Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Atomization and Sprays
Facteur d'impact: 1.262 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110
ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2019026846
pages 975-999

EFFECTS OF MACH NUMBER ON LIQUID JET PRIMARY BREAKUP IN GAS CROSSFLOW

Feng Xiao
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, HuNan, 410073, China
M. B. Sun
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, HuNan, 410073, China

RÉSUMÉ

Effects of Mach number on the primary breakup of liquid jet in high-speed gas crossflow are numerically investigated. In the applied methodology, the interface movement is directly tracked by a coupled level set and volume of fluid method. The liquid region is solved using an incompressible flow solver, and the gas flow is simulated using a compressible flow solver, with the two solvers coupled at the interface by specifying proper boundary conditions there. The primary breakup processes of liquid jet in both subsonic and supersonic crossflows are simulated at the same Weber number and liquid/gas momentum flux ratio. Different breakup morphologies are numerically predicted at different Mach numbers. The breakup initiation time and the wavelength of surface waves on the liquid column upstream side increase as the Mach number grows. It is observed that gas compressibility results in different pressure distributions around the liquid column at different Mach numbers. The lowest-pressure region at the liquid column periphery makes the liquid column deform faster in subsonic crossflow than in supersonic crossflow. As the Mach number of the crossflow increases, the liquid column penetrates higher in the near-nozzle region while showing a lower spray penetration in the farther-downstream region.


Articles with similar content:

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF PRIMARY BREAKUP OF ROUND NONTURBULENT LIQUID JETS IN SHEAR-LADEN GASEOUS CROSSFLOW
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.27, 2017, issue 3
Ali Dolatabadi, Sara Moghtadernejad, Mehdi Jadidi
NEAR-FIELD STRUCTURES OF AN UNDEREXPANDED SONIC COAXIAL JET
Journal of Flow Visualization and Image Processing, Vol.11, 2004, issue 3
Shigeru Matsuo, Toshiaki Setoguchi, Kwon-Hee Lee, Heuy Dong Kim
A MODEL FOR NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF BREAKUP OF A LIQUID JET IN CROSSFLOW
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.13, 2003, issue 4
Ravi K. Madabhushi
OPTIMIZATION OF BREAKUP MODEL USING LES OF DIESEL SPRAY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.22, 2012, issue 1
Tsukasa Hori, Jiro Senda, Koji Kitaguchi, Soichi Hatori
X-RAY PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING OF CAVITATION AND DISCHARGED LIQUID JET IN NOZZLES WITH VARIOUS SIZES
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.29, 2019, issue 1
Akira Sou, Yoshitaka Wada, Hideaki Yokohata, Rubby Prasetya, Seoksu Moon, Raditya Hendra Pratama