Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Atomization and Sprays
Facteur d'impact: 1.262 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110
ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v20.i7.10
pages 565-579


Martin L. Burby
Spray Research Group (SRG), Institute of Materials Research (IMR), School of Computing, Science and Engineering (CSE), University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK
Ghasem G. Nasr
Spray Research Group (SRG), Insititute of Materials Research (IMR), School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
Andrew J. Yule
Spray Research Group (SRG), Insititute of Materials Research (IMR), School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of Salford, Manchester, UK; Thermofluids Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, UMIST
Leigh Morgan
Unison Engine Components, Burnley, UK


Airblast atomizers are used extensively in aero gas turbine engines. In the pursuit of reducing emissions and increasing fuel efficiency a novel airblast atomizer design is being developed that is capable of variable fuel-placement. Such a design will create two independently fuelled zones, a pilot and a main that can be optimised for fuel efficiency, emissions and stability throughout the flight envelope. The airflow and spray structure of three designs have been investigated experimentally using Phase Doppler Anemometry (PDA) to determine the size and direction of their respective recirculation regions. The experiments were performed isothermally and under atmospheric conditions. Axial air velocity profiles were obtained at a number of radial and axial positions downstream of the injectors. Findings show that all three devices have two independently fuelled regions and two of the devices have very similar flow structures despite their geometrical differences. The three airblast atomizers were also modelled using the commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics package (CFD) CFX. The devices were modelled isothermally in order to validate the CFD models using the PDA data. Qualitatively the CFD captured the flow profiles for the three devices, and there was also good quantitative agreement especially in the downstream regions for two of the devices.