids considered.