Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Publication de 4  numéros par an

ISSN Imprimer: 0896-2960

ISSN En ligne: 2162-6553

SJR: 0.141 SNIP: 0.129 CiteScore™:: 0.6 H-Index: 18

Indexed in

Measuring Functional Outcomes Across Postacute Care: Current Challenges and Future Directions

Volume 15, Numéro 2, 2003, 16 pages
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v15.i2.10
Get accessGet access

RÉSUMÉ

This article reviews the challenges of developing outcome systems that are designed to assess function across postacute care settings and describes state-of-the-art research that is helping produce the next generation of functional instruments. There is growing recognition of the importance of measuring function across postacute settings; however, current limitations of existing instruments include (1) the lack of a clear theoretical framework, (2) a narrow scope of content, (3) the fragmentation of instruments across settings, and (4) a lack of feasibility. The authors highlight the key methods, such as item response theory, and introduce some preliminary findings in computerized adaptive testing applications that will guide and stimulate future research in this area.

CITÉ PAR
  1. LOLLAR DONALD J., SIMEONSSON RUNE J., Diagnosis to Function, Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 26, 4, 2005. Crossref

  2. Jette Alan, Haley Stephen, Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment*, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 6, 2005. Crossref

  3. Rust Kathy L., Smith Roger O., Assistive Technology in the Measurement of Rehabilitation and Health Outcomes, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84, 10, 2005. Crossref

  4. Mermis Bernie J., Developing a taxonomy for rehabilitation outcome measurement., Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 1, 2005. Crossref

  5. Heinemann Allen W., Putting outcome measurement in context: A rehabilitation psychology perspective., Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 1, 2005. Crossref

  6. Siebens Hilary, Andres Patricia L., Pengsheng Ni, Coster Wendy J., Haley Stephen M., Measuring Physical Function in Patients with Complex Medical and Postsurgical Conditions, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84, 10, 2005. Crossref

  7. Haley Stephen M., Ni Pengsheng, Hambleton Ronald K., Slavin Mary D., Jette Alan M., Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 11, 2006. Crossref

  8. Auger Claudine, Demers Louise, Swaine Bonnie, Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 43, 1, 2006. Crossref

  9. Yeung Teresa S.M., Wessel Jean, Stratford Paul, MacDermid Joy, Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale for Inpatients of an Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Ward, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 39, 6, 2009. Crossref

  10. Balasubramanian Chitralakshmi K., Clark David J., Fox Emily J., Walking Adaptability after a Stroke and Its Assessment in Clinical Settings, Stroke Research and Treatment, 2014, 2014. Crossref

  11. Auger Claudine, Demers Louise, Desrosiers Johanne, Giroux Francine, Ska Bernadette, Wolfson Christina, Applicability of a toolkit for geriatric rehabilitation outcomes, Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 2, 2007. Crossref

Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections Prix et politiques d'abonnement Begell House Contactez-nous Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain