Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Publication de 6  numéros par an

ISSN Imprimer: 1072-8325

ISSN En ligne: 1940-431X

SJR: 0.514 SNIP: 0.875 CiteScore™:: 2.4 H-Index: 27

Indexed in

METRICS FIRST, DIVERSITY LATER? MAKING THE SHORT LIST AND GETTING ADMITTED TO PHYSICS PhD PROGRAMS

Volume 25, Numéro 4, 2019, pp. 283-306
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2019027863
Get accessGet access

RÉSUMÉ

Recent research suggests that faculty reliance on graduate record examination (GRE) scores early in the graduate admissions review disproportionately limits access to doctoral education for women, Black, Latinx, and Native American students. However, some faculty do engage in more holistic review−and in so doing, weigh diversity−when evaluating applicants on a short list. This paper has three objectives: to test the prevalence of this two-stage review process; to examine whether the factors associated with an applicant's selection to a short list differ from those associated with receiving an admission offer; and third, to assess implications of admissions preferences for equitable access. We conducted fixed-effects logistic regression using application-level data from six large, selective physics programs who participated in a project piloting means to increase diversity in physics. We found that faculty in these programs indeed placed a premium on standard evaluation metrics in the first round of review. Women are more likely than men to both make the short list and be admitted, whereas Black and Latinx applicants do not have significantly higher odds than white students of moving forward in the admissions process, all else equal. Our findings add weight to a rising tide of evidence that faculty must revisit the narrow framing they have traditionally used in the admissions process to increase diversity in their graduate programs.

RÉFÉRENCES
  1. Attiyeh, G., & Attiyeh, R. (1997). Testing for bias in graduate school admissions. The Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 524-548. .

  2. Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1069-1090. .

  3. Blue, J., Traxler, A., & Cid, X. (2018). Gender matters. Physics Today, 71(3), 40-46. .

  4. Cochran, G., Hodapp, T., & Brown, E. (2017). Identifying barriers to ethnic/racial minority students' participation in graduate physics. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2017, Cincinnati, OH. Accessed March 17, 2019, from https://www.compadre.org/per/items/detail. cfm?ID=14576 .

  5. Cureton, E. E., Cureton, L. W., & Bishop, R. (1949). Prediction of success in graduate study of psychology at the University of Tennessee. American Psychologist, 4(8), 361-362. .

  6. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press. .

  7. Ehrlich, R. (2007). Where are the female physicists? CSWP Gazette: The Newsletter of the Committee on the Status of Women in Physics of the American Physical Society, 26(2), 3-5. .

  8. Georgi, H. (2000). Views from an affirmative activist. STATUS, 4-13. Glanz, J. (1996). How not to pick a physicist? Science, 274(5288), 710-712. .

  9. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. .

  10. Grodsky, E. (2007). Compensatory sponsorship in higher education. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1662-1712. .

  11. Johnson, A., Ong, M., Ko, L. T., Smith, J., & Hodari, A. (2017). Common challenges faced by women of color in physics, and actions faculty can take to minimize those challenges. Physics Teacher, 55(6), 356-360. .

  12. Jones, D. (2010). Psychology: A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists' studies. Science, 328, 1627. .

  13. Kent, J. D., & McCarthy, M. T. (2016). Holistic review in graduate admissions: A report from the Council of Graduate Schools. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools. .

  14. Kumar, A., & Lim, S. S. (2008). How do decision frames influence the stock investment choices of individual investors? Management Science, 54(6), 1052-1064. .

  15. Kuncel, N. R., Wee, S., Serafin, L., & Hezlett, S. A. (2010). The validity of the graduate record examination for master's and doctoral programs: A meta-analytic investigation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 340-352. .

  16. Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262-265. .

  17. Marston, A. R. (1971). It is time to reconsider the graduate record examination. American Psychologist, 26(7), 653-655. .

  18. Lynch, S. J. (2000). Equity and science education reform. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. .

  19. Miller, C. W. (2013). Admissions criteria and diversity in graduate school. APS News, 22(2), 8. .

  20. Miller, C. W., Zwickl, B. M., Posselt, J. R., Silvestrini, R. T., and Hodapp, T. (2019). Typical physics PhD admissions criteria limit access to underrepresented groups but fail to predict doctoral completion. Science Advances, 5(1), 1-8. .

  21. Miller, C., & Stassun, K. (2014). A test that fails. Nature, 510(7504), 303-304. .

  22. Popejoy, A. B., & Fullerton, S. M. (2016). Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature News, 538(7624), 161. .

  23. Posselt, J. R. (2014). Toward inclusive excellence in graduate education: Constructing merit and diversity in PhD admissions. American Journal of Education, 120(4), 481-514. .

  24. Posselt, J. R. (2015). Disciplinary logics in doctoral admissions: Understanding patterns of faculty evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 807-833. .

  25. Posselt, J. R. (2016). Inside graduate admissions: Merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. .

  26. Potvin, G., Chari, D., & Hodapp, T. (2017). Investigating approaches to diversity in a national survey of physics doctoral degree programs: The graduate admissions landscape. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020142. .

  27. Prescod-Weinstein, C. (2017). Curiosity and the end of discrimination. Nature Astronomy, 1, 0145. .

  28. Ripin, B. H. (1996). Fighting the gender gap: Standardized tests are poor indicators of ability in physics. American Physical Society News, 5(7). .

  29. Rodriguez, I., Brewe, E., Sawtelle, V., & Kramer, L. H. (2012). Impact of equity models and statistical measures on interpretations of educational reform. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020103. .

  30. Rosa, K., & Mensah, F. M. (2016). Educational pathways of Black women physicists: Stories of experiencing and overcoming obstacles in life. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020113. .

  31. Scherr, R. E., Plisch, M., Gray, K. E., Potvin, G., & Hodapp, T. (2017). Fixed and growth mindsets in physics graduate admissions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020133. .

  32. Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Does the graduate record examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists? A case study. American Psychologist, 52(6), 630-641. .

  33. Stevens, M. L. (2009). Creating a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press. .

  34. Teranishi, R. T. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and higher education policy: The use of critical quantitative research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 37-49. .

  35. Tuttle, S. (2017). Astronomical community: The power of being counted. Nature Astronomy, 1(6), 0154. .

  36. US Census Bureau. (2016). American community survey 1-year estimates. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. .

CITÉ PAR
  1. Posselt Julie, Hernandez Theresa E., Villarreal Cynthia D., Rodgers Aireale J., Irwin Lauren N., Evaluation and Decision Making in Higher Education, in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 35, 2020. Crossref

  2. Posselt Julie, Hernandez Theresa E., Villarreal Cynthia D., Rodgers Aireale J., Irwin Lauren N., Evaluation and Decision Making in Higher Education, in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 35, 2020. Crossref

  3. Verostek Mike, Miller Casey W., Zwickl Benjamin, Analyzing admissions metrics as predictors of graduate GPA and whether graduate GPA mediates Ph.D. completion, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, 2, 2021. Crossref

  4. Roberts Sonia F., Pyfrom Elana, Hoffman Jacob A., Pai Christopher, Reagan Erin K., Light Alysson E., Review of Racially Equitable Admissions Practices in STEM Doctoral Programs, Education Sciences, 11, 6, 2021. Crossref

  5. Mikkelsen Nils J., Young Nicholas T., Caballero Marcos D., Investigating institutional influence on graduate program admissions by modeling physics Graduate Record Examination cutoff scores, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, 1, 2021. Crossref

  6. Rosa Katemari, Blue Jennifer, Hyater-Adams Simone, Cochran Geraldine L., Prescod-Weinstein Chanda, Resource Letter RP-1: Race and physics, American Journal of Physics, 89, 8, 2021. Crossref

  7. Young Nicholas T., Caballero Marcos D., Physics Graduate Record Exam does not help applicants “stand out”, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, 1, 2021. Crossref

  8. Rukmini Elisabeth, Emenike Mary E., Angelina Hanna, Mentorship Using DEIR Principles: A Case in Developing Chemistry-Related Student Research, Journal of Chemical Education, 99, 1, 2022. Crossref

  9. Malespina Alysa, Singh Chandralekha, Gender differences in grades versus grade penalties: Are grade anomalies more detrimental for female physics majors?, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 2, 2022. Crossref

  10. Young Nicholas T., Tollefson K., Zegers Remco G. T., Caballero Marcos D., Rubric-based holistic review: A promising route to equitable graduate admissions in physics, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 2, 2022. Crossref

Prochains articles

Mitigating Barriers, Scaffolding Success: Institutional Supports for Black Undergraduate Women in Engineering Programs Meseret Hailu, Neelakshi Rajeev Tewari, Brooke Coley Underrepresented Students Pursuing Mathematics-Intensive Degrees: Changes after Transitioning to College Alison Marzocchi What do STEM Clubs do? The Effect of College Club Participation on Career Confidence and Gender Inclusion Guillermo Dominguez Garcia, Jennifer Glass Validating Practices and Messages that Promote Women’s Engineering Classroom Belongingness: An Intersectional Approach Dina Verdin, A Lili Castillo Examining the Role of Institutional Support on International Doctoral Women’s STEM Persistence and Mental Health Aisha Farra, Aashika Anantharaman, Sarah Swanson, Kerrie Wilkins-Yel, Jennifer Bekki, Nedim Yel, Ashley Randall, Bianca Bernstein Searching for safe space: Student veterans’ uneven pathways to STEM careers by race Brittany Hunt, Jae Hoon Lim Does Race, Ethnicity or Gender of the Mentor Affect Whether They Will be a “Good Mentor”? A Qualitative Analysis of Students’ Perceptions Reuben May, Christine Stanley, America Soto-Arzat, Jennifer Ackerman PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND TEAM MEMBER EFFECTIVENESS OF MINORITIZED STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Behzad Beigpourian, Matthew Ohland Perceptions of Department Chair Roles and Responsibilities in Career Progression and Success of Women STEM Faculty Stephanie Jones, Patricia Ryan Pal “Barbed-Wire Boundaries”: Hidden Curriculum, First-Generation and Low-Income Engineering Students, and Internship Acquisition Jerry Yang, Joseph Towles, Sheri Sheppard, Sara Atwood “I Want to Make an Impact”: The Science Identity and Career Goals of Black and Latinx Science and Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars Sylvia Mendez, Kathryn Watson, Kathryn Starkey, Valerie Conley Care Work, Science Brokering, and Career Motivations: How Hispanic/Latinx Young Adults in STEM Express Social Agency during the COVID-19 Pandemic Angela Frederick, Angelica Monarrez, Danielle Morales Bridging the gap: A sequential mixed methods study of trust networks in graduate application, admissions, and enrollment Cynthia Villarreal, Julie Posselt, Theresa Hernandez, Alexander Rudolph
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections Prix et politiques d'abonnement Begell House Contactez-nous Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain