Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Atomization and Sprays
Facteur d'impact: 1.262 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110
ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v13.i1.40
25 pages

COMPUTATION OF SPRAY DYNAMICS BY MOMENT TRANSPORT EQUATIONS I: THEORY AND DEVELOPMENT

Mark R. Archambault
Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida 32901, USA
Christopher F. Edwards
Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Robert W. MacCormack
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

RÉSUMÉ

This article presents the results of a study into the possibility of solving for spray statistics directly-without the use of stochastic simulation or Monte Carlo integration. It is based on formulating a system of low-order moment equations from the spray equation and then closing this system by use of a maximum-entropy assumption. The work has two parts: In this article, the basic formulation is presented and issues related to closure of the moment hierarchy and implementation of appropriate models are addressed. In a companion article, the model is applied to a simple case of a quasi-one-dimensional spray flow, that is, a flow in which the statistics of the flow vary in only one spatial dimension. The work shows that while it is possible to formulate the spray problem in a way that permits a very cost-effective, direct solution of the spray statistics, substantial modeling issues exist. These issues, and others related to the basic approach, are discussed in this article.


Articles with similar content:

Generation of anisotropic divergence free synthetic turbulence at inflow boundaries for LES and DNS using the Turbulent Spot Method
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.0, 2015, issue
Nikolai Kornev, H. Kroger
COMPUTATION OF DROPLET DISPERSIONS IN TURBULENT TWO-PHASE FLOWS USING THE GROUP SPLITTING APPROACH
International Heat Transfer Conference 10, Vol.16, 1994, issue
Shi-Chune Yao, Q. Zhou
ADAPTIVE REFINEMENT AND MULTISCALE MODELING IN 2D PERIDYNAMICS
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, Vol.9, 2011, issue 6
Youn Doh Ha, Florin Bobaru
OPTIMIZED NET EXCHANGE MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF FLAMES RADIATION
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.15, 2001, issue
A. de Lataillade, Mouna El Hafi, R. Fournier, P. Perez
NUMERICAL PROCEDURES TO GENERATE AND TO VISUALIZE FLOW FIELDS FROM ANALYTICAL OR EXPERIMENTAL STATISTICS: TURBULENT VELOCITY, FLUCTUATING SCALARS, AND VARIABLE DENSITY SPRAYS
Journal of Flow Visualization and Image Processing, Vol.12, 2005, issue 3
Julien Reveillon