Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.26 SNIP: 0.375 CiteScore™: 1.4

ISSN Imprimer: 0278-940X
ISSN En ligne: 1943-619X

Volume 48, 2020 Volume 47, 2019 Volume 46, 2018 Volume 45, 2017 Volume 44, 2016 Volume 43, 2015 Volume 42, 2014 Volume 41, 2013 Volume 40, 2012 Volume 39, 2011 Volume 38, 2010 Volume 37, 2009 Volume 36, 2008 Volume 35, 2007 Volume 34, 2006 Volume 33, 2005 Volume 32, 2004 Volume 31, 2003 Volume 30, 2002 Volume 29, 2001 Volume 28, 2000 Volume 27, 1999 Volume 26, 1998 Volume 25, 1997 Volume 24, 1996 Volume 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2014011825
pages 383-417

A Mathematical Framework for Minimally Invasive Tumor Ablation Therapies

Sheldon K. Hall
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Ean Hin Ooi
School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
Stephen J. Payne
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK


Minimally invasive tumor ablations (MITAs) are an increasingly important tool in the treatment of solid tumors across multiple organs. The problems experienced in modeling different types of MITAs are very similar, but the development of mathematical models is mostly performed in isolation according to modality. Fundamental research into the modeling of specific types of MITAs is indeed required, but to choose the optimal treatment for an individual the primary clinical requirement is to have reliable predictions for a range of MITAs.
In this review of the mathematical modeling of MITAs 4 modalities are considered: radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, and irreversible electroporation. The similarities in the mathematical modeling of these treatments are highlighted, and the analysis of the models within a general framework is discussed. This will aid in developing a deeper understanding of the sensitivity of MITA models to physiological parameters and the impact of uncertainty on predictions of the ablation zone.
Through robust validation and analysis of the models it will be possible to choose the best model for a given application. This is important because many different models exist with no objective comparison of their performance. The collection of relevant in vivo experimental data is also critical to parameterize such models accurately. This approach will be necessary to translate the field into clinical practice.

Articles with similar content:

Mathematical Modeling of Thermal Ablation
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.38, 2010, issue 1
T. Peng, D. P. O'Neill, Stephen J. Payne
Model-based Approaches to Biomarker Discovery and Evaluation: A Multidisciplinary Integrated Review
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.30, 2002, issue 4-6
David M. Foster, Marc R. Gastonguay, Paolo Vicini
Hybrid Methods in Engineering, Vol.3, 2001, issue 4
Dominique Gobin, Benoit Goyeau, Sophie Mergui
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, Vol.9, 2011, issue 2
Gabor Szekely, Sven Hirsch, Bryn Lloyd, Niels Kuster, Michael Bajka, Dominik Szczerba
Ebers, DaVinci, and Euler: Calculating the Pulse. Assumptions, Challenges, and Opportunities in Mathematical Modeling of Aortic Flow
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.44, 2016, issue 3
Hisham M. F. Sherif