Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Atomization and Sprays
Facteur d'impact: 1.189 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 1.596 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Imprimer: 1044-5110
ISSN En ligne: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2013007244
pages 193-209

EFFECTS OF NOZZLE EXIT GEOMETRY ON SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS OF A BLURRY INJECTOR

Claudia Goncalves Azevedo
Associate Combustion and Propulsion Laboratory, Brazilian Space Research Institute, Cachoeira Paulista, Sao Paulo, CEP 12630-000, Brazil
Jose Carlos de Andrade
Associate Combustion and Propulsion Laboratory, Brazilian Space Research Institute, Cachoeira Paulista, Sao Paulo, CEP 12630-000, Brazil
Fernando de Souza Costa
Associate Combustion and Propulsion Laboratory, Brazilian Space Research Institute, Cachoeira Paulista, Sao Paulo, CEP 12630-000, Brazil

RÉSUMÉ

This paper analyses the effects of nozzle geometry on sprays produced by a blurry injector using water as test fluid. Significant differences on the sprays formed by the injector were observed for cylindrical, conical−cylindrical, and conical nozzle exit configurations. Several operational characteristics were determined, including average droplet diameters, discharge coefficients, air-to-liquid mass ratios, and spray cone angles. Conical and cylindrical−conical nozzles have shown similar behavior and higher atomization efficiency, yielding smaller Sauter mean diameters and mass median diameters than the cylindrical nozzle. Nevertheless, they presented lower discharge coefficients and required higher air-to-liquid mass ratios, airflow rates, and air exit velocities than the cylindrical nozzle.


Articles with similar content:

EFFECT OF COANDA-DEFLECTION-OPENINGS ON THE SPRAY BEHAVIOR OF PRESSURE SWIRL NOZZLES
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.28, 2018, issue 3
Jens Kamplade, Peter Walzel, Ivette Hohlfeld, Marcus Kelz, Markus Thommes
FLASH ATOMIZATION OF WATER/ACETONE SOLUTIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.14, 2004, issue 5
Norman Chigier, T. C. Ho, Tevfik Gemci, K. Yakut
ANALYSIS OF A TWO-FLUID SPRAYER AND ITS USE TO DEVELOP THE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION MOMENTS SPRAY MODEL, PART I: EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.20, 2010, issue 6
N. G. Emekwuru, A. Paul Watkins
DROP SIZE MEASUREMENTS IN HEAVY OIL SPRAYS FROM PRESSURE-SWIRL NOZZLES
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.6, 1996, issue 4
Cesar Dopazo, Javier Ballester
INFLUENCE OF LIQUID VISCOSITY ON PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZER PERFORMANCE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.1, 1991, issue 1
Arthur H. Lefebvre, S. Kevin Chen, J. Rollbuhler