Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN Imprimer: 1050-6934
ISSN En ligne: 1940-4379

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020034793
pages 281-288

Histologic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Xenograft Bone Substitute versus Synthetic Nonceramic Hydroxyapatite for Canine Tooth-Socket Preservation

Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute for Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Zahra Sohrabi
Dental School, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Reza Abrishami
Department of Periodontics, Shahid Beheshti Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Evin, Tehran, Iran
Reza Amid
Department of Periodontics, Shahid Beheshti Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Evin, Tehran, Iran
Fatemeh Mashhadiabbas
Department of Oral Pathology, Shahid Beheshti Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Evin, Tehran, Iran
Narges Shojaei
Department of Periodontics, Shahid Beheshti Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Evin, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Mehdi Dehghan
Institute of Biomedical Research, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran; Department of Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Faezeh Faghihi
Department of Periodontics, Shahid Beheshti Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Evin, Tehran, Iran

RÉSUMÉ

This study sought to histologically and histomorphometrically assess and compare application of xenograft bone substitute and synthetic nonceramic hydroxyapatite for tooth-socket preservation in dogs. This split-mouth clinical trial was conducted in five hybrid dogs, using four tooth sockets in each dog, with a total of 20 sockets for evaluation. Group 1 received xenografts, and group 2 received synthetic nonceramic hydroxyapatite in the sockets. In group 3 (positive controls), sockets remained empty. All sockets were covered with collagen resorbable membrane, and the flap was stitched using nonresorbable sutures. In group 4 (negative control), sockets were without membrane, left empty, and sutured. After 12 wk, 8-mm-high bone core biopsies were harvested from inside the sockets, using a trephine bur with an internal diameter of 2 mm. We assessed the tissue in terms of percentage of newly formed viable bone, percentage of remaining particles, degree of inflammation, and type of connective tissue. Data were statistically analyzed. The percentage of newly formed viable bone was 34.98% in group 1 and 41.30% in group 2, and this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.710). The percentage of remaining particles was 15.95% in group 1 and 14.14% in group 2; this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.902). Both synthetic nonceramic hydroxyapatite and xenograft bone substitute showed similar efficacy, histologically and histomorphometrically, when used with resorbable collagen membrane for tooth-socket preservation in dogs.

RÉFÉRENCES

  1. Bartee BK. Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge preservation. J Oral Implantol. 2001 Aug;27(4):187-93. .

  2. Pietrokovski J, Starinsky R, Arensburg B, Kaffe I. Morphologic characteristics of bony edentulous jaws. J Prost-hodont. 2007 Mar-Apr;16(2):141-7. .

  3. Jamjoom A, Cohen RE. Grafts for ridge preservation. J Funct Biomater. 2015 Sep;6(3):833-48. .

  4. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: Histomor-phometric evaluations at 9 months. J Periodontol. 2000 Jun;71(6):1015-23. .

  5. Carranza FA, Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR. Carranza's clinical periodontology. 10th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. p. 1134-44. .

  6. John V, De Poi R, Blanchard S. Socket preservation as a precursor of future implant placement: Review of the literature and case reports. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007 Dec;28(12):646-53. .

  7. Mecall RA, Rosenfeld AL. Influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on implant fixture placement and tooth position. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent. 1991 Feb;11(1):8-23. .

  8. Wallace S. Histomorphometric and 3D cone-beam computerized tomographic evaluation of socket preservation in molar extraction sites using human particulate mineralized cancellous allograft bone with a porcine collagen xenograft barrier: A case series. J Oral Implantol. 2015 Jun;41(3):293-7. .

  9. Zubillaga G, Von Hagen S, Simon BI, Deasy MJ. Changes in alveolar bone height and width following post extraction ridge augmentation using a fixed bioabsorbable membrane and demineralised freeze-dried bone osteoin-ductive graft. J Periodontol. 2003 Jul;74(7):965-75. .

  10. Etemadi A, Gholami GA, Fathie A, Mashhadiabbas F. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of socket preservation with three different materials [dissertation]. Tehran (Iran): Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 2007. .

  11. Lindhe J, Lang NP, Karring T. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. In: Lang NP, Karring T, editors. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008. p. 1084-94. .

  12. Thompson DM, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Comparison of bone grafting materials in human extraction sockets: Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluations. J Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15(1):89-96. .

  13. Irinakis T, Tabesh M. Preserving the socket dimensions with bone grafting in single sites: An esthetic surgical approach when planning delayed implant placement. J Oral Implant. 2007 Jun;33(3):156-63. .

  14. Denissen HW, de Groot K. Immediate dental root implants from synthetic dense calcium hydroxylapatite. J Prosthet Dent. 1979 Nov;42(5):551-6. .

  15. Kentros GA, Filler SJ, Rothstein SS. Six month evaluation of particular durapatite in extraction sockets for the preservation of the alveolar ridge. Implantologist. 1985;3(2):53-62. .

  16. Kay SA, Wisner-Lynch L, Marxer M, Lynch SE. Guided bone regeneration: Integration of a resorbable membrane and a bone graft material. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1997 Mar;9(2):185-94. .

  17. Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(Suppl):260-71. .

  18. Brkovic BMB, Prasad HS, Konandreas G, Milan R, Antunovic D, Sandor GKB, Rohrer MD. Simple preservation of a maxillary extraction socket using beta-tricalcium phosphate with type I collagen: Preliminary clinical and histomorphometric observations. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Jul-Aug;74(6):523-8. .

  19. Lee DW, Sung Hee P, Suk Keun L, Kim EC. Comparative histomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets healing implanted with bovine xenografts, irradiated cancellous allografts, and solvent dehydrated allografts in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Aug;24(4):609-15. .

  20. Gotz W, Gerber T, Michel B, Lossdorfer S, Henkel K-O, Heinemann F. Immunohistochemical characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite silica gel (NanoBone) osteogenesis: A study on biopsies from human jaws. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 0ct;19(10):1016-26. .

  21. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23(Suppl 5):22-38. .

  22. Park Y-S, Kim S, Oh S-H, Park H-J, Lee S, Kim T-I, Lee Y-K, Heo M-S. Comparison of alveolar ridge preservation methods using three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic analysis and two-dimensional histometric evaluation. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Jun;44(2):143-8. .

  23. Morjaria KR, Wilson R, Palmer RM. Bone healing after tooth extraction with or without an intervention: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Feb;16(1):1-20. .

  24. McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol. 2007 Mar 1;78(3):377-96. .

  25. Mogharehabed A, Birang R, Torabinia N, Nasiri S, Behfarnia P. Socket preservation using demineralized freezed dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factor: A canine study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Jul-Aug;11(4):460-8. .

  26. Rodella LF, Favero G, Labanca M. Biomaterials in maxillofacial surgery: Membranes and grafts. Int J Biomed Sci. 2011 Jun;7(2):81-8. .

  27. Kotsakis GA, Salama M, Chrepa V, Hinrichs JE, Gaillard P. A randomized blinded controlled clinical study of particulate anorganic bovine bone mineral and calcium phosphosilicate putty bone substitutes for socket preservation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan;29(1):141-51. .

  28. Reichert C, Wenghoefer M, Kutschera E, Gotz W, Jager A. Ridge preservation with synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite reduces the severity of gingival invaginations: A prospective clinical study. J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Jan 1;75(1):7-15. .

  29. Norton MR, Odell EW, Thompson ID, Cook RJ. Efficacy of bovine bone mineral for alveolar augmentation: A human histologic study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Dec;14(6):775-83. .

  30. Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: A clinical and histomor-phometric study. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. .

  31. Checchi V, Sararine L, Monterecchi M, Felice P, Checchi L. Clinical, radiographic and histological evaluation of two hydroxyapatites in human extraction sockets: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 May;40(5):526-32. .

  32. Machtei EE, Mayer Y, Horwitz J, Zigdon-Giladi H. Pro-spective randomized controlled clinical trial to compare hard tissue changes following socket preservation using alloplasts, xenografts vs. no grafting: Clinical and his- tological findings. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):14-20. .

  33. Heberer S, Al-Chawaf B, Jablonski C, Nelson JJ, Lage H, Nelson K. Healing of ungrafted and grafted extraction sockets after 12 weeks: A prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):385-92. .

  34. Jambhekar S, Kernen F, Bidra AS. Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 May;113(5):371-82. .

  35. Kattimani VS, Prathigudupu RS, Jairaj A, Khader MA, Rajeev K, Khader AA. Role of synthetic hydroxyapatite-in socket preservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):987-93. .

  36. Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Martin MC, Zenobio EG, Spolidoro LC, Marcantonio E. Comparision of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: Histological analysis in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):18-25. .

  37. Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Panda S, Goker F, Babina KS, Tampieri A, Mortellaro C. Prospective clinical and histologic evaluation of alveolar socket healing following ridge preservation using a combination of hydroxyapatite and collagen biomimetic xenograft versus demineralized bovine bone. J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;30(4):1089-94. .

  38. Ohba S, Sumita Y, Nakatani Y, Noda S, Asahina I. Alveolar bone preservation by a hydroxyapatite/collagen composite material after tooth extraction. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2413-9. .

  39. Thalmair T, Fickl S, Schneider D, Hinze M, Wachtel H. Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques: A volumetric study. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jul;40(7):721-7. .

  40. Kassim B, Ivanovski S, Mattheos N. Current perspectives on the role of ridge (socket) preservation procedures in dental implant treatment in the aesthetic zone. Aust Dent J. 2014 Mar;59(1):48-56. .

  41. Geurs N, Ntounis A, Vassilopoulos P, van der Velden U, Loos BG, Reddy M. Using growth factors in human extraction sockets: A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of short-term healing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Apr;29(2):485-96. .

  42. Schliephake H. Clinical efficacy of growth factors to enhance tissue repair in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):247-73. .


Articles with similar content:

Efficacy of Application of Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Improvement of Implant Stability: A Clinical Trial
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.28, 2018, issue 4
Masoumeh Khoshhal, Ehsan Houshyar, Leili Tapak, Ali Ghamari, Parviz Torkzaban
Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures Using Divergent Versus Parallel Cannulated Screws
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.21, 2011, issue 1
Ioannis D. Papanastassiou, Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos, Zinon T. Kokkalis, Konstantinos Skourtas, Andreas F. Mavrogenis, Konstantinos Nikolopoulos
Histological Evaluation, in Rabbit Tibiae, of Osseointegration of Mini-implants in Sites Prepared with Er:YAG Laser versus Sites Prepared with Traditional Burs
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.16, 2006, issue 2
Sergio Salina, Giovanna Iezzi, Alessandro Colombo, Carlo Maiorana, Filippo Fontana, Adriano Piattelli
Decision Making in Nasal Implantations by Autogenous, Synthetic, or Mixed Implant Units: Surgeons and Patients Needs and Satisfaction Based Protocol
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.22, 2012, issue 1
Mohamed El-Shazly, Hamza El-Shafiey
Immediate Nonfunctional Loading of a Single Implant in the Posterior Maxillary Area: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.28, 2018, issue 2
Amirhossein Nejat, Mehrdad Radvar, Mohammad Javad Zarrabi, Majid Reza Mokhtari, Farid Shiezadeh