Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Atomization and Sprays
Facteur d'impact: 1.262 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110
ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v2.i4.30
pages 411-426

EFFECT OF NOZZLE CONFIGURATION ON THE ATOMIZATION OF A STEADY SPRAY

Takao Karasawa
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan
Masaki Tanaka
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gunma University, Kiryu, Gunma 376, Japan
Kazuhiro Abe
Fuji Heavy Industry, Ohta, Gunma 373, Japan
Siichi Shiga
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan
Toshio Kurabayashi
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 731-51, Japan

RÉSUMÉ

The purpose of this study was to obtain the relationship between the droplet size of a spray, the nozzle hole configuration represented by the nozzle length/diameter ratio (L/D), and the shape of the inlet of the nozzle hole in a steady spray in the range of diesel injection pressures, and to obtain a possible mechanism of the nozzle hole configuration effect. It is shown that the droplet size is insensitive to the L/D for less than a certain value, for a simple straight nozzle, and is apparently affected by the shape of the inlet. However, the inlet shape effect is not substantial, because it disappears when the virtual injection velocity obtained on the basis of the contraction coefficient of the nozzle is applied instead of the mean injection velocity obtained from the nominal nozzle diameter. These conclusions were derived from various lands of experiments using several types of nozzles and different kinds of measurements. A possible mechanism is presented that can explain most of the results.


Articles with similar content:

DEPENDENCE OF SPRAYING PERFORMANCE ON THE INTERNAL FLOW PATTERN IN EFFERVESCENT ATOMIZERS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.11, 2001, issue 6
Sang Yong Lee, Joo Youn Kim
NEAR-NOZZLE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TRANSIENT FUEL SPRAY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.5, 1995, issue 1
Jay K. Martin, Jaye Koo
EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION OF INTERNAL NOZZLE FLOW AND DIESEL SPRAY BEHAVIOR. PART I: NONEVAPORATIVE CONDITIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.15, 2005, issue 5
Jose M. Desantes, Jaime Gimeno, Raul Payri, Jose M. Pastor
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF CONICAL DIESEL NOZZLE ORIFICE GEOMETRY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.25, 2015, issue 6
Martti Larmi, Ossi Kaario, Tuomo Hulkkonen, Teemu Sarjovaara, Ismo Hamalainen
THE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLID-CONE-SPRAY PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZERS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.10, 2000, issue 6
D. D. James, J. R. Jeong, R. A. Sharief