Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology

ISSN Imprimir: 0892-0915
ISSN En Línea: 2375-0014

Archives: Volume 10, 1996 to Volume 20, 2008

Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevNeurobiol.v10.i3-4.30
pages 317-356

The Frontal Cortex-Basal Ganglia System in Primates

Steven P. Wise
Laboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH Animal Center, Elmer School Road, Bldg. 110, Room 119, Poolesville, MD 20837
Elisabeth A. Murray
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bldg. 49, Room 1B80, Bethesda, MD 20892
Charles R. Gerfen
Laboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH Animal Center, Elmer School Road, Bldg. 110, Room 119, Poolesville, MD 20837


The primate basal ganglia receives information from most of the cerebrum, including the frontal cortex, but projects (via the dorsal thalamus) primarily to the frontal lobe, perhaps in its entirety. As such, the frontal cortex and basal ganglia constitute an integrated, distributed neuronal architecture. We review evidence that the frontal lobe and basal ganglia specialize in different, but related, aspects of response learning. Frontal cortex acts when new rules need to be learned and older ones rejected, whereas the basal ganglia potentiate previously learned rules based on environmental context and reinforcement history. Such potentiation increases the probability that the central nervous system will select a particular rule to guide behavior.
We outline a possible mechanism for the basal ganglia's proposed role in rule potentiation, one that involves both the direct and indirect striatal output pathways and their dopaminergic input. It has previously been proposed that direct-pathway neurons recognize a pattern of corticostriatal inputs, which promotes activity in recurrent, positive-feedback modules (or loops) of which they are an integral part. We propose that this recurrent activity potentiates a rule associated with those modules. If so, then the dopaminergic system is well situated and organized to modulate rule potentiation in both the short and long term. Dopaminergic neurons of the midbrain increase activity during learning and other periods of relatively unpredictable reinforcement. Dopamine enhances gene expression and other forms of activity in striatal neurons of the direct pathway, while suppressing neurons of the indirect pathway. In the short term, then, dopamine may augment the activity of modules triggered by a recognized context, whereas in the long term it may promote context-dependent activation of the same modules. Together, these modulatory influences could support both rule potentiation and learning the context for potentiating that rule.

Articles with similar content:

The Primate Substantia Nigra and VTA: Integrative Circuitry and Function
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology, Vol.11, 1997, issue 4
Julie L. Fudge, Suzanne N. Haber
On the Relationships Between the Striatum and the Pedunculopontine Tegmental Nucleus
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology, Vol.11, 1997, issue 4
Philip Winn, Verity J. Brown, Wendy L. Inglis
Cortical Mechanisms of Cocaine Sensitization
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology, Vol.17, 2005, issue 2
Jeffery D. Steketee
Neuronal Circuit Regulation of the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Stress Axis
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology, Vol.10, 1996, issue 3-4
William E. Cullinan, Chantai M.-F. Prewitt, James P. Herman
Oscillatory Circuits Underlying Locomotor Networks in the Rat Spinal Cord
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology, Vol.18, 2006, issue 1-2
Andrea Nistri, Giuliano Taccola