ISSN Print: 1072-8325
Volumes:Volume 23, 2017 Volume 22, 2016 Volume 21, 2015 Volume 20, 2014 Volume 19, 2013 Volume 18, 2012 Volume 17, 2011 Volume 16, 2010 Volume 15, 2009 Volume 14, 2008 Volume 13, 2007 Volume 12, 2006 Volume 11, 2005 Volume 10, 2004 Volume 9, 2003 Volume 8, 2002 Volume 7, 2001 Volume 6, 2000 Volume 5, 1999 Volume 4, 1998 Volume 3, 1997 Volume 2, 1995 Volume 1, 1994
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
TESTING THE DOUBLE BIND HYPOTHESIS: FACULTY RECOMMENDATIONS OF MINORITY WOMEN FELLOWSHIP APPLICANTS
Shirley Vining Brown
Computer Science, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC
This paper examines the faculty and scientists' recommendations of applicants to the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Graduate Fellowship Program, spanning the years from 1976 to 1991. The data are from the Cumulative Index on National Science Foundation Fellowships Applicants and Awardees (Cl). Ordinary Least Squares regression analysis of fellowship Reference Report scores is used to test the double bind hypothesh that minority women are doubly disadvantaged simply because they are both minorities and women. The findings generally support the double bind hypothesis: being a minority significantly lowered the Reference Report ratings of women NSF applicants and being a woman significantly lowered the Reference Report ratings of minority applicants. Support also was found for the identifiabilily construct of the double bind hypothesis that certain women who, by virtue of their appearance or language, are unmistakable as minorities and impact faculty recommendations in a manner distinct from nonidentifiable minority women. Compared to white women and minority men, being a Black, Puerto Rican, and other Hispanic woman significantly lowered faculty/scientists' recommendations. Implications for policy and further research directions are offered.
|Begell Digital Portal||Begell Digital Library||eBooks||Journals||References & Proceedings||Research Collections|