Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Atomization and Sprays

Publication de 12  numéros par an

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110

ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.2 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.8 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.3 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00095 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.28 SJR: 0.341 SNIP: 0.536 CiteScore™:: 1.9 H-Index: 57

Indexed in

DETAILED NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF ATOMIZATION OF A LIQUID JET IN A SWIRLING GAS CROSSFLOW

Volume 29, Numéro 7, 2019, pp. 577-603
DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2019031322
Get accessGet access

RÉSUMÉ

Breakup of a liquid jet in a high-speed gaseous cross flow finds wide range of engineering and technological applications, especially in the combustors of the gas turbine engines in the aerospace industry. In this study, we present volume-of-fluid method based direct numerical simulations of a liquid jet injected into a swirling cross flow of gas. The liquid is injected radially outward from a central tube to a confined annular space with a swirling gas cross flow. The essential features of the jet breakup involving jet flattening, surface waves, and stripping of droplets from the edges of the jet are captured in the simulations. We discuss the effect of swirl on the spray characteristics such as jet trajectory; column breakup-length; and size, shape-factor, and velocity distribution of the drops. Drop size increases with swirl and penetration is slightly reduced. Moreover, the trajectory follows an angle (azimuthal) that is smaller than the geometric angle of the swirl at the inlet. Interestingly, we also observe coalescence events downstream of the jet that affect the final droplet size distribution for the geometry considered in this study.

RÉFÉRENCES
  1. Aalburg, C., van Leer, B., Faeth, G.M., and Sallam, K., Properties of Nonturbulent Round Liquid Jets in Uniform Gaseous Cross Flows, Atomization Sprays, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 271-294, 2005.

  2. Adebayo, A., Sallam, K.A., Lin, K.C., and Carter, C.D., Drop Size and Velocity Distributions of the Spray of Aerated Injection in Subsonic Crossflow, Proc. of ICLASS 2015, 13th Triennial Int. Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Tainan, Taiwan, August 23-27,2015.

  3. Amighi, A., Eslamian, M., and Ashgriz,N., Trajectory of a Liquid Jet in High Pressure and High Temperature Subsonic Air Crossflow, 11th Int. Annual Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ICLASS 2009), Vail, CO, pp. 26-30, July, 2009.

  4. Behzad, M., Ashgriz, N., and Karney, B., Surface Breakup of a Nonturbulent Liquid Jet Injected into a High Pressure Gaseous Crossflow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 80, pp. 100-117, 2016.

  5. Behzad, M., Ashgriz, N., and Mashayek, A., Azimuthal Shear Instability of a Liquid Jet Injected into a Gaseous Cross-Flow, J. FluidMech., vol. 767, pp. 146-172, 2015.

  6. Bellofiore, A., Cavaliere, A., and Ragucci, R., Air Density Effect on the Atomization of Liquid Jets in Crossflow, Combust. Sci. Technol., vol. 179, nos. 1-2, pp. 319-342, 2007.

  7. Birouk, M., Iyogun, C., and Popplewell, N., Role of Viscosity on Trajectory of Liquid Jets in a Cross-Airflow, Atomization Sprays, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 267-287, 2007.

  8. Brackbill, J., Kothe, D.B., and Zemach, C., A Continuum Method for Modeling Surface Tension, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 335-354, 1992.

  9. Cavaliere, A., Ragucci, R., and Noviello, C., Bending and Break-Up of a Liquid Jet in a High Pressure Airflow, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 449-454, 2003.

  10. Dhanuka, S.K., Temme, J.E., and Driscoll, J.F., Lean-Limit Combustion Instabilities of a Lean Premixed Prevaporized Gas Turbine Combustor,Proc. Combust. Inst., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 2961-2966, 2011.

  11. Elshamy, O. and Jeng, S., Study of Liquid Jet in Crossflow at Elevated Ambient Pressures, 18th Annual Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Irvine, CA, pp. 22-25, 2005.

  12. Elshamy, O.M., Experimental Investigations of Steady and Dynamic Behavior of Transverse Liquid Jets, PhD, University of Cincinnati, 2007.

  13. Francois, M.M., Cummins, S.J., Dendy, E.D., Kothe, D.B., Sicilian, J.M., and Williams, M.W., A Balanced-Force Algorithm for Continuous and Sharp Interfacial Surface Tension Models within a Volume Tracking Framework, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 141-173, 2006.

  14. Geery, E. and Margetts, M., Penetration of a High-Velocity Gas Stream by a Water Jet., J. Spacecraft Rockets, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 79-81,1969.

  15. Hermann, M., Detailed Numerical Simulations of the Primary Atomization of a Turbulent Liquid Jet in Crossflow, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 132, no. 6, p. 061506, 2010.

  16. Hermann, M., The Influence of Density Ratio on the Primary Atomization of a Turbulent Liquid Jet in Crossflow, Proc. Combust. Inst., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 2079-2088, 2011.

  17. Higuera,F. and Martinez, M., An Incompressible Jet in a Weak Crossflow, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 249,pp. 73-97,1993.

  18. Horn, K. and Reichenbach, R., Investigation of Injectant Properties on Jet Penetration in a Supersonic Stream, AIAA J, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 469-472, 1971.

  19. Jain, M., Prakash, R.S., Tomar, G., and Ravikrishna, R., Secondary Breakup of a Drop at Moderate Weber Numbers,Proc. R. Soc. A, vol. 471, p. 20140930, 2015.

  20. Jain, S.S., Prakash, R.S., Raghunandan, B.N., Ravikrishna, R.V., and Tomar, G., Effect of Density Ratio on the Secondary Breakup: A Numerical Study, Proc. 14th Triennial Int. Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, ICLASS 2018, Chicago, 2018.

  21. Jain, S.S., Tyagi, N., Prakash, R.S., Ravikrishna, R., and Tomar, G., Secondary Breakup of Drops at Moderate Weber Numbers: Effect of Density Ratio and Reynolds Number, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 117, pp. 25-41,2019.

  22. Karagozian, A., An Analytical Model for the Vorticity Associated with a Transverse Jet, AIAA J., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 429-436,1986.

  23. Kataoka, I., Local Instant Formulation of Two-Phase Flow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 745-758, 1986.

  24. Kitamura, Y. and Takahashi, T., Stability of a Liquid Jet in Air Flow Normal to the Jet Axis, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 282-286, 1976.

  25. Kush, E.A. and Schetz, J.A., Liquid Jet Injection into a Supersonic Flow, AIAA J., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1223-1224, 1973.

  26. Lee, K., Aalburg, C., Diez, F.J., Faeth, G.M., and Sallam, K.A., Primary Breakup of Turbulent Round Liquid Jets in Uniform Crossflows, AIAA J., vol. 45, no. 8, p. 1907,2007.

  27. Less, D.M. and Schetz, J., Transient Behavior of Liquid Jets Injected Normal to a High-Velocity Gas Stream, AIAA J, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1979-1986, 1986.

  28. Li, X., Soteriou, M.C., Kim, W., and Cohen, J.M., High Fidelity Simulation of the Spray Generated by a Realistic Swirling Flow Injector, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 136, no. 7, p. 071503, 2014.

  29. Ling, Y., Fuster, D., Tryggvason, G., and Zaleski, S., Spray Formation: A Numerical Closeup, FluidDynam., arXiv:1511:04234v2, 2015.

  30. Martinez-Bazan, C., Montanes, J., and Lasheras, J.C., On the Breakup of an Air Bubble Injected into a Fully Developed Turbulent Flow, Part 2. Size PDF of the Resulting Daughter Bubbles, J. Fluid Mech.,, vol. 401, pp. 183-207,1999.

  31. Mazallon, J., Dai, Z., and Faeth, G., Primary Breakup ofNonturbulent Round Liquid Jets in Gas Crossflows, Atomization Sprays, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 291-312, 1999.

  32. Mirjalili, S., Jain, S.S., and Dodd, M., Interface-Capturing Methods for Two-Phase Flows: An Overview and Recent Developments, Annl. Res. Briefs, vol. 2017, pp. 117-135, 2017.

  33. Nejad, A. and Schetz, J., Effects of Properties and Location in the Plume on Droplet Diameter for Injection in a Supersonic Stream, AIAA J., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 956-961,1983.

  34. Nejad, A. and Schetz, J., Effects of Viscosity and Surface Tension on a Jet Plume in Supersonic Crossflow, AIAA J., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 458-459, 1984.

  35. Ng, C.L., Sankarakrishnan, R., and Sallam, K., Bag Breakup ofNonturbulent Liquid Jets in Crossflow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 241-259, 2008.

  36. Nguyen, T. and Karagozian, A., Liquid Fuel Jet in Subsonic Crossflow, J. Propul. Power, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21-29, 1992.

  37. Popinet, S., Gerris: A Tree-Based Adaptive Solver for the Incompressible Euler Equations in Complex Geometries, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 572-600, 2003.

  38. Popinet, S., An Accurate Adaptive Solver for Surface-Tension-Driven Interfacial Flows, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 16, pp. 5838-5866,2009.

  39. Prakash, R.S., Boggavarapu, P., Raghunandan, B.N., Ravikrishna, R.V., and Tomar, G., Liquid Jet in Swirling Cross Flow an Experimental Study, 11th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Combustion, Sydney, December 10-14,2017.

  40. Prakash, S.R., Jain, S.S., Tomar, G., Ravikrishna, R.V., and Raghunandan, B.N., Computational Study of Liquid Jet Breakup in Swirling Cross Flow, Proc. Annu. Conf. Inst. Liquid Atomization Spray Systems, 18th ILASS, Chennai, 2016.

  41. Sallam, K., Aalburg, C., and Faeth, G., Breakup of Round Nonturbulent Liquid Jets in Gaseous Crossflow, AIAA J., vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2529-2540, 2004.

  42. Schetz, J., Kush, E., and Joshi, P., Wave Phenomena in Liquid Jet Breakup in a Supersonic Crossflow, AIAA J, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 774-778, 1980.

  43. Schetz, J.A. and Padhye, A., Penetration and Breakup of Liquids in Subsonic Airstreams, AIAA J., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1385-1390,1977.

  44. Stenzler, J.N., Lee, J.G., Santavicca, D.A., and Lee, W., Penetration of Liquid Jets in a Cross-Flow, Atomization Sprays, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 887-906, 2006.

  45. Thawley, S., Mondragon, U., Brown, C., and McDonell, V., Evaluation of Column Breakpoint and Trajectory for a Plain Liquid Jet Injected into a Crossflow, Proc. of 21st Annual Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, pp. 1-11, 2008.

  46. Tomar, G., Fuster, D., Zaleski, S., and Popinet, S., Multiscale Simulations of Primary Atomization, Comput. Fluids, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1864-1874, 2010.

  47. Tryggvason, G., Scardovelli, R., and Zaleski, S., Direct Numerical Simulations of Gas-Liquid Multiphase Flows, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

  48. Vich, G., Destabilisation D'un Jet Liquide Par Un Ecoulement Gazeux Perpendiculaire, PhD, Cambridge, U.K.: Rouen, 1997.

  49. Wu, P.K., Kirkendall, K.A., Fuller, R.P., and Nejad, A.S., Breakup Processes of Liquid Jets in Subsonic Cross Flows, J. Propul. Power, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 64-73, 1997.

  50. Wu, P.K., Kirkendall, K.A., Fuller, R.P., and Nejad, A.S., Spray Structures of Liquid Jets Atomized in Subsonic Crossfows, J. Propul. Power, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 173-182, 1998.

  51. Xiao, F., Dianat, M., and McGuirk, J.J., Large Eddy Simulation of Liquid-Jet Primary Breakup in Air Crossflow, AIAA J., vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 2878-2893, 2013.

CITÉ PAR
  1. Liao Yixiang, Lucas Dirk, A review on numerical modelling of flashing flow with application to nuclear safety analysis, Applied Thermal Engineering, 182, 2021. Crossref

  2. Wen Jian, Hu Yong, Nakanishi Akihiro, Kurose Ryoichi, Atomization and evaporation process of liquid fuel jets in crossflows: A numerical study using Eulerian/Lagrangian method, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 129, 2020. Crossref

  3. Du Mingrui, Wang Zhenyang, Fang Hongyuan, Li Manjun, Zhao Peng, Statistical damage constitutive model for the two-component foaming polymer grouting material, REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE, 61, 1, 2022. Crossref

Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections Prix et politiques d'abonnement Begell House Contactez-nous Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain