Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Atomization and Sprays
Facteur d'impact: 1.262 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110
ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2018021140
pages 481-546

PREDICTING THE PERFORMANCE OF PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZERS

Ozan Ekin Nural
Ozyegin University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey,34794
Özgür Ertunç
Mechanical Engineering Department, Ozyegin University, Cekmekoy, 34794, Istanbul, Turkey

RÉSUMÉ

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the semiempirical correlations that are found in the literature by comparing them with all of the applicable experimental data that are also taken from the literature. Presentation of the semiempirical correlations and the experimental data is done and error analysis is conducted on the sets of semiempirical correlations. Results are evaluated by using two different methods. In the first method equation sets having the minimum error at each calculation are presented and their application range is analyzed. This resulted in separate equation sets for each calculation parameter. In the second method cluster analysis is conducted and a single equation set that could be used for all of the parameters is obtained. Comparisons between the equation sets are done at each experimental data point and their properties are discussed. It is seen that equation sets obtained from the minimum error analysis have smaller error values whereas equation sets obtained from the second method have the advantage of being uncomplicated.