Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
Facteur d'impact: 3.259 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 2.547 SJR: 0.417 SNIP: 0.8 CiteScore™: 1.52

ISSN Imprimer: 2152-5080
ISSN En ligne: 2152-5099

Ouvrir l'accès

International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification

DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2019029103
pages 351-363


Soumaya Azzi
LTCI, Télécom ParisTech, Chair C2M, 46 Rue Barrault, 75013 Paris, France
Yuanyuan Huang
LTCI, Télécom ParisTech, Chair C2M, 46 Rue Barrault, 75013 Paris, France
Bruno Sudret
Chair of Risk, Safety and Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Joe Wiart
LTCI, Télécom ParisTech, Chair C2M, 46 Rue Barrault, 75013 Paris, France


This paper is dedicated to the surrogate modeling of a particular type of computational model called stochastic simulators, which inherently contain some source of randomness. In this particular case the output of the simulator in a given point is a probability density function. In this paper, the stochastic simulator is represented as a stochastic process and the surrogate model is built using the Karhunen-Loeve expansion. In a first approach, the stochastic process covariance was surrogated using polynomial chaos expansion; meanwhile in a second approach the eigenvectors were interpolated. The performance of the method is illustrated on a toy example and then on an electromagnetic dosimetry example. We then provide metrics to measure the accuracy of the surrogate.


  1. TNS Opinion and Social, Electromagnetic Fields Report, Brussels: European Commission, 2010.

  2. Huang, Y. and Wiart, J., Simplified Assessment Method for Population RF Exposure Induced by a 4G Network, IEEE J. Electromagn. RF Microwaves in Med. Biol., 1:34-40, 2017.

  3. Varsier, N., Plets, D., Corre, Y., Vermeeren, G., Joseph, W., Aerts, S., Martens, L., and Wiart, J., A Novel Method to Assess Human Population Exposure Induced by a Wireless Cellular Network, Bioelectromagn., 36:451-463, 2015.

  4. Huang, Y., Varsier,N.,Niksic, S., Kocan, E., Pejanovic-Djurisic, M., Popovic, M., Koprivica, M., Neskovic, A., Milinkovic, J., Gati, A., Person, C., and Wiart, J., Comparison of Average Global Exposure of Population Induced by a Macro 3G Network in Different Geographical Areas in France and Serbia, Bioelectromagn., 37:382-390, 2016.

  5. Santner, T., Williams, B., and Notz, W., The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, New York: Springer, 2003.

  6. Ghanem, R. and Spanos, P., Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, 2nd ed., Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications, 2003.

  7. Xiu, D. and Karniadakis, G., The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations, SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., 24(2):619-644, 2002.

  8. Chevreuil, M., Lebrun, R., Nouy, A., and Rai, P., A Least-Squares Method for Sparse Low Rank Approximation of Multivariate Functions, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif, 3(1):897-921,2015.

  9. Konakli, K. and Sudret, B., Polynomial Meta-Models with Canonical Low-Rank Approximations: Numerical Insights and Comparison to Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions, J. Comput. Phys, 321:1144-1169, 2016.

  10. Chiaramello, E., Parazzini, M., Fiocchi, S., Ravazzani, P., and Wiart, J., Stochastic Dosimetry based on Low Rank Tensor Approximations for the Assessment of Children Exposure to WLAN Source, IEEE J. Electromagn. RF Microwaves Med. Biol., 2(2):131-137,2018.

  11. Browne, T., Iooss, B., Le Gratiet, L., Lonchampt, J., and Remy, E., Stochastic Simulators based Optimization by Gaussian Process Metamodels-Application to Maintenance Investments Planning Issues, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 32(6):2067-2080, 2016.

  12. Marrel, A., Iooss, B., Da Veiga, S., and Ribatet, M., Global Sensitivity Analysis of Stochastic Computer Models with Joint Metamodels, Stat. Comput., 22:833-847, 2012.

  13. Ankenman, B., Nelson, B., and Staum, J., Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling, Oper. Res, 58:371-382, 2009.

  14. Bursztyn, D. and Steinberg, D., Comparison of Designs for Computer Experiments, J. Stat. Plann. Infer, 136:1103-1119, 2006.

  15. Iooss, B. and Ribatet, M., Global Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models with Functional Inputs, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 94:1194-1204, 2009.

  16. Moutoussamy, V., Nanty, S., and Pauwels, B., Emulators for Stochastic Simulation Codes, ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal, 48:116-155,2015.

  17. Uguen, B., Plouhinec, E., Lostanlen, Y., and Chassay, G., A Deterministic Ultra Wideband Channel Modeling, in Proc. of 2002 IEEE Conference on Ultra Wideband Systems and Technologies (IEEE Cat. No. 02EX580), pp. 1-5, May 2002.

  18. Courtat, T., Decreusefond, L., and Martins, P., Stochastic Simulation of Urban Environments. Application to Path-Loss in Wireless Systems, arXiv:1604.00688,2016.

  19. Sudret, B., Uncertainty Propagation and Sensitivity Analysis in Mechanical Models-Contributions to Structural Reliability and Stochastic Spectral Methods, PhD, Universite Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 2007.

  20. Xiu, D., Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations-A Spectral Method Approach, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.

  21. Berveiller, M., Sudret, B., and Lemaire, M., Stochastic Finite Elements: A Non Intrusive Approach by Regression, Eur. J. Comput. Mech, 15(1-3):81-92, 2006.

  22. Blatman, G. and Sudret, B., Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions and Adaptive Stochastic Finite Elements Using a Regression Approach, C. R. Mec., 336(6):518-523, 2008.

  23. Sobol', I., Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models, Math. Modell. Comput. Exp., 1:407-414, 1993.

  24. Saltelli, A., Tarentola, S., Campolongo, F., and Ratto, M., Sensitivity Analysis in Practice-A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

  25. Sudret, B., Global Sensitivity Analysis Using Polynomial Chaos Expansions, Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf., 93:964-979, 2008.

  26. Bhattacharyya, A., On a Measure of Divergence between Two Multinomial Populations, Ind. J. Stat., 4:401-406, 1946.

  27. Endres, D.M. and Schindelin, J.E., A New Metric for Probability Distributions, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 49:1858-1860, 2003.

  28. Marelli, S. and Sudret, B., UQLab: A Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Matlab, Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk (Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Vulnerability, Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM2014), Liverpool, UK), pp. 2554-2563, 2014.