SJR:
0.207
SNIP:
0.376
CiteScore™:
0.79
ISSN Imprimer: 0278-940X
Volumes:
|
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v39.i1.20
pages 5-28 Brain-Machine Interfaces: Electrophysiological Challenges and Limitations
Bradley C. Lega
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania
Mijail D. Serruya
Department of Neurology, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Kareem Zaghloul
Surgical Neurology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda RÉSUMÉBrain-machine interfaces (BMI) seek to directly communicate with the human nervous system in order to diagnose and treat intrinsic neurological disorders. While the first generation of these devices has realized significant clinical successes, they often rely on gross electrical stimulation using empirically derived parameters through open-loop mechanisms of action that are not yet fully understood. Their limitations reflect the inherent challenge in developing the next generation of these devices. This review identifies lessons learned from the first generation of BMI devices (chiefly deep brain stimulation), identifying key problems for which the solutions will aid the development of the next generation of technologies. Our analysis examines four hypotheses for the mechanism by which brain stimulation alters surrounding neurophysiologic activity. We then focus on motor prosthetics, describing various approaches to overcoming the problems of decoding neural signals. We next turn to visual prosthetics, an area for which the challenges of signal coding to match neural architecture has been partially overcome. Finally, we close with a review of cortical stimulation, examining basic principles that will be incorporated into the design of future devices. Throughout the review, we relate the issues of each specific topic to the common thread of BMI research: translating new knowledge of network neuroscience into improved devices for neuromodulation. MOTS CLÉS: brain machine interfaces, deep brain stimulation, motor prosthesis, cortical stimulation, network neuroscience
Articles with similar content:
Microstimulation: Principles, Techniques, and Approaches to Somatosensory Neuroprosthesis
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.43, 2015, issue 1 Mulugeta Semework
Chronic Pain: We Should Not Underestimate the Contribution of Neural Plasticity
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.26, 2014, issue 1-2 David A. Rice, Gwyn N. Lewis
The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.44, 2016, issue 1-2 Mijail D. Serruya, D. Kacy Cullen, Dayo O. Adewole, H. Isaac Chen, Justin C. Burrell, James P. Harris, Dmitriy Petrov, John A. Wolf
Neuroengineering Modeling of Single Neuron and Neural Interface
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.30, 2002, issue 4-6 X. L. Hu, Y. T. Zhang, J. Yao
Temporal Coding as a Means of Information Transfer in the Primate Visual System
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology, Vol.13, 1999, issue 1 Timothy J. Gawne |
Portail numérique | Bibliothèque numérique | eBooks | Revues | Références et comptes rendus | Collections |