Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Atomization and Sprays
Facteur d'impact: 1.262 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110
ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v7.i2.40
pages 161-181

INDEPENDENT CONTROL OF LIQUID FLOW RATE AND SPRAY DROPLET SIZE FROM HYDRAULIC ATOMIZERS

D. Ken Giles
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California—Davis, Bainer Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA

RÉSUMÉ

Independent control of the temporally averaged liquid flow rate and the droplet size spectrum emitted from hydraulic atomizers was achieved by coupling control of liquid supply pressure and pulse-width modulation (PWM) of instantaneous nozzle flow. Experimental results for a number of atomizer types, typical of agrochemical spraying, indicated that 10:1 flow turndown ratios could be achieved affixed liquid supply pressures. Such capability is useful when a wide range of application rate and rapid response are desired. The spray droplet volume median diameter of emitted spray could be concurrently controlled over a two- to threefold range. The technique is useful when off-target movement of spray material can be reduced by decreasing the volume fraction of spray material contained in small droplets. The dynamic control range allowed eightfold reductions in the spray volume contained in droplets less than 105 μm diameter. The technique was designed for integration into spray application controllers with flow and pressure feedback loops. The technique is limited to spray applications where the nozzle flow is the predominant mechanism for atomization. In situations such as high-speed air flow past a nozzle, the secondary breakup of the emitted spray can reduce the effectiveness of the technique significantly.


Articles with similar content:

HOLOGRAPHIC INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ON THE ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS OF IMPINGING JET SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.7, 1997, issue 2
Y. Shen, C. Mitts, Dimos Poulikakos
THE EFFECTS OF GAS LAYER AND LIQUID PHYSICAL PROPERTIES ON THE BREAKUP OF COAXIAL LIQUID JET SPRAY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.26, 2016, issue 6
Marx Tang, Tony Yuan
SPRAY FORMATION OF A HYDRAULIC FLAT FAN NOZZLE WITH AN INTERNALLY DISTURBED FLOW
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.8, 1998, issue 6
P. J. Walklate, N. H. Thomas, P. C. H. Miller, Q. Zhou
TWO COMPONENT VELOCITY AND SIZE MEASUREMENTS FOR A NON-COMBUSTING FUEL SPRAY IN A DIESEL SWIRL COMBUSTION CHAMBER
ICLASS 94
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Vol.0, 1994, issue
G. Pitcher, G. Wigley
INEXPENSIVE AIR-ASSIST ATOMIZATION FROM 80,000 ORIFICES
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.16, 2006, issue 7
Steven Collicott, Thomas J. Hoverman