Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
Facteur d'impact: 3.259 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 2.547 SJR: 0.531 SNIP: 0.8 CiteScore™: 1.52

ISSN Imprimer: 2152-5080
ISSN En ligne: 2152-5099

Ouvrir l'accès

International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification

DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2014006730
pages 479-510

GRADIENT-BASED STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION METHODS IN BAYESIAN EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Xun Huan
Sandia National Laboratories, 7011 East Ave, MS 9051, Livermore, CA 94550, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Youssef Marzouk
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Room 33-305 Cambridge, MA 02139 USA

RÉSUMÉ

Optimal experimental design (OED) seeks experiments expected to yield the most useful data for some purpose. In practical circumstances where experiments are time-consuming or resource-intensive, OED can yield enormous savings. We pursue OED for nonlinear systems from a Bayesian perspective, with the goal of choosing experiments that are optimal for parameter inference. Our objective in this context is the expected information gain in model parameters, which in general can only be estimated using Monte Carlo methods. Maximizing this objective thus becomes a stochastic optimization problem. This paper develops gradient-based stochastic optimization methods for the design of experiments on a continuous parameter space. Given a Monte Carlo estimator of expected information gain, we use infinitesimal perturbation analysis to derive gradients of this estimator.We are then able to formulate two gradient-based stochastic optimization approaches: (i) Robbins-Monro stochastic approximation, and (ii) sample average approximation combined with a deterministic quasi-Newton method. A polynomial chaos approximation of the forward model accelerates objective and gradient evaluations in both cases.We discuss the implementation of these optimization methods, then conduct an empirical comparison of their performance. To demonstrate design in a nonlinear setting with partial differential equation forward models, we use the problem of sensor placement for source inversion. Numerical results yield useful guidelines on the choice of algorithm and sample sizes, assess the impact of estimator bias, and quantify tradeoffs of computational cost versus solution quality and robustness.


Articles with similar content:

UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF THE GEM CHALLENGE MAGNETIC RECONNECTION PROBLEM USING THE MULTILEVEL MONTE CARLO METHOD
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.5, 2015, issue 4
Guang Lin, Eder M. Sousa, Uri Shumlak
EFFECTIVE SAMPLING SCHEMES FOR BEHAVIOR DISCRIMINATION IN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.4, 2014, issue 6
Gregery T. Buzzard, Vu Dinh, Ann E. Rundell
BAYESIAN INFERENCE FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS OCCURRING IN UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.5, 2015, issue 1
Gilles Celeux, Nicolas Bousquet, Mathieu Couplet, Shuai Fu
INVERSE VOF MESHLESS METHOD FOR EFFICIENT NONDESTRUCTIVE THERMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
Computational Thermal Sciences: An International Journal, Vol.7, 2015, issue 2
Hussein Saad, Sandra Boetcher, Alain J. Kassab, Eduardo Divo, Jeff Brown
PRIOR AND POSTERIOR ROBUST STOCHASTIC PREDICTIONS FOR DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS USING PROBABILITY LOGIC
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.3, 2013, issue 4
Alexandros Taflanidis, James L. Beck