Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Hydrobiological Journal
SJR: 0.227 SNIP: 0.901 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Imprimer: 0018-8166
ISSN En ligne: 1943-5991

Volumes:
Volume 56, 2020 Volume 55, 2019 Volume 54, 2018 Volume 53, 2017 Volume 52, 2016 Volume 51, 2015 Volume 50, 2014 Volume 49, 2013 Volume 48, 2012 Volume 47, 2011 Volume 46, 2010 Volume 45, 2009 Volume 44, 2008 Volume 43, 2007 Volume 42, 2006 Volume 41, 2005 Volume 40, 2004 Volume 39, 2003 Volume 38, 2002 Volume 37, 2001 Volume 36, 2000 Volume 35, 1999 Volume 34, 1998

Hydrobiological Journal

DOI: 10.1615/HydrobJ.v56.i3.30
pages 30-45

Characteristics of the Autotrophic Link of the Kardashyn Liman of the Dnieper-Bug Estuary (Ukraine)

N. Ye. Semenyuk
Institute of Hydrobiology, NAS of Ukraine, 12 Geroyiv Stalingrada Av., Kiev 04210, Ukraine
V. I. Shcherbak
Institute of Hydrobiology National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine
I. M. Sherman
Kherson State Agrarian University Kherson, Ukraine
P. S. Kutishchev
Kherson State Agrarian University Kherson, Ukraine

RÉSUMÉ

The structure and diversity of the autotrophic link of the Kardashyn liman of the Dnieper-Bug estuary and the distribution of energy fluxes in this water body are discussed in the paper. The role of phytoplankton, higher aquatic plants, and phytoepiphyton in the biotic balance of two subsystems, including the natural Kardashyn liman and the artificial sand quarry, were analyzed. The liman and sand quarry significantly differ in the complex of ecological factors, including their morphological and hydrochemical characteristics, and also temperature and light conditions, which influences the autotrophic link of each subsystem. In the liman, the communities of algae and higher aquatic plants are more diverse in their species composition than those in the sand quarry. Phytoplankton and higher aquatic plants prevail in the biotic balance of the liman, whereas phytoplankton − in the biotic balance of the sand quarry.

RÉFÉRENCES

  1. Aleksenko, T.L., Ye.I. Korzhov & I.V. Shevchenko. 2018. Structure of communities and bioproductivity of macrozoobenthos ofthe Kardashyn liman. Pryrodnychy Almanakh. Seriya Biologichni Nauky 25: 4-9. [Ukr.].

  2. Bass, Ya.I. & V.I. Shcherbak. 1988. Influx of organic matter and nutrients of phytoplankton into bottom sediments. Pp. 59-60 in: Tezisy dokladov I Baykalskoy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. (Abstracts of reports ofthe I Baikal International Conference.) Irkutsk. [Rus.].

  3. Gorkavy, V.K. & V.V. Yarova. 2004. Matematychna statystyka. (Mathematical statistics.) Kyiv, VD "Profesional" Press. 384 pp. [Ukr.].

  4. Zhukinskiy, V.N., L.A. Zhuravleva, A.I. Ivanov et al. 1989. Dneprovsko-Bugskaya estuarnaya ekosistema. (The Dnieper-Bug estuarine ecosystem.) Kiev, Naukova Dumka Press. 236 pp. [Rus.].

  5. Korzhov, Ye.I. 2016. Assessment of the ecologically significant elements of hydrodynamics of the artificial water body (the Kardashyn liman). Pp. 26-28 in: Suchasna gidroekologiya: mistse naukovykh doslidzhen u vyrishenni aktualnykh problem. Zbirnyk materialiv III naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi dlya molodykh vchenykh, Kyiv, 6-7 zhovtnya 2016 r. (Modern hydroecology: role of scientific investigations in solving urgent problems. Proceedings ofthe III Scientific and Practical Conference for Young Scientists.) Kyiv. [Ukr.].

  6. Korzhov, Ye.I. & A.M. Kucheriava. 2018. Peculiarities of external water exchange impact on hydrochemical regime ofthe floodplain water bodies ofthe lower Dnieper section. Hydrobiol. J.54(6): 104-113.

  7. Ovechko, S.V., T.L. Aleksenko, Ye.I. Korzhov et al. 2015. Ekologichny stan urbanizovanykh zaplavnykh vodoym. Kardashynsky lyman. (Ecological state of urban floodplain water bodies. The Kardashyn liman.) Kherson, Khersonska Gidrobiologichna Stantsiya Ukrayiny Press. 72 pp. [Ukr.].

  8. Timchenko, V.M., Ye.I. Korzhov, O.A. Guliayeva & S.V. Batog. 2015. Dynamics of environ-mentally significant elements ofhydrological regime ofthe lower Dnieper section. Hydrobiol. J.51(6): 75-83.

  9. Shcherbak, V.I. 2006. Phytoplankton. Pp. 9-28 in: Metody gidroekologichnykh doslidzhen poverkhnevykh vod. (Methods of hydroecological investigations of surface waters.)/Ed. by V.D. Romanenko. Kyiv, Logos Press. [Ukr.].

  10. Feldmann, T. & P. Noges. 2009. Seasonal and vertical changes in the surface area/biomass ratio of Potamogeton lucens L. in a clear and a turbid shallow lake. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 47: 116-121.

  11. Hansson, L.-A. 1992. Factors regulating periphytic algal biomass. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37(2): 322-328.

  12. Havens, K.E., J. Hauxwell, A.C. Tyler et al. 2001. Complex interaction between autotrophs in shallow marine and freshwater ecosystems: implications for community responses to nutrient stress. Environ. Pollution. 11: 95-107.

  13. Hilt, S. 2015. Regime shifts between macrophytes and phytoplankton - concepts beyond shal-low lakes, unraveling stabilizing mechanisms and practical consequences. Limnetica 34(2): 467-480.

  14. Liu, D., R.J. Morrison & R.J. West. 2014. Phytoplankton assemblages as an indicator of water quality in seven temperate estuarine lakes in South-East Australia. Pp. 191-202 in: Eutrophication: causes, consequences and control. / Ed. by A.A. Ansari & S.S. Gill. Dordrecht, Springer Science + Business Media.

  15. Meire, P., T. Ysebaert, S. Van Damme et al. 2005. The Scheldt estuary: a description of a changing ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 540: 1-11.

  16. Paturej, E. 2006. Estuaries of the Polish Baltic coastal zone. Baltic Coastal Zone 10: 83-96.

  17. Scheffer, M., S.H. Hosper, M.-L. Meijer et al. 1993. Alternative equilibrium in shallow lakes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 275-279.

  18. Scheffer, M. & S.R. Carpenter. 2003. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18(12): 648-656.

  19. Semenyuk, N.Ye. & V.I. Shcherbak. 2016. Structural and functional organization of phyto-epiphyton of the Dnieper reservoirs and factors influencing its development. Report 1. Role of some hydrophysical factors. Hydrobiol. J. 52(5): 3-17.

  20. Shcherbak, V.I. 2019. Response of phytoplankton of the Kiev Reservoir to the increase in summer temperatures. Hydrobiol. J. 55(1): 18-35.

  21. Shcherbak, V.I., V.D. Bezkaravainaya, G.A. Goshovskaya & N.V. Maistrova. 1991. Effect of hydrotechnical works on the development of algae in Dnepr reservoir. Hydrotechn. Constr. 25(3): 166-171.

  22. Shcherbak, V.I. & A.M. Zadorozhnaya. 2013. Seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton of the Kiev section of the Kanev Reservoir. Hydrobiol. J. 49(4): 26-36.

  23. S0rensen, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation of Danish commons, Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes, Selskab. Biol. Krifter. 5(4): 1-46.

  24. Strzalek, M. & P. Koperski. 2009. The Stratiotes aloides L. stand as a habitat in oxbow lake Buzysko. Aquatic Bot. 90: 1-6.

  25. Vadeboncoeur, Y., G. Peterson, M. Jake Vander Zanden & J. Kalff. 2008. Benthic algal production across lake size gradients: interactions among morphometry, nutrients and light. Ecology 89(9): 2542-2552.

  26. Van Nes, E.H., W.J. Rip & M. Scheffer. 2007. A theory for cyclic shifts between alternative states in shallow lakes. Ecosystems 10: 17-27.

  27. Yuan, Y., M. Jiang, X. Liu et al. 2018. Environmental variables influencing phytoplankton communities in hydrologically connected aquatic habitats in the Lake Xingkai basin. Ecological Indicators 91: 1-12.

  28. Zadorozhna, H., N. Semeniuk & V. Shcherbak. 2017. Interaction between phytoplankton and epiphytic algae in the Kaniv Water Reservoir (Ukraine). Intern. Let. Nat. Sci. 61: 56-68.


Articles with similar content:

Phytoplankton of water bodies in the area of the planned oil pipeline (Russia, Yakutia)
International Journal on Algae, Vol.11, 2009, issue 1
V. A. Gabyshev
Species Composition of Pico- and Nanophytoplankton in Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems: A Review
Hydrobiological Journal, Vol.34, 1998, issue 4-5
T. M. Mikheyeva
Recovery Assessment of Hydrologically Related Aquatic Habitats Using Diatom Community Responses
International Journal on Algae, Vol.15, 2013, issue 2
Robert C. Moseley, K.M. Manoylov, Samuel Mutiti
Migrations of aerophytic algae and their colonization on different substrata
International Journal on Algae, Vol.4, 2002, issue 2
I. E. Dubovik
Peculiarities of the plankton diversity in the Southern Bug River in the region of the city of Vinnitsa (Ukraine)
International Journal on Algae, Vol.10, 2008, issue 3
E. P. Tsarenko