Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology
Facteur d'impact: 1.241 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.349 SJR: 0.356 SNIP: 0.613 CiteScore™: 1.61

ISSN Imprimer: 0731-8898
ISSN En ligne: 2162-6537

Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology

DOI: 10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.v26.i4.70
pages 305-322

Need for Informed Consent for Dentists Who Use Mercury Amalgam Restorative Material as Well as Technical Considerations in Removal of Dental Amalgam Restorations

Richard Edlich
Legacy Verified Level I Shock Trauma Center Pediatrics and Adults, Legacy Emanual Hospital; and Plastic Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, USA
Jill Amanda Greene
Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, USA
Amy A. Cochran
Clark College, Vancouver, WA, USA
Angela R. Kelley
Legacy Emanuel Hospital, Portland, OR, USA
K. Dean Gubler
Surgical Critical Care, Legacy Verified Level I Shock Trauma Center for Pediatrics and Adults, Legacy Emanuel Hospital, Portland, OR, USA
Brianna M. Olson
Legacy Emanuel Hospital, Portland, OR, USA
Mary Anne Hudson
Public Health Nurse, Coos County Public Health Department, 1975 McPherson St. #, North Bend, Oregon, OR 97459, USA
Dayna R. Woode
Legacy Emanuel Hospital, Portland, OR, USA
William B. Long III
Trauma Specialists LLP, Legacy Verified Level I Shock Trauma Center for Pediatrics and Adults, Legacy Emmanuel Hospital Portland, OR, USA
Walter McGregor
Biomark Technology Inc., Flemington, New Jersey, USA
Carolyn Yoder
Strategies for Trauma Awareness and Resilience, Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Debra B. Hopkins
IAOMT, Tacoma, WA, USA
Jessica P. Saepoff
Natural Dental Health Associates, Issaquah, WA, USA

RÉSUMÉ

Amalgam restorative material generally contains 50% mercury (Hg) in a complex mixture of copper, tin, silver, and zinc. It has been well documented that this mixture continually emits mercury vapor, which is dramatically increased by chewing, eating, brushing, and drinking hot liquids. Mercury has been demonstrated to have damaging effects on the kidney, central nervous system, and cardiovascular system, and has been implicated in gingival tattoos. While mercury amalgams may result in detrimental exposure to the patient, they can also be a danger in dental practices. In Europe, the federal governments of Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Sweden have enacted legislation requiring that dental patients receive informed consent information about the dental restorative material that will be used. In the United States, a few state governments have enacted informed consent legislation for dental patients receiving dental restorations. These state legislations were enacted by Maine, California, Connecticut, and Vermont. It is a sad tragedy that mercury is causing such health damage to many people. The American Dental Association has said for the past 150 years that the mercury in amalgam is safe and does not leak; however, no clinical studies were ever done and the Food and Drug Administration approved amalgam under a grandfather clause. Subsequent studies have shown this claim of safety not to be true. Over ten years ago, the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal published a comprehensive article calling mercury restorative material a major source of mercury exposure to the U.S. population. The authors of this paper recommend that federal and state legislation be passed throughout our country to ensure that consent forms are given to patients receiving silver-mercury amalgam restorative material.


Articles with similar content:

Implementation of Revolutionary Legislation for Informed Consent for Dental Patients Receiving Amalgam Restorations
Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, Vol.27, 2008, issue 1
Jill J. Dahlstrom, William B. Long III, Richard Edlich, Anthony T. Newkirk, Catherine L. Cross
Dental Amalgam Restorations: Daily Mercury Dose and Biocompatibility
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.15, 2005, issue 6
Richard J. Mitchell, Paul B. Osborne, James E. Haubenreich
Direct to Consumer Advertising in Health Care and Orthopedics: A Review and Ethical Considerations
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.1, 2010, issue 3
Abhijit Manaswi, William M. Mihalko
Abstract of "Animal Testing and Clinical Trials for the Subdural Hybrid Neuroprosthesis: Ethical Aspects in the Context of Human History"
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.18, 2008, issue 1
Nandor Ludvig
Reducing Workers' Compensation Costs for Latex Allergy and Litigation against Glove Manufacturing Companies
Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, Vol.28, 2009, issue 4
Jill J. Dahlstrom, William B. Long III, Shelley S. Mason, Richard Edlich, Erin M. Swainston, K. Dean Gubler