Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences
SJR: 0.275 SNIP: 0.59 CiteScore™: 0.8

ISSN Imprimer: 1064-2315
ISSN En ligne: 2163-9337

Volumes:
Volume 52, 2020 Volume 51, 2019 Volume 50, 2018 Volume 49, 2017 Volume 48, 2016 Volume 47, 2015 Volume 46, 2014 Volume 45, 2013 Volume 44, 2012 Volume 43, 2011 Volume 42, 2010 Volume 41, 2009 Volume 40, 2008 Volume 39, 2007 Volume 38, 2006 Volume 37, 2005 Volume 36, 2004 Volume 35, 2003 Volume 34, 2002 Volume 33, 2001 Volume 32, 2000 Volume 31, 1999 Volume 30, 1998 Volume 29, 1997 Volume 28, 1996

Journal of Automation and Information Sciences

DOI: 10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v51.i1.20
pages 15-25

System Strategy for Guaranteed Complex Engineering System Functioning in Real Operating Conditions

Natalya D. Pankratova
Institute for Applied Systems Analysis of National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kiev Polytechnic Institute", Kiev
Lyudmila P. Kondratova
Institute for Applied System Analysis of National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kiev Polytechnic Institute", Kiev

RÉSUMÉ

There is proposed the system strategy for the guaranteed operation of a complex engineering system (CES) oriented to the timely detection and elimination of reasons for the possible transition of an operational state to an inoperative one based on systems analysis of multifactorial risks of abnormal situations, reliable estimating the margin of permissible risk for different CES operation modes and forecasting the key indicators of the object survivability for a specified operation period. There are given the models for forecasting and estimating the permissible risk margin which are the basis for implementation of the proposed strategy as the information platform for technical diagnostics. As an example, the functioning of the closed circulating water supply system is presented.

RÉFÉRENCES

  1. Henning S., Diagnostic analysis for mechanical systems, Proceedings of the 2000 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, 2000, 11–24.

  2. Chao K., Chiang W., Huang S., Huang K., Fault analysis and diagnosis system for induction motors, Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2016, No. 54, 195–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016. 01.028

  3. Pankratova N.D., Kurilin B.I., Conceptual foundations of the systems analysis of risks in dynamics of control of complex system safety. Part II. The general problem of the systems analysis of risks and the strategy of its solving, Problemy upravleniya i informatiki, 2001, No. 2, 108–12.

  4. Pankratova N.D., System coordination of survivability and safety complex engineering objects operation, Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 2014, 22, No. 3, 303–317.

  5. Pankratova N.D., The integrated system of safety and survivability complex technical objects operation in conditions of uncertainty and multifactor risks, Proceedings of conference IEEE, Kyiv, Ukraine, May 29 – June 2, 2017, No. 50, 1135–1140. DOI: 10.1109/UKRCON.2017.8100427

  6. Ovchinnikov K.A., Bushmanov V.S., Network traffic forecast by autoregressive models, Problemy infokommunikatsiy. Nauka i tekhnologii. Materialy 1-oi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, October 9–11, Kharkov, 2013, 177–179.

  7. Gorshkov V.L., On forecast methods in geodynamics, Izvestiya GAO RAN, 2004, No. 217, 365–378.

  8. Steklov A.S., Serebryakov A.V., Titov V.G., Forecast of technical state of ship power systems, Vestnik IGEU, 2016, No. 5, 21–26. DOI: 10.17588/2072-2672.2016.5.021-026

  9. Pankratova N.D., System strategy for guaranteed safety of complex engineering systems, Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2010, 46(2), 243–251. DOI: 10.1007/s10559-010-9201-6

  10. Colby R., The encyclopedia of technical market indicators, Alpina Publisher, Moscow, 2011.

  11. Pankratova N.D., Kondratova L.P., System evaluation of engineering objects’ operating taking into account the margin of permissible risk, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2016, No. 3, 13–19. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71126


Articles with similar content:

Technique of Control and Decision Making in Simulation Modeling of Technological Processes of Dangerous Manufacture
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.38, 2006, issue 10
Victor S. Smorodin
Design Modeling of Service Technology for Passenger Flow by City Transport Network
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.41, 2009, issue 4
Ivan V. Maximey, Victor M. Galushko, Elena I. Sukach
Conceptual Foundations of the System Analysis of Risks in Dynamics of Control of Complex System Safety. Part 1. Basic Statements and Substantiation of Approach
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.33, 2001, issue 2
Boris I. Kurilin
Reserving and Recovering Operations Control by Means of Simulation while Failure Initiation in the Technological Processes of Dangerous Manufacture
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.39, 2007, issue 2
Ivan V. Maximey, Alexander N. Goncharov, Victor S. Smorodin
FAULT DETECTION IN COMMERCIAL BUILDING VAV AHU: A CASE STUDY OF AN ACADEMIC BUILDING
4th Thermal and Fluids Engineering Conference, Vol.23, 2019, issue
Stephen Samouhos, Suhrid Deshmukh, Leon R. Glicksman , Leslie Norford