Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Atomization and Sprays
Facteur d'impact: 1.262 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110
ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v12.i123.70
pages 123-143

STABILITY BOUNDARIES OF LAMINAR PREMIXED POLYDISPERSE SPRAY FLAMES

J. Barry Greenberg
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel

RÉSUMÉ

A simple model of a flame front propagating through a fuel-rich droplet—vapor—air mixture is presented. An arbitrary polydisperse size distribution of droplets in the spray is allowed. The droplets are permitted to vaporize at a finite rate so that their interaction with and possible traversal of the flame front is accounted for. Steady-state solutions are established by means of large activation energy asymptotics. An analysis of instability to transverse perturbations is then carried out in order to determine neutral stability boundaries.
Two initial droplet size distributions having the same Sauter mean diameter (SMD) are considered. One is initially quasi-monodisperse (A), whereas the second is bimodal (B). It is found that the onset of flame cellularization is sensitive to the initial droplet size distribution in the spray. Specifically, under certain operating conditions, the flame resulting from distribution A is cellular, whereas that of distribution B is stable. Under other conditions, in which both spray flames are unstable, the cellular structure of flame A is found to be finer than that of flame B. These results indicate that use of the SMD to characterize a spray in the context of cellular flame instability may lead to mistaken conclusions. However, the location of the pulsating stability boundaries was found to be rather insensitive to the initial droplet distribution and, indeed, to the presence of the droplets. In addition, it lay beyond the practical range of Lewis numbers relevant to these rich flames.


Articles with similar content:

INFLUENCE OF WATER SPRAYS AND HEAT LOSS ON NEGATIVELY AND POSITIVELY STRETCHED CURVED PREMIXED FLAMES
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.16, 2006, issue 7
Jiann-Chang Lin, Shuhn-Shyurng Hou
EFFECT OF A FUEL SPRAY ON EDGE FLAME PROPAGATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.22, 2012, issue 4
Leonid S. Kagan, J. Barry Greenberg, G. I. Sivashinsky
DROPLET SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN SWIRL ATOMIZERS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.12, 2002, issue 5&6
Yuriy Khavkin
LEWIS NUMBER AND VAPORIZATION EFFECTS IN SPRAY DIFFUSION FLAMES
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.3, 1993, issue 4
J. Barry Greenberg, I. Shpilberg
SENSITIVITY OF PULSATING ORGANIC GEL POLYDISPERSE SPRAY DIFFUSION FLAMES TO EVAPORATION FREQUENCY DROPLET-SIZE DEPENDENCY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 6
J. Barry Greenberg, Benveniste Natan, A. Kunin