Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.26 SNIP: 0.375 CiteScore™: 1.4

ISSN Imprimer: 0278-940X
ISSN En ligne: 1943-619X

Volumes:
Volume 48, 2020 Volume 47, 2019 Volume 46, 2018 Volume 45, 2017 Volume 44, 2016 Volume 43, 2015 Volume 42, 2014 Volume 41, 2013 Volume 40, 2012 Volume 39, 2011 Volume 38, 2010 Volume 37, 2009 Volume 36, 2008 Volume 35, 2007 Volume 34, 2006 Volume 33, 2005 Volume 32, 2004 Volume 31, 2003 Volume 30, 2002 Volume 29, 2001 Volume 28, 2000 Volume 27, 1999 Volume 26, 1998 Volume 25, 1997 Volume 24, 1996 Volume 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v35.i3-4.20
pages 197-342

Pediatric Material Properties: A Review of Human Child and Animal Surrogates

Melanie Franklyn
Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sujanie Peiris
Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Christina Huber
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
King H. Yang
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

RÉSUMÉ

Because pediatric tissue is difficult for researchers to obtain, the biomechanical responses of adult humans have been studied much more extensively than those of children. Piglets, chimpanzees, and other animals have been used as child surrogates, but the tissue properties and responses to impact forces obtained from these animals may not directly correlate with the human child, and this correlation is not well understood. Consequently, only a handful of human pediatric tissue properties are known. Child anthropomorphic test devices employed in automotive safety have been developed largely by scaling data obtained from adult human cadaveric tests, where various scaling methods have been used to account for differences in geometry, material properties, or a combination of these two parameters. Similar scaling techniques have also been implemented to develop injury assessment reference values for child anthropomorphic test devices. Nevertheless, these scaling techniques have not yet proven to be accurate, in part because of the lack of pediatric data. In this review, the properties of pediatric human and animal surrogate tissue that have been mechanically tested are evaluated. It was found that most of the pediatric tissue that has previously been tested pertains to the head, neck, cervical spine, and extremities. It is evident that some body regions, such as the head and neck, have been tested to some extent since injuries to these regions are critical from an injury perspective. On the other hand, there is limited pediatric data available for the thorax, abdomen, thoracic and lumbar spines and fetal-related tissue. This review presents the pediatric data available in the literature and highlights the body regions where further testing is needed.


Articles with similar content:

Biomechanical Analysis of Injury Criterion for Child and Adult Dummies
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.28, 2000, issue 1&2
Anthony Sances, Jr.
Hamstring Injuries
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.12, 2000, issue 4
R. L. Morgan-Jones, T. Cross, M. J. Cross
Sleep and Wake Disorders Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.21, 2009, issue 3-4
Angela Colantonio, Judith Gargaro, Catherine Wiseman-Hakes
Hypoglossal Nerve: Anatomy, Anatomical Variations Comorbidities and Clinical Significance
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.29, 2019, issue 3
Paschalis Stratzias, Dimitrios Filippou, Katherine Ploumidou, Stavros Angelis, Panagiotis N. Skandalakis, Nikolaos Georgopapadakos, Arezina Manoli, Alexandros P. Apostolopoulos
Biomechanics of Abdominal Injuries
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.29, 2001, issue 2
Narayan Yoganandan, Matthew R. Maltese, Frank A. Pintar